kapwing.com
Paid content
Categories: Video & Film
Generate full video projects from a single prompt using Kapwing. Join over 30 million modern creators who trust Kapwing to create, edit, and grow their content on every channel.
Related questions
More questions →How Music Video Editing Shapes a Song's Chart and Promotional Run
Music video editing is not just a creative afterthought—it is a release strategy. The cut you publish, how long it runs, how it is paced, and which versions you distribute across platforms all influence how a song is promoted, how playlists and programmers treat it, and whether the video supports or complicates a chart run. For artists, managers, and labels, understanding the difference between creative editing and chart-rule compliance is essential before the first frame goes live.
Why the Edit Is a Business Decision
A song can exist without a video, but once a video is attached, it becomes part of the song's commercial identity. Editors and directors shape that identity through:
- Length – a full narrative video may run four to six minutes, while a platform-friendly cut may be trimmed to match the song's radio edit.
- Pacing – faster cuts suit short-form clips and social teasers; slower, sustained shots suit lyric videos and performance pieces.
- Versioning – the same song may need a clean version, an explicit version, a vertical cut, and a shortened edit for different outlets.
Each of these choices affects where the video can be placed, how it is promoted, and how it interacts with the song's chart eligibility.
The Main Edit Types and When to Use Them
Radio Edit
A shortened, often lyrically cleaned version timed to fit radio formatting. Use it when the song is being serviced to radio and you want the video to mirror what programmers are playing. If the video runs significantly longer than the radio edit, some promotional partners will use the shorter cut instead, which can split audience attention.
Lyric Video
A lower-cost, text-driven edit that can be released quickly, often before or alongside the official video. It is useful for maintaining momentum in the first days of a release, when fans want something to watch immediately. Lyric videos are also easier to update or replace if a lyric correction is needed.
Performance Cut
Focuses on the artist performing, often in a single setting or with minimal narrative. This is the most flexible format for promotional use because it can be trimmed, looped, or reformatted for vertical platforms without losing coherence.
Narrative Cut
A story-driven edit, usually the "official" video. It carries the most editorial weight but is also the hardest to shorten without losing meaning. If a narrative video is the primary release, plan a separate shorter cut for platforms that favor brevity.
Vertical / Short-Form Cut
A re-edited version framed for vertical screens, often using the hook or chorus. This is not simply a cropped version of the horizontal video—good vertical edits re-time cuts to the platform's pacing and place the most recognizable moment early.
How Edit Choices Interact With Promotion and Charts
Chart rules vary by territory and by chart, and they change over time. The safe approach is to treat the following as general principles rather than fixed rules:
- Version strategy matters. Releasing multiple edits of the same song can help promotion, but it can also complicate how streams and sales are counted if the versions are treated as separate releases. Check the current rules of the specific chart you care about before splitting a release.
- Timing matters. A video released before or at the same time as the song can concentrate attention. A video released weeks later can extend a song's promotional life but may miss the initial chart window.
- Platform fit matters. A video that is poorly formatted for a major platform will get less promotional support, which can indirectly affect the song's visibility.
None of this guarantees a chart position. Editing supports a release; it does not replace audience demand.
A Practical Version Plan
Before editing begins, decide which versions you actually need. A workable starting point:
- Official video – the primary creative cut, full length.
- Radio edit video – matches the radio edit length and lyrics.
- Lyric video – fast turnaround, released early if needed.
- Vertical cut – 15–60 seconds, hook-first, for short-form platforms.
- Clean version – if the song has explicit content and you want broader placement.
For each version, note the intended platform, the target length, and the release date. This prevents last-minute re-edits that delay a rollout.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Assuming one cut works everywhere. A four-minute narrative video rarely performs well as a short-form clip without re-editing.
- Ignoring chart-rule details. If you plan to release multiple versions, confirm how they will be counted before release day.
- Letting the edit drift from the audio. If the video uses a different mix or edit than the released audio, make sure that is intentional and documented.
- Releasing the lyric video too late. Its main value is speed; if it arrives after the official video, it adds little.
What to Watch For in Industry Coverage
Industry news outlets track release strategies, version rollouts, and chart-rule changes. When reading coverage of a music video release, pay attention to:
- Whether the video is described as an official video, lyric video, or visualizer.
- Whether multiple versions were released and in what order.
- Whether the coverage mentions chart performance, and if so, which chart and which tracking period.
These details tell you more about the strategy than the video's creative style alone.
Bottom Line
Music video editing is a promotional tool with real consequences for how a song is positioned. Decide your version plan before you shoot, match each cut to its platform, and verify chart-rule details for your territory before splitting a release. Creative editing and release strategy are not opposites—the best rollouts treat them as the same job.
How to Use Ahrefs for Your First SEO Audit: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
If you're new to Ahrefs and want to run your first SEO audit, the fastest path is: open Site Explorer, enter your target URL, review the Overview for a health snapshot, then dig into Organic Keywords, Top Pages, and Site Audit to find specific problems. From there, build a short prioritized to-do list instead of trying to fix everything at once.
This tutorial walks through that workflow using a realistic starting scenario, explains what the numbers mean, and shows how to turn findings into actions.
Before You Start: Pick a Narrow Scope
A common beginner mistake is auditing an entire large website on day one. The reports become overwhelming, and you can't tell which issues matter.
Instead, choose one of these starting points:
- A single important page (your homepage or a key product/service page)
- A small site (under ~50 pages, e.g., a personal blog or small business site)
- One section of a bigger site (e.g.,
/blog/)
For this tutorial, assume you're auditing a small business site with about 30 pages. The same steps scale up later.
You'll need an Ahrefs account to follow along. Ahrefs offers paid plans, and pricing and feature limits change over time, so check the current Pricing page for what's included in each tier before committing.
Step 1: Enter Your Target in Site Explorer
Site Explorer is Ahrefs' core tool for analyzing any website or URL.
- Open Site Explorer from the top navigation.
- In the search box, paste your domain (e.g.,
example.com). - Choose the Exact URL or Domain mode depending on scope. For a full-site view, use Domain or Prefix; for a single page, use Exact URL.
- Press Enter.
You'll land on the Overview report. Don't try to absorb everything — focus on four numbers first.
Reading the Overview Snapshot
| Metric | What it tells you | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs Rank (AR) | Relative strength of the site's backlink profile vs. others in the database | Useful for comparing against competitors, not as a standalone goal |
| Organic traffic | Estimated monthly visits from search | A rough trend indicator, not exact analytics |
| Organic keywords | Estimated number of keywords the site ranks for | Shows breadth of visibility |
| Backlinks / Referring domains | Total links and unique sites linking to you | Referring domains matter more than raw backlink count |
Important caveat: Ahrefs' traffic and keyword numbers are estimates based on its own data. They won't match Google Search Console or your analytics exactly. Treat them as directional, not absolute.
Step 2: See What You Already Rank For
Go to Organic Keywords in the left sidebar. This shows queries where your site appears in search results.
Sort by Traffic (descending) to see which pages bring the most estimated visitors. Then look for:
- Keywords ranking in positions 4–15 — these are often the easiest wins. A small content or on-page improvement can push them onto page one.
- Keywords with high volume but low position — potential opportunities if the topic is relevant.
- Irrelevant keywords — if you rank for something off-topic, it may signal thin or mismatched content.
Write down 5–10 of the position 4–15 keywords. These become your first optimization targets.
Step 3: Find Your Best and Weakest Pages
Open Top Pages. This ranks your URLs by estimated organic traffic.
Look for two things:
- Your top performers — understand what topics and formats work. Can you create more content like this?
- Pages with traffic but poor rankings — these may need on-page fixes (title, headings, internal links).
If a page gets zero traffic and targets a topic you care about, it's a candidate for a rewrite or consolidation.
Step 4: Run a Technical Site Audit
Now move to Site Audit. This crawls your site and flags technical and on-page issues.
- Click Site Audit → New project.
- Enter your domain and set crawl settings (default is usually fine for a small site).
- Start the crawl and wait for it to finish.
Once complete, you'll see a Health Score and a list of issues grouped by category.
Which Issues to Fix First
Not all issues are equal. Prioritize in this order:
| Priority | Issue type | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broken links (404s) | Bad for users and crawl efficiency |
| 2 | Pages blocked from indexing | They can't rank at all |
| 3 | Missing or duplicate title tags | Directly affects click-through and relevance |
| 4 | Slow-loading pages | Affects experience and rankings |
| 5 | Thin content | Low value to users and search engines |
Ignore low-impact warnings (like minor meta description length) until the big items are handled.
Step 5: Turn Findings Into a To-Do List
You now have raw data. Convert it into a short, actionable list. Example:
- Fix 3 broken links found in Site Audit.
- Rewrite title tags on 5 pages with duplicate titles.
- Improve 4 pages ranking in positions 6–12 by adding missing subtopics and internal links.
- Remove or update 2 thin pages with no traffic.
Keep the list to 5–10 items max for your first audit. Finishing a short list beats starting a long one.
Common Beginner Mistakes
- Chasing every red flag. Site Audit flags many minor issues. Fix what affects rankings and users first.
- Trusting estimates as exact numbers. Ahrefs data is modeled, not measured from your analytics.
- Auditing a huge site too early. Start small to learn the interface.
- Ignoring search intent. A page can be technically perfect but still fail if it doesn't match what searchers want.
- Forgetting to re-crawl. After fixes, run Site Audit again to confirm improvements.
Where to Go Next
Once your first audit is done:
- Compare with competitors using Site Explorer's Competing Domains and Content Gap reports.
- Track keyword rankings over time with Rank Tracker.
- Explore backlink opportunities in the Backlinks and Link Intersect reports.
- Set up recurring Site Audit crawls so new issues surface automatically.
Your first audit isn't about perfection — it's about building a repeatable habit: enter a target, read the key reports, pick the highest-impact fixes, and act. Do that once a month and your site's health compounds.
How Automatic Background Removal Works and When You Still Need Manual Editing
Automatic background removal identifies the main subject in a photo and separates it from everything else, usually in one click. It works well for clean, high-contrast images—think a product on a plain white background. It struggles with fine details like hair, fur, transparent glass, and low-contrast edges, where a manual refinement step is still needed to get a clean result.
What "Automatic" Actually Does
Most automatic background removal tools follow the same general principle, even if the underlying methods differ:
- Subject detection – The tool looks for the most likely foreground object. This is often the largest, most in-focus, or most centrally placed element in the frame.
- Edge separation – It then estimates where the subject ends and the background begins, based on differences in color, brightness, and contrast along the boundary.
- Mask generation – A transparency mask is created: pixels inside the subject stay opaque, pixels outside become transparent.
The key point is that automation is making an estimate. When the boundary between subject and background is clear, that estimate is usually accurate. When the boundary is ambiguous, the estimate needs correction.
Where Automation Performs Well
Automatic removal tends to produce clean results when the image gives the tool clear signals. Common examples:
- Product photos on plain backgrounds – A solid white, gray, or single-color backdrop with a clearly defined object.
- High-contrast subjects – Dark subject on a light background, or vice versa.
- Simple, solid shapes – Boxes, bottles, furniture, and other objects with smooth, well-defined outlines.
- Images with even lighting – No harsh shadows blending the subject into the background.
In these cases, you can often accept the automatic result as-is, or with only minor cleanup.
Where Manual Editing Is Usually Required
Some image types reliably trip up automation. If your image falls into one of these categories, plan for a refinement pass:
| Image type | Why automation struggles | What manual work involves |
|---|---|---|
| Hair and fur | Soft, wispy edges blend into the background | Painting or brushing the mask to recover fine strands |
| Transparent objects | Glass, bottles, and veils let background show through | Rebuilding partial transparency instead of a hard cut |
| Low-contrast edges | Subject and background share similar tones | Tracing the boundary by hand |
| Motion blur or soft focus | Edges are not sharp enough to detect | Careful edge cleanup |
| Busy or textured backgrounds | Many competing edges confuse detection | Selecting the subject manually |
| Shadows and reflections | The tool may keep or remove them incorrectly | Deciding what to keep and masking accordingly |
The Role of a Refinement Editor
A refinement or "smart clip" editor is where you correct what automation got wrong. Typical controls include:
- Brush tools – Add or remove areas from the mask, either broadly or with a fine tip for edges.
- Edge refinement – Smooth or sharpen the boundary, and recover soft transitions like hair.
- Transparency handling – Keep semi-transparent regions (glass, smoke) partially see-through rather than fully opaque or fully cut.
- Foreground recovery – Bring back subject pixels the tool mistakenly removed.
The workflow is usually: run the automatic pass first, then switch to manual tools only where the result is visibly wrong. This saves time compared with masking from scratch.
Practical Checks Before You Decide
Run through these questions after an automatic pass to judge whether manual work is needed:
- Zoom in on the edges. Are there halos, jagged lines, or leftover background pixels?
- Check fine details. Did hair, fur, or thin structures survive, or were they cut off?
- Look at transparency. If the subject is glass or sheer fabric, does it still look see-through?
- Inspect the overall silhouette. Does the shape match the original subject?
- Place it on a new background. Put the cutout on a contrasting color—problems that were invisible on white often show up immediately.
If any check fails, a manual refinement pass will improve the result.
A Realistic Expectation
Automatic background removal is a strong starting point, not a guaranteed final result. It handles the majority of clean, well-lit, high-contrast images with little effort. For complex subjects, treat the automatic pass as a first draft and budget time for manual cleanup. The more demanding the image—fine hair, transparency, soft edges—the more that manual step matters.
A practical rule: if the subject's edge is something you could trace confidently with your eyes, automation will likely handle it. If you'd hesitate at any point along the boundary, expect to refine it by hand.
How Do Marketers Use Ahrefs for SEO and Content Research? A Beginner's Walkthrough
Ahrefs is a data platform that helps marketers see what people search for, which pages rank for those searches, and who links to those pages. If you're new to it, the fastest way to learn is to start from a real task rather than browsing menus. This walkthrough uses one common goal — finding content and keyword opportunities for a site — and shows the exact steps, which reports to open, how to read the columns, and how to turn the data into a shortlist of tasks.
The steps below describe the general workflow of the platform. Exact menu labels, limits, and available features can change between plans and over time, so treat the interface as the source of truth and check the in-product help or documentation when a term is unfamiliar.
Step 1: Define the goal before opening any tool
Ahrefs answers questions, so the quality of your output depends on the quality of your question. Write down one sentence before you start. Examples:
- "I want 20 keyword ideas for a beginner's guide to home coffee brewing."
- "I want to know which pages on my site have lost the most traffic in the last 6 months."
- "I want to find sites that link to my competitors but not to me."
Each of these maps to a different report. Marketers who skip this step usually end up staring at a dashboard full of numbers with no decision to make.
Step 2: Enter a domain or a keyword
Most workflows begin in one of two places:
- Site Explorer — enter a domain or URL. Use this when your question is about a specific website (yours or a competitor's).
- Keywords Explorer — enter a keyword or phrase. Use this when your question is about a topic or search demand.
A practical habit: start with the competitor or topic you already know is relevant, then expand. If you sell running shoes, entering a well-known running retailer's domain will surface far more useful structure than entering a generic term like "shoes."
Step 3: Read the main columns without over-trusting them
Reports share a common set of columns. Learn what each one actually measures:
| Column | What it tells you | How beginners misread it |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | Estimated monthly searches for a keyword | Treating it as exact traffic you will get |
| Keyword Difficulty (KD) | How hard it looks to rank in the top results | Assuming a low KD guarantees a ranking |
| Traffic / Traffic Potential | Estimated visits a page or keyword can bring | Confusing page-level and keyword-level numbers |
| Referring Domains | Number of unique domains linking to a page | Counting total backlinks instead of unique domains |
| DR / UR | Domain and URL rating on a 0–100 scale | Comparing scores across unrelated niches |
Two rules of thumb: volume is an estimate, not a promise, and difficulty is a relative signal, not a gate. A keyword with modest volume and low difficulty that exactly matches your offer usually beats a high-volume term you cannot realistically rank for.
Step 4: Filter and sort to surface opportunities
Raw lists are noise. Filters turn them into a to-do list. Useful starting filters:
- Keyword Difficulty: cap it at a level your site can realistically compete for. A new site should start low; an established site can raise the ceiling.
- Volume: set a floor so you ignore terms nobody searches.
- Include / exclude words: remove branded terms, job listings, or irrelevant modifiers.
- Search intent: separate informational, commercial, and transactional queries so you don't write a blog post for a page that needs a product listing.
Then sort by the metric that matches your goal — traffic potential for content planning, referring domains for link building, or traffic decline for audits.
Step 5: Turn findings into a shortlist
A report is only useful once it becomes a list of tasks. A simple template you can copy:
Opportunity | Target keyword | Intent | Est. volume | KD | Page to create/update | Owner | Status
Fill it with 10–20 rows, not 200. For each row, decide one of three actions:
- Create a new page for a keyword gap you can serve.
- Update an existing page that already ranks but underperforms.
- Ignore it, with a one-line reason, so you don't revisit it next month.
This is where most beginners stall: they collect data but never commit to a decision. Forcing a create/update/ignore choice per row fixes that.
Step 6: Common beginner mistakes
- Chasing volume only. A high-volume keyword with the wrong intent sends traffic that never converts.
- Ignoring search intent. Check what actually ranks before deciding what to publish.
- Comparing DR across niches. A DR 40 in one industry is not equivalent to DR 40 in another.
- Treating estimates as facts. All third-party search data is modeled, not measured.
- Skipping the audit loop. Research is not a one-time event; revisit your shortlist and check whether the pages you built actually moved.
Where to get help with terms and metrics
Ahrefs maintains an in-product help center and a glossary of SEO terms, and the platform links to documentation from most reports. When a metric is unclear, open the help entry for that specific term rather than guessing — misreading one column can distort an entire content plan.
A realistic first session
If you have one hour, do this: pick one competitor, open Site Explorer, sort their top pages by traffic, filter to pages relevant to your offer, and write down five topics you could cover better. Then open Keywords Explorer for one of those topics, apply a difficulty and volume filter, and add three supporting keywords. You now have a shortlist of eight items and a clear next action — which is the actual point of using Ahrefs as a marketer.
What to Look for in a Video Platform Beyond Hosting and Sharing
If you're evaluating a video platform for a small business or marketing team, hosting and sharing are just the entry point. The features that actually determine whether a platform fits your workflow fall into four areas: privacy and playback control, collaboration and review tools, marketing and analytics capabilities, and practical limits like storage and mobile support. Most general-purpose tools (cloud storage, social networks, free hosts) cover hosting well but leave gaps in the other three. This guide walks through what each area means in practice, so you can map features to your own situation instead of comparing endless checklists.
Start by separating three jobs: hosting, editing, and marketing
Video platforms tend to bundle three distinct functions, and confusion usually comes from mixing them up:
- Hosting — storing a file, generating a player, delivering it reliably to viewers. This is the baseline.
- Editing — trimming, assembling, adding captions or branding. Some platforms include basic editors; others expect you to edit elsewhere and upload the result.
- Marketing and business features — privacy controls, lead capture, calls to action, analytics, team review workflows. These are what separate a "video host" from a "video platform."
A useful exercise: write down your last five video tasks (a product demo, a client pitch, a social clip, an internal training, a landing page embed). For each one, note which of the three jobs it required. If most of your tasks stop at hosting, a lighter tool may be enough. If several involve review cycles, gated access, or measuring viewer behavior, a fuller platform earns its cost.
Privacy and playback control: the business-vs-social divide
On social platforms, everything is public by default and wrapped in ads and recommendations. For business use, that's often the opposite of what you want. Look for:
- Granular privacy settings — can you restrict a video to specific people, a password, a domain, or an embed location? Can you make it unlisted but still embeddable?
- Ad-free playback — your product demo shouldn't end with a competitor's ad or an unrelated recommendation.
- Customizable embeds — control over player color, logo, and whether related videos appear. This matters when the video sits on your own site and represents your brand.
- Domain-level restrictions — the ability to limit playback to your own website prevents your content from being re-embedded elsewhere.
If your videos are purely promotional and public, these controls matter less. If you share client work, internal training, or pre-release material, they become the deciding factor.
Collaboration and review: the most common gap
This is where general-purpose tools most often fall short. A shared drive lets people comment on a file, but it doesn't give you a structured review process. A dedicated platform typically offers:
- Timestamped comments — feedback attached to a specific moment in the video, so "the logo looks off" points to an exact frame.
- Versioning — uploading a new cut while keeping the old one, so reviewers can see what changed.
- Approval status — a clear "approved" or "needs changes" state rather than a scattered email thread.
- Role-based access — reviewers who can comment but not download or reshare.
When this becomes relevant: as soon as more than two people need to sign off on a video, or when you're producing videos on a recurring schedule. For a solo operator publishing once a month, a simple comment thread may be sufficient.
Analytics and lead capture: beyond view counts
A raw view count tells you almost nothing actionable. Business-oriented platforms go further:
| Feature | What it tells you | When it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Watch time / engagement graph | Where viewers drop off | Improving content or editing |
| Viewer identity | Who watched (when gated) | Sales follow-up, internal training |
| Lead capture forms | Email collected before or during playback | Demand generation |
| Calls to action | Click-through to a page or booking link | Converting viewers |
| Embed/domain reports | Where your video is being watched | Tracking campaign performance |
If your goal is brand awareness, basic view counts may be fine. If you're using video to generate leads or train staff, the deeper metrics are the reason to choose a platform over a free host.
Practical limits that affect daily use
Feature lists rarely mention the constraints that cause friction later. Check these before committing:
- Storage and bandwidth limits — how much you can upload, and whether high viewership triggers overage fees.
- Upload size and length caps — relevant if you work with long recordings or high-resolution footage.
- Mobile app support — can you upload, review, and respond to comments from a phone? For teams that shoot on mobile, this is a real workflow factor.
- Export and portability — can you download your originals and embed codes if you leave? Lock-in is a hidden cost.
- Integrations — does it connect to the tools you already use (your website builder, CRM, or project tracker)?
Deciding between a full platform and a lighter tool
Use these rough conditions as a starting point:
A lighter tool (free host, cloud storage, social platform) is likely enough if:
- You publish occasionally and mostly to public channels.
- One person handles video end to end.
- You don't need gated access or viewer-level analytics.
A dedicated platform is worth evaluating if:
- Multiple people review or approve videos.
- You need privacy controls, ad-free playback, or branded embeds.
- You're using video for lead generation, training, or client delivery.
- You publish frequently enough that manual workarounds cost more than a subscription.
Pricing and plan details change often, so check the platform's current plans page directly rather than relying on secondhand comparisons. The right approach is to list your actual requirements first, then match them against what each option offers — not the other way around.
Website Overview
An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality.
Domain and Registration
Registered in 2014, this domain has about 11 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The registrar is Cloudflare, Inc., a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.
DNS and Email
The lowest TTL is 9 seconds, supporting rapid record changes at the cost of more frequent lookups. Nameservers are provided by Cloudflare, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. DNSSEC is enabled, allowing validating resolvers to authenticate signed DNS data. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses.
TLS and Certificates
The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued within the Google Trust Services cloud or CDN ecosystem. The certificate's total validity is about 90 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.
HTTP and Browser Security
The response lacks these common security headers: CSP, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The cf-ray, via response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies cloudflare without an exact version.
Technology Stack Analysis
The public page identifies Next.js, Cloudflare without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.
Search and Social Sharing
The meta description has 177 characters and may be shortened in search results. Twitter Card metadata is configured. The page declares 1 language or regional alternatives using hreflang. The title has 36 characters, within a common display range. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.
Hosting and Email
Pages, Search and Sharing
| Meta description | Generate full video projects from a single prompt using Kapwing. Join over 30 million modern creators who trust Kapwing to create, edit, and grow their content on every channel. |
|---|---|
| Canonical URL | https://www.kapwing.com |
| Language | English (default) |
| Twitter Card | summary_large_image |
Social Sharing Preview
10 fieldsrobots.txt (opens in a new tab)
5 rulesgooglebot 0 allowed · 5 disallowed
/admin/upload//posts//checkout//go/
All bots 0 allowed · 0 disallowed
No matching rules.
Sitemaps
1
Registration details RDAP / WHOIS
| Registrar | Cloudflare, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Registered | 2014-09-26 |
| Expires | 2027-09-26 |
| Domain status | client transfer prohibited |
| Nameservers | emily.ns.cloudflare.com、zod.ns.cloudflare.com |
| DNSSEC | signed |
DNS records
| Type | Name | Value | TTL | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | www.kapwing.com | 104.18.30.197 | 9 | — |
| A | www.kapwing.com | 104.18.31.197 | 9 | — |
| AAAA | www.kapwing.com | 2606:4700::6812:1ec5 | 300 | — |
| AAAA | www.kapwing.com | 2606:4700::6812:1fc5 | 300 | — |
| MX | kapwing.com | aspmx.l.google.com | 300 | 1 |
| MX | kapwing.com | alt1.aspmx.l.google.com | 300 | 5 |
| MX | kapwing.com | alt2.aspmx.l.google.com | 300 | 5 |
| MX | kapwing.com | alt3.aspmx.l.google.com | 300 | 10 |
| MX | kapwing.com | alt4.aspmx.l.google.com | 300 | 10 |
| NS | kapwing.com | emily.ns.cloudflare.com | 86400 | — |
| NS | kapwing.com | zod.ns.cloudflare.com | 86400 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | 43ec517d68b6edd3015b3edc9a11367b | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | MS=ms54552732 | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | Sendinblue-code:ad354a773203ba691ff6819ea189aa6a | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | google-site-verification=C0m7kxH1BNz0SW81i57qoFFLjmORC55dUHjmMnd-UVc | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | google-site-verification=M8olmlvhHc4MCrRLK70tQ67JM7sIrQZBREFbEyROkyM | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | google-site-verification=MLD4bsbP6obtdptWSeLnnwpTUCXxZE4-2sQ3kBbJMrs | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | google-site-verification=QlKJBwRry2p2J27TWRGGufqhxL6apDOE8cnROh6eDHg | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | google-site-verification=VryU5N5EV-qQKm9pAAmhoEsToGibsi4kwrr4QAHPEXA | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | google-site-verification=toJex3DZZS0Pd9e7ZgePvHDIHvrklQrLaHEhtu-7QZg | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | stripe-verification=34735a0e03b5eed12d0fe226f9d47a3e342864d576c440b8a4ec0d6caa9b724c | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.constantcontact.com include:spf.tapfiliate.com mx ~all | 300 | — |
| TXT | kapwing.com | yandex-verification: 8d6e8726ebef0171 | 300 | — |
| DS | kapwing.com | 2371 13 2 7dd714709fc214b4c01a1d334023b3155e4ba690fc126d1155770c25c6968ac3 | 86400 | — |
| DMARC | _dmarc.kapwing.com | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; sp=none; fo=0 | 300 | — |
TLS and certificates
| Assessment | Normal configuration |
|---|---|
| Supported protocols | TLSv1.2、TLSv1.3 |
| Negotiated protocol | TLSv1.3 |
| Certificate subject | kapwing.com |
| Issuer | Google Trust Services |
| Valid until | 2026-12-10T04:15 · Remaining when checked: 77 days |
| Verification details | Certificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed |
HTTP response headers
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| content-type | text/html |
| cache-control | public, max-age=1200 |
| server | cloudflare |
| strict-transport-security | max-age=86400; includeSubDomains |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
User reviews (0)