Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

leadspicker.com

Paid content Multilingual

Categories: Artificial Intelligence

Turn news posts and job listings into actionable leads. Automate outreach and close more deals with AI-powered lead generation.

Visit website

Updated: 2026-10-02 04:43 Language: English (default) Access: Normal

Profile views 11 Outbound visits 2
Leadspicker Full homepage screenshot
Editorial Review

Website Review

What is Leadspicker?

Leadspicker is an AI-powered lead generation and sales outreach platform. Its core pitch is that it turns live signals — news posts and job listings — into actionable leads, then automates the outreach that follows. The tagline on its site is "AI lead generation that runs itself," with the framing that "your team closes deals" while AI agents handle prospecting, enrichment, outreach and inbound routing.

What it actually does

The product is organized as one workflow rather than a single tool. Per the site, that covers:

  • AI Discovery / AI Agents — autonomous prospecting from live sources, described as running 24/7.
  • Data Enrichment — waterfall enrichment to fill gaps in CRM records, claimed at 95%+ accuracy.
  • Sequences / Multichannel Outreach — outreach across channels with smart branching.
  • Unified Inbox — every reply across every channel in one place.
  • Inbound Processing — turning buying signals into leads in real time.
  • Signal Tracking and ABM — real-time buying signals and account-based targeting.

Who it's aimed at

The site segments by role: sales teams (quota attainment through automation), agencies (scaling clients without scaling headcount), GTM teams (full-cycle revenue automation) and marketing teams (turning engagement into pipeline). The agency angle is worth noting — "10 clients or 100 — one platform" suggests multi-client operations are a deliberate use case, which is unusual for tools built purely around a single in-house sales team.

A practical way to judge fit

The clearest differentiator is the sourcing model: signals from news and job listings rather than a static database alone. That suits teams selling into moments of change — a funding round, a new hire, an expansion — where timing matters more than list size. If your motion depends on a fixed, pre-built contact database, this is a different approach and may not match.

Next step: check whether the live sources it monitors actually cover your market and language. The site offers English and Czech, and one customer story mentions multilingual personalization across Europe — useful if you sell into European markets, less relevant if you don't. You can see the tiers at Leadspicker Pricing and compare tooling at HubSpot or Apollo.

How does Leadspicker turn news posts and job listings into leads?

Leadspicker treats news posts and job listings as buying signals, then converts them into contactable leads through its AI discovery and enrichment workflow. The platform's own positioning is "autonomous prospecting from live sources," with AI agents that prospect continuously while the team focuses on deals.

Leadspicker

H3 How the conversion works in practice

  1. Signal capture — The system monitors live sources, including news and job listings. A hiring post or a funding announcement is a public hint that a company is growing, restructuring, or investing in a new area.
  2. Lead identification — AI discovery turns those signals into candidate companies and people rather than a raw list of articles.
  3. Enrichment — Waterfall enrichment fills in missing profile data so a signal becomes a usable record with contact details and context.
  4. Routing — Inbound processing moves the resulting lead into the pipeline in near real time; the site claims a form-to-first-reply target of five minutes.
  5. Outreach — Multichannel sequences with smart branching then contact the lead, and replies land in a unified inbox.

H3 Why job listings and news are useful signals

A job ad is often more actionable than a generic intent score because it names a function, a seniority level, and sometimes a tool or location. A news post adds timing and a reason to reach out. Together they give a salesperson a natural opening line: congratulating a funding round, or offering help with the exact role being hired for.

H3 A concrete scenario

An agency selling recruitment or onboarding software sees a job listing for a "Talent Acquisition Manager" at a mid-sized firm. Leadspicker-style automation would surface the company, enrich the hiring manager's profile, and queue a LinkedIn or email sequence referencing the new role. The rep reviews the reply in the unified inbox rather than hunting for the post.

H3 Trade-offs to weigh

  • Volume vs. relevance — Job listings are noisy; a company hiring a warehouse operative is not the same signal as one hiring a revenue operations lead. You need filters and ICP rules.
  • Timing — News and job posts decay quickly. Value depends on how fast the lead reaches a human.
  • Data accuracy — The site advertises 95%+ enrichment accuracy, but you should still verify key fields before high-stakes outreach.
  • Channel risk — LinkedIn-based outreach carries account-restriction risk; email and other channels are safer fallbacks.

H3 Next step

Pick one signal type you already watch manually — for example, "companies posting a first sales hire" — and define the ICP filter, the enrichment fields you need, and the first message. Run it as a small pilot before scaling. For teams comparing approaches, it also helps to look at how others handle signal-based prospecting, such as LinkedIn Sales Navigator for filtering or Apollo for contact data, so you can judge whether an all-in-one signal-to-outreach flow fits better than separate tools.

Can Leadspicker replace manual LinkedIn outreach for sales teams?

Yes—Leadspicker is built to automate LinkedIn outreach as part of a broader multichannel prospecting workflow, so it can replace much of the manual work of finding prospects, enriching their data, and sending sequences. It won't replace the human judgment needed for nuanced conversations, but it can remove the repetitive steps that consume most sales teams' LinkedIn time.

What it automates

According to the site, Leadspicker's AI agents prospect from live sources such as news posts and job listings, enrich profiles, run multichannel outreach with smart branching, and route replies into a unified inbox. That maps directly onto the manual LinkedIn tasks teams usually do by hand: searching for signals, checking profiles, copying data into the CRM, sending connection requests and follow-ups, and tracking who replied where.

Where humans still matter

Automation handles volume and timing; people still need to write positioning that doesn't sound templated, handle objections, and decide when a prospect is worth a call. The site's customer stories—such as Close with Copy citing up to 30% more booked meetings and Red Button citing up to a 45% response rate—are the vendors' reported outcomes, not guarantees. Treat them as directional evidence that automation can work when the targeting and messaging are sound.

A practical test

Run a two-week pilot: pick one ICP segment, build one sequence in Leadspicker, and compare reply and meeting rates against your current manual LinkedIn process. If the automated sequence matches or beats manual results while saving hours, expand it; if replies feel generic, tighten the targeting and personalization before scaling.

If you want to see how the workflow fits your stack, the natural next step is to book a demo or start the free trial mentioned on the site.

How does Leadspicker compare to other lead generation tools for agencies?

Leadspicker is best understood as a prospecting workflow platform for agencies rather than a pure contact-database tool. Its page evidence emphasises turning news posts and job listings into leads, then running AI agents, enrichment, multichannel sequences and a unified reply inbox in one place. That combination suits agencies that want to scale client outreach without adding headcount, because the same workflow can be reused across accounts.

Where it differs from typical alternatives

Most lead generation tools fall into one of three groups:

  • Contact databases (for example Apollo, ZoomInfo): strong for finding and filtering people, weaker at running the full outreach cycle.
  • Outreach and sequencing tools (for example Instantly, lemlist): strong at sending and inbox management, but you usually bring your own lead source.
  • All-in-one prospecting platforms (Leadspicker, Clay): combine discovery, enrichment and outreach, with more setup complexity.

Leadspicker's own positioning is closest to the third group, with an agency-specific angle: multi-client operations, signal tracking, ABM and inbound routing are presented as first-class use cases.

Decision criteria for an agency

Question Leadspicker fits when… A simpler tool may fit when…
Lead source You want leads from live signals (news, job posts) You already have a database subscription
Client count You run many clients on one platform You run one or two campaigns
Channels You need email plus LinkedIn plus inbound You only send cold email
Team skill You can build and maintain workflows You want a plug-and-play sender
Reply handling Replies across channels matter Replies stay in one mailbox

Practical next step

Pick one client and one campaign, then test whether the signal-to-lead-to-reply loop actually saves your team time. If most of your effort goes into sourcing and enriching leads, an all-in-one platform is worth the setup cost; if your bottleneck is purely sending volume, a dedicated outreach tool is cheaper and faster to run.

What kind of data enrichment and signal tracking does Leadspicker provide?

Leadspicker frames enrichment and signal tracking as two connected parts of one prospecting workflow: fill in the gaps in your prospect and CRM records, then act on events that suggest a prospect is worth contacting now.

Data enrichment

  • The site describes waterfall enrichment with unlimited use, meaning it can cascade through multiple data sources to complete a profile rather than relying on a single provider.
  • It claims complete prospect profiles with 95%+ accuracy, and lists a Data Enrichment use case for filling every gap in your CRM.
  • Enrichment is positioned as an input to outreach, not a standalone database: enriched records feed the agents and sequences that do the contacting.

Signal tracking

  • Real-time buying signals are surfaced without manual digging, per the Signal Tracking use case.
  • AI Discovery is described as autonomous prospecting from live sources — the source description names news posts and job listings as the raw material turned into leads.
  • Inbound Processing turns buying signals into leads automatically in real time, with an example goal of form-to-first-reply in five minutes.
  • ABM is framed as getting the right account, right person, right moment.

What this means in practice

Need Relevant capability Trade-off to weigh
Complete messy CRM records Waterfall enrichment, unlimited More sources can mean more matching and de-duplication work to verify
Know who to contact this week Real-time signals, AI Discovery from live sources Signal volume can outpace your team's capacity to act
React to inbound fast Inbound Processing, unified inbox Speed depends on your routing rules being set up correctly

A concrete scenario: a B2B team selling to growing companies could let AI Discovery watch job listings and news for hiring or funding events, enrich those accounts to fill missing contact and firmographic fields, then push them into a multichannel sequence — while inbound form fills route to a rep within minutes.

Next step: ask for a demo using your own CRM export and a list of the signals you care about, then check how many records come back complete and how quickly a signal becomes a contactable lead. Enrichment accuracy claims and response-rate figures come from Leadspicker's own marketing and customer stories, so validate them against your data before committing. For comparison, general-purpose enrichment and intent providers include Clearbit and ZoomInfo.

Is there a free trial or pricing plan available for Leadspicker?

Yes. Leadspicker advertises a 7-day trial on paid plans with no credit card required, and it also offers a free starting option ("Start for Free"). Exact plan tiers and rates are not listed in the material provided, so check the pricing page for current numbers: Leadspicker Pricing.

How to decide between trial and free start

  • Use the free start if you want to test the core workflow — turning news posts and job listings into leads — before committing budget.
  • Use the 7-day paid trial if you need to evaluate higher-volume features such as multichannel sequences, enrichment, or autonomous AI agents, which are more likely to sit behind paid tiers.
  • Involve finance early if you're a team buyer, since seat counts and outreach volume usually drive the real cost more than the headline plan.

What to check on the pricing page

  • Whether the free plan caps leads, seats, or outreach volume.
  • Whether the 7-day trial converts automatically or requires a card at the end.
  • Whether enrichment, sequences, and the unified inbox are bundled or add-ons.
  • Any annual discount versus monthly billing.

Practical next step

Pick one live use case — for example, qualifying leads from LinkedIn post engagement or routing inbound form fills — and run it end-to-end during the trial. That tells you more about fit than comparing feature lists. If your team is agency-side, test with two or three client accounts to see whether the platform holds up at the scale you actually sell.

Related questions

More questions →
How Do Enterprise Teams Adopt Specialist AI Agents Without Disrupting Existing Workflows?

Enterprise teams can adopt specialist AI agents without disruption by starting with one narrow, high-volume workflow, running it as a bounded pilot with human review, measuring against a baseline, and only then expanding. The key is to treat agents as new team members with defined scopes rather than as a replacement for existing tools or a sweeping platform migration. This article explains what specialist agents are, where they fit across common team functions, and a phased approach you can follow.

What Makes an Agent "Specialist" Rather Than General-Purpose

A general-purpose assistant responds to open-ended prompts across many topics. A specialist agent is scoped to one job: it has a defined goal, a limited set of tools and data sources, and a clear definition of "done."

That scoping matters for enterprise teams for three practical reasons:

  • Predictability. A narrow agent produces more consistent outputs, which makes it easier to review and trust.
  • Permission control. You can grant access only to the systems that specific task needs, rather than broad data access.
  • Measurable value. When an agent owns one workflow, you can compare its output against a manual baseline.

A useful rule of thumb: if you cannot describe the agent's job in one sentence with a clear input and output, it is still too broad to deploy safely.

Mapping Team Functions to Agent Use Cases

Most enterprise teams have a handful of repetitive, rules-plus-judgment tasks that are good first candidates. The table below shows typical starting points.

Team Candidate agent task Why it fits
Sales Research and enrich inbound leads before handoff High volume, structured output, easy to verify
Customer success Draft responses to common account questions Repetitive, benefits from consistency
Marketing Repurpose long-form content into channel variants Clear brief, reviewable drafts
HR Screen and summarize applications against criteria High volume, needs audit trail
Operations Triage and route incoming requests Rule-based with clear routing logic

Notice that none of these replace a person's judgment. They compress the repetitive portion so the human spends time on exceptions and decisions.

A Phased Adoption Approach: Pilot, Measure, Expand

Phase 1: Pick one workflow and define success

Choose a task that is high-volume, low-risk, and currently a bottleneck. Write down:

  • The current process, step by step
  • The baseline metric (time per task, volume per week, error rate)
  • What "good output" looks like, with two or three examples
  • Who reviews the agent's work

Phase 2: Run a bounded pilot

Keep the agent inside the existing workflow rather than beside it. For example, the agent drafts; the human sends. Set a review gate so nothing leaves the team unreviewed. Run for a fixed period, such as four to six weeks, with a small group.

Phase 3: Measure against the baseline

Compare the same metrics you recorded in Phase 1. Look for time saved, consistency gained, and — importantly — where the agent failed. Failures tell you whether the scope was right.

Phase 4: Expand deliberately

Only widen scope after the pilot shows a clear, repeatable gain. Expand in one of two directions: more volume of the same task, or an adjacent task with the same data and review pattern. Avoid expanding into a new function and a new data source at the same time.

Handling Workflow Integration Concerns

Data access

Give each agent the minimum access its task requires. Prefer read access plus a single write action over broad permissions. Document which systems it touches so security and IT can review.

Handoffs

Define exactly where the agent stops and a human begins. A simple handoff rule works well: the agent completes the task and flags anything outside its defined scope for a person. Ambiguous handoffs are the most common source of friction.

Human oversight

Decide the review level up front:

  • Full review for anything customer-facing or high-stakes
  • Spot check for internal, low-risk outputs
  • Exception-only review once the agent has a track record

Start stricter than you think you need, then relax as evidence accumulates.

How Roles and Responsibilities Shift

Adopting agents rarely removes roles; it redistributes effort. Expect these shifts:

  • Reviewers become editors. People spend less time producing first drafts and more time improving and approving them.
  • Process owners become agent owners. Someone needs to maintain the agent's instructions, examples, and scope as the business changes.
  • New quality checks appear. Teams need a lightweight way to catch drift — for example, a weekly sample review.

Be explicit about who owns the agent after launch. An unowned agent degrades quietly.

Practical Criteria for Choosing Where to Start

Score candidate workflows against these questions:

  1. Volume: Does it happen often enough to matter?
  2. Risk: What is the cost of a wrong output, and can a human catch it?
  3. Structure: Is the input and output reasonably consistent?
  4. Baseline: Can you measure the current state today?
  5. Ownership: Is there a person who will own the agent after launch?

A workflow that scores well on all five is a strong first pilot. A high-volume task with no clear owner is a poor start, no matter how repetitive it is.

A Simple Pilot Template

You can copy this structure to scope your first agent:

  • Task: [one sentence]
  • Current baseline: [time/volume/error rate]
  • Agent scope: [what it does, what it does not do]
  • Data access: [systems, read/write]
  • Handoff rule: [when it escalates to a human]
  • Review level: [full / spot / exception]
  • Owner: [name]
  • Pilot length: [weeks]
  • Success metric: [target]

Bottom Line

Disruption comes from adopting too much at once, not from agents themselves. Start with one scoped task, keep humans in the loop, measure against a real baseline, and expand only when the evidence supports it. Platforms built around specialist agents — such as Relevance AI, which offers agents for sales, customer success, marketing, and HR — are designed for exactly this kind of task-by-task rollout, so you can add capability without rebuilding your team's existing processes.

How Do Marketers Use Ahrefs for SEO and Content Research? A Beginner's Walkthrough

Ahrefs is a data platform that helps marketers see what people search for, which pages rank for those searches, and who links to those pages. If you're new to it, the fastest way to learn is to start from a real task rather than browsing menus. This walkthrough uses one common goal — finding content and keyword opportunities for a site — and shows the exact steps, which reports to open, how to read the columns, and how to turn the data into a shortlist of tasks.

The steps below describe the general workflow of the platform. Exact menu labels, limits, and available features can change between plans and over time, so treat the interface as the source of truth and check the in-product help or documentation when a term is unfamiliar.

Step 1: Define the goal before opening any tool

Ahrefs answers questions, so the quality of your output depends on the quality of your question. Write down one sentence before you start. Examples:

  • "I want 20 keyword ideas for a beginner's guide to home coffee brewing."
  • "I want to know which pages on my site have lost the most traffic in the last 6 months."
  • "I want to find sites that link to my competitors but not to me."

Each of these maps to a different report. Marketers who skip this step usually end up staring at a dashboard full of numbers with no decision to make.

Step 2: Enter a domain or a keyword

Most workflows begin in one of two places:

  • Site Explorer — enter a domain or URL. Use this when your question is about a specific website (yours or a competitor's).
  • Keywords Explorer — enter a keyword or phrase. Use this when your question is about a topic or search demand.

A practical habit: start with the competitor or topic you already know is relevant, then expand. If you sell running shoes, entering a well-known running retailer's domain will surface far more useful structure than entering a generic term like "shoes."

Step 3: Read the main columns without over-trusting them

Reports share a common set of columns. Learn what each one actually measures:

Column What it tells you How beginners misread it
Volume Estimated monthly searches for a keyword Treating it as exact traffic you will get
Keyword Difficulty (KD) How hard it looks to rank in the top results Assuming a low KD guarantees a ranking
Traffic / Traffic Potential Estimated visits a page or keyword can bring Confusing page-level and keyword-level numbers
Referring Domains Number of unique domains linking to a page Counting total backlinks instead of unique domains
DR / UR Domain and URL rating on a 0–100 scale Comparing scores across unrelated niches

Two rules of thumb: volume is an estimate, not a promise, and difficulty is a relative signal, not a gate. A keyword with modest volume and low difficulty that exactly matches your offer usually beats a high-volume term you cannot realistically rank for.

Step 4: Filter and sort to surface opportunities

Raw lists are noise. Filters turn them into a to-do list. Useful starting filters:

  • Keyword Difficulty: cap it at a level your site can realistically compete for. A new site should start low; an established site can raise the ceiling.
  • Volume: set a floor so you ignore terms nobody searches.
  • Include / exclude words: remove branded terms, job listings, or irrelevant modifiers.
  • Search intent: separate informational, commercial, and transactional queries so you don't write a blog post for a page that needs a product listing.

Then sort by the metric that matches your goal — traffic potential for content planning, referring domains for link building, or traffic decline for audits.

Step 5: Turn findings into a shortlist

A report is only useful once it becomes a list of tasks. A simple template you can copy:

Opportunity | Target keyword | Intent | Est. volume | KD | Page to create/update | Owner | Status

Fill it with 10–20 rows, not 200. For each row, decide one of three actions:

  1. Create a new page for a keyword gap you can serve.
  2. Update an existing page that already ranks but underperforms.
  3. Ignore it, with a one-line reason, so you don't revisit it next month.

This is where most beginners stall: they collect data but never commit to a decision. Forcing a create/update/ignore choice per row fixes that.

Step 6: Common beginner mistakes

  • Chasing volume only. A high-volume keyword with the wrong intent sends traffic that never converts.
  • Ignoring search intent. Check what actually ranks before deciding what to publish.
  • Comparing DR across niches. A DR 40 in one industry is not equivalent to DR 40 in another.
  • Treating estimates as facts. All third-party search data is modeled, not measured.
  • Skipping the audit loop. Research is not a one-time event; revisit your shortlist and check whether the pages you built actually moved.

Where to get help with terms and metrics

Ahrefs maintains an in-product help center and a glossary of SEO terms, and the platform links to documentation from most reports. When a metric is unclear, open the help entry for that specific term rather than guessing — misreading one column can distort an entire content plan.

A realistic first session

If you have one hour, do this: pick one competitor, open Site Explorer, sort their top pages by traffic, filter to pages relevant to your offer, and write down five topics you could cover better. Then open Keywords Explorer for one of those topics, apply a difficulty and volume filter, and add three supporting keywords. You now have a shortlist of eight items and a clear next action — which is the actual point of using Ahrefs as a marketer.

Website Overview

An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality. Several search or sharing settings need attention. Together they may make snippets, preview images or preferred URLs less consistent across platforms.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2015, this domain has about 11 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by ignum.com, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown. TXT records include verification markers for Google, Microsoft. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued within the Google Trust Services cloud or CDN ecosystem. The certificate's total validity is about 90 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The response lacks these common security headers: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The cf-ray response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies cloudflare without an exact version.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Cloudflare without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

The title has 67 characters and may be truncated in search results. Open Graph is partially configured; og:image is missing. Twitter Card metadata is configured. The page declares 3 language or regional alternatives using hreflang. A meta description is present, with 127 characters.

Hosting and Email

DNSignum.com
HostingCloudflare
EmailGoogle Workspace
Location United States flagUnited States 198.202.211.1

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionTurn news posts and job listings into actionable leads. Automate outreach and close more deals with AI-powered lead generation.
Canonical URLhttps://www.leadspicker.com
LanguageEnglish (default) · Multilingual
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image
All bots 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/

Registration details RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarGransy, s.r.o.
Registered2015-06-09
Expires2027-06-09
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserversns1.ignum.com、ns2.ignum.cz
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Acdn.webflow.com198.202.211.1300—
AAAAcdn.webflow.com2620:cb:2000::1300—
MXleadspicker.comaspmx.l.google.com36001
MXleadspicker.comalt1.aspmx.l.google.com36005
MXleadspicker.comalt2.aspmx.l.google.com36005
MXleadspicker.comalt3.aspmx.l.google.com360010
MXleadspicker.comalt4.aspmx.l.google.com360010
NSleadspicker.comns1.ignum.com3600—
NSleadspicker.comns2.ignum.cz3600—
TXTleadspicker.comMS=ms611434253600—
TXTleadspicker.comMS=ms770840193600—
TXTleadspicker.comgoogle-site-verification=1GEotBaEwMPp-qqQwPMkGv9xcc8lwc-tuQyH0lb7lLk3600—
TXTleadspicker.comgoogle-site-verification=KBaEz-BwbfCpk2D3aLkcUuqTOZowaEJhgsSJ7A8FreA3600—
TXTleadspicker.comgoogle-site-verification=MUQLvTHoeyKvAm9k_7Iwo7kbWS-BAN9vdRy-8yRXL9A3600—
TXTleadspicker.comgoogle-site-verification=qfn8_5T1KvdGRJx1iS-OOkLUl8nQXisln-NzgRRqo-k3600—
TXTleadspicker.comgoogle-site-verification=vTYXByvGN37Mm86CfDlhHs10c-vtYg8To_b2WujGHJU3600—
TXTleadspicker.comgoogle-site-verification=wtCa6oa0s3xSoabiBXxspyberULH7mphGUB9310NnKo3600—
TXTleadspicker.comhubspot-developer-verification=NTlmMWYzYTYtOGJmNi00NzE5LWI3YTgtNzEwYjI1NmY2ZmRh3600—
TXTleadspicker.comopenai-domain-verification=dv-10MR6RiYenbmCitgC5HYPjLl3600—
TXTleadspicker.comopenai-domain-verification=dv-wsDWEPFDt1f2WOerTs3WdBWB3600—
TXTleadspicker.comv=spf1 include:emsd1.com include:_spf.google.com ip4:54.36.93.131 ip4:54.36.93.132 include:servers.mcsv.net ~all3600—
CNAMEwww.leadspicker.comcdn.webflow.com3600—
DMARC_dmarc.leadspicker.comv=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=5; rua=mailto:[email protected]3600—

TLS and certificates

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectwww.leadspicker.com
IssuerGoogle Trust Services
Valid until2026-11-21T21:35 · Remaining when checked: 50 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
servercloudflare
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000

Identified technologies

WebflowGoogle Tag ManagerIntercomCloudflare