Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

mediasurvey.com

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 1 Outbound visits 0 Normal
Tech Media Insight Since 1998 - Sam Whitmore Media Survey Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Marketing
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
1998
Hosting
branchcms.comInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Sam Whitmore Media Survey?

Sam Whitmore Media Survey (SWMS) is a subscription-style research and analysis service for technology public relations professionals. Running since 1998 and published at Sam Whitmore Media Survey, it focuses on helping tech PR teams pitch journalists and analysts more effectively by explaining how specific publications and reporters actually work.

What it covers

The site organizes its material into recurring sections that reflect its core audience:

  • Research — empirical audits of publications (for example, an "SWMS Audit" examining a single outlet's coverage patterns).
  • Cheat Sheets — curated lists of contact targets and beats, such as CNBC producers, Yahoo Finance hosts, cybersecurity podcasts, CEO/leadership podcasts, and quantum computing targets.
  • PR — practical guidance aimed at improving pitch outcomes.
  • Strategies — longer-form thinking on media relations.
  • Influencers — short profiles of individual journalists ("Out of the Gate" items on reporters at outlets like The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, and The Information).

Who it is for

Its stated reader is the tech PR practitioner who needs to know which editor covers what, how a newsroom decides, and where to place contributed content. A typical use: a PR lead preparing a client for a launch checks the relevant cheat sheet to identify the right producers or editors, then reads the audit of that outlet to tailor the pitch.

How it differs from general media databases

Media databases list contacts and beats; SWMS emphasizes editorial judgment — interviews with editors, analysis of published work, and commentary on why certain pitches land. That makes it more of a briefing and coaching resource than a contact directory.

Next step: if you handle tech PR, look at the Cheat Sheets and Research sections first — they map most directly to day-to-day pitching decisions.

How can tech PR pros use SWMS cheat sheets to target the right journalists?

SWMS cheat sheets work best as a mapping tool, not a pitch list. Each sheet compiles a specific set of targets — named producers and hosts at Yahoo Finance, CNBC producers, CEO and leadership podcasts, cybersecurity podcasts, "gatekeepers," or emerging beats like quantum computing — so a PR pro can start from the outlet or format they want and work back to the people who decide what gets covered. The site frames these as research that helps tech PR pros "pitch more effectively," and the individual sheets are narrow by design (one outlet, one format, one beat), which makes them more actionable than a generic media database.

A practical workflow

  1. Pick the sheet that matches your story type, not your client's category. A CEO profile pitch belongs on the CEO Profiles or CEO/Leadership Podcasts sheet; a security product launch belongs on the Cybersecurity Podcasts sheet. Matching format first avoids pitching a podcast host with a news exclusive.
  2. Read the editor's own commentary on the sheet. The entries carry observations — for instance, the CEO Profiles sheet flags a bias toward superstar CEOs and thin opportunities for up-and-comers, which is a direct hint that a lesser-known founder angle may be a harder sell there. The Yahoo Finance sheet notes heavy video activity, signaling where the influence sits.
  3. Cross-reference with the interview and "Out of the Gate" items. SWMS publishes interviews with business and tech editors plus new-job items (Cade Metz at NYT, Erin Woo at WSJ, Micah Barkley at Bloomberg, Alex Eichenstein at The Information). A cheat sheet tells you who holds a role; a job-change item tells you the role just changed hands — a good moment for a fresh relationship rather than a cold pitch.
  4. Use the "SWMS Audit" research as a reality check. The site describes audits as a way to see a publication "empirically, the way it actually is," which pairs naturally with cheat sheets: the sheet says who to contact, the audit suggests what that outlet actually publishes.

Trade-offs to weigh

Approach Strength Limitation
Cheat sheet first Fast route to named contacts on a specific beat or format Point-in-time; producer and host roles turn over, so verify current titles
Interview and job-change items Reveals what editors say they want and who just moved Requires reading, not skimming; slower than a list
Broad media database Wide coverage No editorial context on fit or bias

The sheets are also explicitly framed as evolving — several carry "updated" labels — so treat any downloaded copy as a starting snapshot and confirm the person still holds the role before you pitch. For adjacent context on how tech coverage is tracked, Sam Whitmore Media Survey is the source itself; general tech-press coverage from outlets like TechCrunch can help you sanity-check whether a beat is heating up before you invest in a sheet built around it.

Next step: choose one upcoming pitch, find the single sheet whose format and beat match it, and write two sentences for each named contact explaining why this story fits what that person covers — then discard anyone you can't justify.

What does the SWMS Audit research reveal about publications like VentureBeat?

The SWMS Audit is described on the site as an ongoing research feature that examines a publication "empirically, the way it actually is," with VentureBeat named as the first subject. The page does not publish the audit's findings themselves, so the specific conclusions about VentureBeat are not visible here. What the description does establish is the method: rather than relying on reputation or a publication's own positioning, the audit looks at what the outlet actually publishes.

For a tech PR practitioner, that distinction matters. An empirical read of an outlet helps you decide whether a given client story fits its real coverage patterns, not just its stated beat. The audit sits alongside SWMS's other research formats, which include interviews with business and technology editors and analysis of published work aimed at helping PR pros land coverage and build relationships.

To go further, open the VentureBeat audit entry itself and compare its observed coverage patterns against your pitch. As a decision criterion: if the audit shows the outlet gravitating toward a narrower set of topics than its brand suggests, treat that narrower set as your targeting guide. Related context is available at Sam Whitmore Media Survey.

Who are the tech editors and reporters featured in the 'Out of the Gate' interviews?

The "Out of the Gate" interviews on Sam Whitmore Media Survey profile individual tech journalists as they take on new beats or roles. From the site's recent listings, the featured names include:

  • Cade Metz, The New York Times
  • Erin Woo, The Wall Street Journal
  • Micah Barkley, Bloomberg
  • Alex Eichenstein, The Information

These are the people profiled in the interviews shown on the page, not a complete roster of everyone the survey has ever covered.

For a tech PR reader, the practical use is to treat each "Out of the Gate" entry as a beat-mapping note: match the reporter to their outlet's coverage focus (e.g., The Information for deep industry scoops, Bloomberg for markets and corporate news) before pitching. As a next step, check the publication date on each interview and confirm the reporter's current beat on the outlet's own site, since role changes go stale quickly.

How does SWMS help PR professionals build long-term relationships with tech media?

SWMS is built for that relationship-building job specifically: it interviews business and technology editors and publishes their advice, and it analyzes published work to show how coverage actually gets landed. For a tech PR pro, that means you can prepare a pitch around what a given editor has said they want, rather than around your own messaging.

Where the long-term value sits

  • Editor interviews give you the reporter's own words on what they care about, which is more durable than any single pitch angle.
  • "Out of the Gate" profiles of newly appointed journalists (the page lists examples at the NYT, WSJ, Bloomberg and The Information) are useful for getting in early with someone before their inbox fills up.
  • Cheat sheets consolidate targets in one place — the page shows ones for cybersecurity podcasts, CEO/leadership podcasts, CNBC producers and Yahoo Finance hosts/producers — so you can map a beat over time instead of chasing one story.
  • SWMS Audit is described as an ongoing feature for seeing a publication "empirically, the way it actually is," which supports judging a outlet's real behavior rather than its reputation.

How to use it in practice

Take one target outlet and build a short file: what its editors have said they want, who covers the beat, and what the audit suggests about its actual output. Then pitch to that, and revisit the file each quarter as personnel and priorities shift. The relationship compounds because your next pitch reflects what you learned from the last one.

As a decision criterion: if your team's problem is a thin, rotating list of contacts, the cheat sheets and new-hire profiles do the most work. If the problem is pitches that miss, the editor interviews and audits are the better starting point. For broader context on how tech coverage is changing, Sam Whitmore Media Survey is the source itself; trade press such as PRWeek covers PR practice generally.

Which cheat sheets cover emerging topics like quantum computing or cybersecurity podcasts?

The cheat sheets you want sit in the site's Cheat Sheets section, and two recent examples map directly onto your question:

  • Cheat Sheet: Quantum Computing Targets (dated October 11, 2026) — a list of editorial targets for quantum coverage, with the site's own note that it may be "early" but expects the topic to expand in 2027.
  • Cheat Sheet: Cybersecurity Podcasts (updated) (dated September 23, 2026) — a podcast-focused list, alongside a separate Cheat Sheet: Quantum Computing Targets entry and a Cybersecurity-tagged item in the latest feed.

The same section also carries adjacent lists that help with emerging-tech pitching: CEO/Leadership Podcasts, CEO Profiles, Yahoo Finance Producers/Hosts, CNBC Producers, User Organizations (membership groups that may welcome research or inside knowledge), and a Contributed Content Gatekeepers sheet.

How to use them

These are target lists, not topic primers. If you're pitching quantum, use the Quantum Computing Targets sheet to pick editors, then read the site's Research items (such as its "SWMS Audit" of a publication) to understand how that outlet actually covers the space. For podcast outreach, the Cybersecurity Podcasts sheet tells you which shows to approach; pair it with the CEO/Leadership Podcasts list if your spokesperson is an executive rather than a security specialist.

Practical next step

Before pitching, check the update date on each sheet — several are marked "updated," and producer/host lists like CNBC and Yahoo Finance turn over slowly, so a stale sheet can still be useful but should be verified against the outlet's current staff page. For broader context on how tech editors work, Sam Whitmore Media Survey publishes interviews and strategy notes alongside these lists.

Related questions

More questions →
How Sam Whitmore Media Survey Helps Tech PR Pros Pitch More Effectively

Sam Whitmore Media Survey (mediasurvey.com) is a subscription research and analysis service for tech PR professionals, operating since 1998. It helps PR teams pitch more effectively by publishing interviews with business and technology editors, analyzing published coverage, and packaging both into practical formats—cheat sheets, strategy notes, and influencer profiles—that support day-to-day pitching and long-term media relationships. It is most useful for PR pros who already have a target list of tech and business outlets and want evidence-based guidance on who to approach, with what angle, and how to build a relationship beyond a single placement.

What the site actually produces

The site organizes its work into a few recurring content types, each serving a different pitching task:

Content type What it contains How a PR pro uses it
Research Empirical audits of publications (e.g., the "SWMS Audit" series, starting with VentureBeat) Understand what a publication actually covers, rather than what its brand suggests
Influencers Profiles of individual journalists and editors (e.g., "Out of the Gate" entries on Cade Metz of NYT, Erin Woo of WSJ, Micah Barkley of Bloomberg, Alex Eichenstein of The Information) Build a target list at the person level and track who is new to a beat
Cheat Sheets Curated lists of targets and contacts—cybersecurity podcasts, CNBC producers, Yahoo Finance producers/hosts, CEO/leadership podcasts, quantum computing targets, "gatekeepers," and membership-driven user organizations Shortcut list-building and identify where influence actually sits at an outlet
Strategies Pitching and relationship advice drawn from editor interviews and coverage analysis Adjust approach before sending a pitch
Contributed Content / Interviews / Events Editor commentary and event-based insight Supplement direct outreach with relationship-building context

The through-line is that the material is derived from editors themselves—the site states it interviews business and technology editors and publishes their advice and commentary—and from analysis of published work. That makes it closer to primary-source intelligence than to a media database.

How it supports more effective pitching

1. Pitching advice grounded in editor interviews

Rather than generic best practices, the site's value is that recommendations come from the editors receiving pitches. For a PR pro, this means you can check a target editor's stated preferences and priorities before writing. For example, if you are preparing a pitch to a business tech editor at a major outlet, the interview-based material tells you what that editor says they want—useful for choosing the angle and the supporting evidence you lead with.

2. Coverage analysis to guide story selection

The "SWMS Audit" feature is explicitly framed as a way "to help you see a publication empirically, the way it actually is." For pitching, that means matching your story to what an outlet demonstrably publishes, not to assumptions about its beat. A practical workflow: pick a target publication, review the audit and recent coverage analysis, then shape your pitch around the themes the outlet actually runs.

3. Cheat sheets for target and contact mapping

Cheat sheets compress list-building work. Examples from the site include CNBC producers, Yahoo Finance producers and hosts, cybersecurity podcasts, CEO/leadership podcasts, and quantum computing targets. The site notes some of these are updated periodically—the CNBC producers sheet, for instance, was described as having "scarcely any turnover" from the prior year, which is itself useful information: it tells you the contact map is stable and worth maintaining.

The "User Organizations" cheat sheet is a different kind of resource: it lists membership-driven organizations that "might welcome your research or access to inside knowledge." That is a route to third-party credibility rather than direct coverage—useful when a direct pitch is not landing.

4. Relationship-building over one-off hits

The site frames its purpose as helping PR pros "land coverage today and build relationships for the long run." The influencer profiles and editor interviews support this by giving you context on a journalist's career moves and interests—for instance, tracking journalists who are newly in a role ("Out of the Gate" entries) is a natural moment to introduce yourself with a relevant, low-pressure note rather than a cold pitch.

Where it fits—and where it doesn't

Best fit: tech PR practitioners and agencies with an existing media relations function, working beats like enterprise tech, cybersecurity, AI, and business technology, who want editor-sourced guidance and curated target lists.

Less relevant if: you need a contact database with emails and pitch distribution tools, real-time coverage alerts, or performance analytics. The site's own description centers on research, analysis, interviews, and cheat sheets—not on outreach software. Pricing and access terms are not specified in the available site material, so confirm subscription details directly before assuming cost or access level.

A realistic use pattern: treat it as a pre-pitch research layer. Before a campaign, pull the relevant cheat sheet to finalize targets, read the audit or coverage analysis for each priority outlet, check influencer notes for recent beat changes, and adjust your angle using the strategy material. Then pitch—and use the relationship guidance to plan follow-up beyond the first story.

The site has been publishing since 1998 and brands itself as "Tech Media Intelligence for the AI Era," which signals an emphasis on AI-adjacent coverage and targets—relevant if your clients sit in that space.

Does Sam Whitmore Media Survey Cover AI-Era Tech Media and Cybersecurity Topics?

Yes. Sam Whitmore Media Survey (mediasurvey.com) describes itself as "Tech Media Intelligence for the AI Era" and has published since 1998. Its visible content includes cybersecurity cheat sheets, quantum computing targets, CEO and leadership podcasts, and interviews with business and technology editors. It is written for tech PR professionals who want to pitch more effectively and build long-term relationships with journalists. If you are looking for general tech news or consumer cybersecurity advice, this is not that kind of site.

What the site actually covers

The site organizes its work into recurring sections: Research, Strategies, PR, Influencers, Contributed Content, Interviews, Events, and Cheat Sheets. The stated method is to interview business and technology editors, publish their advice, and analyze published work to show what gets covered and why.

Recent items visible on the homepage give a concrete sense of the mix:

Date Item Topic area
Oct 20, 2026 SWMS Audit: VentureBeat Publication analysis
Oct 20, 2026 Out of the Gate: Cade Metz, NYT; Erin Woo, WSJ Journalist profiles
Oct 11, 2026 Cheat Sheet: Quantum Computing Targets Emerging tech
Oct 13, 2026 Gatekeepers Cheat Sheet Editorial contacts
Sep 23, 2026 Cheat Sheet: Cybersecurity Podcasts (updated) Cybersecurity media
Sep 26, 2026 Cheat Sheet: Yahoo Finance Producers/Hosts Broadcast contacts
Sep 27, 2026 Cheat Sheet: CEO/Leadership Podcasts (updated) Executive media

So cybersecurity appears as a media-landscape topic—which podcasts and outlets cover it—rather than as security research or product guidance. The same applies to quantum computing: the cheat sheet frames it as an emerging beat expected to grow, not as a technical primer.

Who gets the most value

The content is aimed at tech PR and communications people. The site says its research and analysis "help tech PR pros pitch more effectively," and the cheat sheets are built around named editors, producers, hosts, and membership organizations that might welcome research or inside knowledge.

You will find it useful if you need to:

  • Identify which journalists and producers cover a beat before pitching.
  • Understand how a specific publication actually operates, as in the VentureBeat audit.
  • Track emerging beats such as quantum computing before they become crowded.
  • Find podcasts and executive-media venues where clients can appear.

It is less relevant if you want breaking tech news, product reviews, or hands-on cybersecurity guidance.

How to use it for a coverage decision

  1. Start with the Cheat Sheets index. Scan the list for your beat—cybersecurity, quantum, CEO media—and open the matching sheet. Expect named targets and short commentary rather than a database export.
  2. Read the relevant audit or "Out of the Gate" profile. These show how a publication or journalist works, which is the input for tailoring a pitch.
  3. Check the date on each item. Several sheets are marked "updated," and the homepage shows revision dates, so confirm you are working from the current version before building a contact list.
  4. Cross-check against the Strategies and Research sections. These explain the reasoning behind the targets, which helps you decide whether a given outlet fits your client's story.

A common snag: the cheat sheets are editorial guides, not live contact databases. Treat names and roles as a starting point and verify current assignments before you send anything.

What to expect on access and pricing

The provided site information does not state subscription prices, login requirements, or free-versus-paid access. The homepage shows headlines and short excerpts with "Read more" links, so some material may sit behind a click-through. Check the site directly before assuming any section is free or fully open.

Bottom line

If your job is placing tech stories and you care about AI-era media dynamics, cybersecurity coverage, and emerging beats, the site's beat-specific cheat sheets and publication audits are directly on point. If you need technical cybersecurity content or general tech news, look elsewhere.

What is Sam Whitmore Media Survey (mediasurvey.com)?

Sam Whitmore Media Survey (SWMS) is a research and analysis publication for technology PR professionals, running since 1998 and currently describing itself as "Tech Media Intelligence for the AI Era." It interviews business and technology editors, analyzes published work, and packages the results into advice aimed at helping PR people pitch more effectively and land coverage. If you work in tech communications and want to understand how editors actually think, this is the kind of resource the site positions itself as; if you're looking for general news or a consumer tech publication, it isn't that.

What the site actually publishes

The homepage organizes content into a few recurring categories, each with a distinct purpose:

  • Research — empirical looks at specific publications. A current example is the "SWMS Audit" series, which the site describes as an ongoing feature "to help you see a publication empirically, the way it actually is." The first entry covers VentureBeat.
  • Influencers — short interviews with journalists, often framed as "Out of the Gate" pieces with people such as Cade Metz (NYT), Erin Woo (WSJ), Micah Barkley (Bloomberg), and Alex Eichenstein (The Information).
  • Cheat Sheets — reference lists of targets and contacts. Recent examples include CEO/leadership podcasts, CEO profiles, Yahoo Finance producers and hosts, CNBC producers, cybersecurity podcasts, quantum computing targets, and "Gatekeepers."
  • Strategies and PR — advice-oriented material for pitching and relationship-building.
  • Contributed Content, Interviews, and Events — additional formats listed in the site's navigation.

Who it's for

The stated audience is tech PR pros. The content assumes you already know the beat and want tactical help: which producers to contact, which editors are newly in role, which topics are heating up. The cheat sheets are explicitly framed that way — for instance, the "User Organizations" sheet notes it doesn't identify edit targets per se but lists membership-driven organizations that "might welcome your research or access to inside knowledge."

A useful way to think about it: if your task is "find the right producer at CNBC" or "figure out which cybersecurity podcasts are worth pitching," a cheat sheet is the intended tool. If your task is "understand why an editor passed on my pitch," the interview and audit content is closer to the point.

How current is it, and what to expect

The material shown is dated through late 2026, with frequent updates — several cheat sheets carry "(updated)" labels and revision notes (e.g., "Scarcely any turnover from last year at this time" on the CNBC producers sheet). That cadence matters for PR work, since contact lists go stale quickly.

The site does not display pricing information or payment details in the material available, so whether full access requires a subscription isn't something that can be confirmed from the page itself. Treat access terms as something to verify directly rather than assume.

Practical takeaway

Use mediasurvey.com as a working reference for tech-media targeting: start with the cheat sheet closest to your beat, cross-check names against the dated update notes, and read the audit and influencer interviews when you need to understand a publication's actual interests rather than its stated coverage area. The value is in the specificity of the lists and the editor commentary, not in broad industry news.

What Are the Cheat Sheets on Sam Whitmore Media Survey?

Cheat Sheets on mediasurvey.com are SWMS's curated media-contact and target lists: each one gathers a specific group of journalists, producers, hosts, podcasts, or organizations in one place so tech PR pros can decide who to pitch and how. They are most useful when you already know the story you want to place and need to identify the right people or outlets — not as a general news feed. The site describes SWMS as producing research and analysis that helps tech PR pros pitch more effectively, and the Cheat Sheets sit alongside its Research, Strategies, PR, and Influencers sections.

What a Cheat Sheet contains

Based on the listings on the site, a Cheat Sheet is a named, dated post that consolidates a target set. The descriptions show two broad kinds:

  • People and outlet lists — named contacts at a publication or network, such as producers and hosts. Examples: Cheat Sheet: CNBC Producers (updated) and Cheat Sheet: Yahoo Finance Producers/Hosts.
  • Beat and format lists — where a topic or content format lives. Examples: Cheat Sheet: Cybersecurity Podcasts (updated), Cheat Sheet: CEO/Leadership Podcasts (updated), and Cheat Sheet: Quantum Computing Targets.

Some entries go beyond pure contact lists. Cheat Sheet: User Organizations is described as membership-driven organizations that "might welcome your research or access to inside knowledge" — i.e., not edit targets themselves, but potentially useful sources or audiences. Cheat Sheet: CEO Profiles (updated) discusses the editorial bias toward superstar CEOs and profiles 16 people, so it reads as guidance on how that coverage works as much as a list.

Types currently visible on the site

Cheat Sheet Date shown What it appears to cover
Gatekeepers Cheat Sheet Oct 13, 2026 Described as a new version of a "popular" cheat sheet
User Organizations Oct 11, 2026 Membership organizations that may welcome research or insider knowledge
Quantum Computing Targets Oct 11, 2026 Early-stage target list; the author expects quantum coverage to grow in 2027
CEO/Leadership Podcasts (updated) Sep 27, 2026 CEO and leadership podcasts collected in one place
CEO Profiles (updated) Sep 27, 2026 16 CEO profiles, with commentary on coverage bias
Yahoo Finance Producers/Hosts Sep 26, 2026 Video-side contacts at Yahoo Finance
CNBC Producers (updated) Sep 24, 2026 CNBC producer contacts; noted as little turnover year over year
Cybersecurity Podcasts (updated) Sep 23, 2026 Cybersecurity podcast targets

The "View all" link under Cheat Sheets indicates the visible items are a subset of a larger archive.

How often they are updated

Several titles carry "(updated)," and the dates on those revised versions cluster in late September 2026, with newer entries in October 2026. The CNBC Producers entry notes "scarcely any turnover from last year at this time," which tells you the update cadence is roughly annual for some lists and that change between versions can be small. Practical implication: check the date on a Cheat Sheet before relying on a name, and treat older, non-updated entries as more likely to be stale.

When to use one

  • You have a story and need a target list. Start with the beat or format list (e.g., cybersecurity podcasts) to find where the topic is covered, then use people lists (e.g., CNBC producers) to identify who to approach.
  • You are planning around a rising topic. The Quantum Computing Targets sheet is explicitly framed as early — useful for getting ahead of a beat rather than reacting to it.
  • You want non-media placement or sourcing. The User Organizations sheet points to membership groups rather than editors.
  • You are preparing a CEO or leadership pitch. The podcast and CEO-profile sheets address that specific, crowded category.

Limits to keep in mind

The site does not state pricing, subscription terms, or whether full Cheat Sheet contents are accessible without an account, so don't assume the lists are free to read in full — the public pages show titles, dates, and short descriptions. The descriptions are also written in the author's voice and sometimes include editorial opinion (for example, the note that the Gatekeepers version is "our best yet"), so treat framing as commentary and verify individual contacts against the outlet itself before pitching.

What Content Sections Are Available on mediasurvey.com?

mediasurvey.com is the site of Sam Whitmore's Media Survey (SWMS), a research and analysis service for tech PR professionals that has operated since 1998. Its content is organized into several sections—Research, PR, Strategies, Influencers, Interviews, Events, Contributed Content, and Cheat Sheets—each aimed at helping PR practitioners understand tech publications and pitch them more effectively. The sections are best understood by what they help you do: analyze a publication, prepare a pitch, or track people and events.

Research

This section contains empirical analysis of publications and the people who work at them. The flagship example is the SWMS Audit, described on the site as "an ongoing feature to help you see a publication empirically, the way it actually is." A featured audit covers VentureBeat. If you want to understand a target outlet's actual coverage behavior rather than its stated mission, this is the section to start with.

PR and Strategies

These two sections carry practical guidance for pitching and relationship-building. The site frames its overall output as research and analysis that "helps tech PR pros pitch more effectively," and says it interviews business and technology editors and publishes their advice and commentary, alongside analysis of published work intended to help land coverage today and build relationships for the long run. PR and Strategies are where that editor-sourced advice and tactical insight sit.

Influencers

This section profiles journalists and editors—particularly those new to a beat or a publication. Recent entries include "Out of the Gate" pieces on Cade Metz (NYT) and Erin Woo (WSJ), and on Micah Barkley (Bloomberg) and Alex Eichenstein (The Information). Use it to identify who is newly covering your space before you pitch.

Cheat Sheets

Cheat Sheets are the site's most concrete resource: curated lists of targets, producers, hosts, and podcasts. Examples visible on the site include:

Cheat Sheet What it covers
Gatekeepers Cheat Sheet (Oct. 2026) Editors and gatekeepers worth knowing
User Organizations Membership-driven organizations that may welcome research or inside knowledge
Quantum Computing Targets Early-stage list of quantum-focused edit targets
CEO/Leadership Podcasts (updated) CEO and leadership podcasts in one place
CEO Profiles (updated) 16 profiled CEOs, with commentary on bias toward superstar CEOs
Yahoo Finance Producers/Hosts Where influence sits in Yahoo's video activity
CNBC Producers (updated) Producer list, with little turnover noted year over year
Cybersecurity Podcasts (updated) Podcast targets in security

Several are marked "updated," so check the date on each before relying on it.

Interviews, Events, and Contributed Content

  • Interviews: conversations with business and technology editors, published as advice and commentary.
  • Events: listings related to the tech media and PR community.
  • Contributed Content: outside contributions, such as the October 2026 Gatekeepers Cheat Sheet published under this label.

How to Choose a Section

  • Researching an unfamiliar outlet → Research (SWMS Audit).
  • Building a target list → Cheat Sheets, matched to your beat (e.g., cybersecurity podcasts or CNBC producers).
  • Preparing an actual pitch → PR and Strategies, plus the relevant Influencers entry for the reporter.
  • Tracking new beat reporters → Influencers.

The site does not publish pricing or access details in the material available here, so whether any section sits behind a subscription is not established—verify on the site before planning around a specific resource.

Website Overview

An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality. Several search or sharing settings need attention. Together they may make snippets, preview images or preferred URLs less consistent across platforms.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 1998, this domain has about 28 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The registrar is Porkbun LLC, a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by porkbun.com, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the mailchannels.net email service. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown. TXT records include verification markers for Google. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate issuer is DigiCert Inc, a commercial certificate authority. The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate is valid for about 198 days in total, with 160 days remaining.

HTTP and Browser Security

The response lacks these common security headers: CSP, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies Apache without an exact version. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Google Analytics, Apache without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

No homepage meta description was detected, leaving snippet selection more dependent on page text. No homepage canonical URL was detected. If duplicate URLs exist, consolidation may be less explicit. No Open Graph metadata was detected, so social previews may depend on platform inference. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity. The title has 57 characters, within a common display range.

Hosting and Email

DNSporkbun.com
Hostingbranchcms.com
Emailmailchannels.net
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagUnited States Inferred 75.2.117.16

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarPorkbun LLC
Registered1998-05-08
Expires2027-05-07
Domain statusclient delete prohibited、client transfer prohibited
Nameserverscuritiba.ns.porkbun.com、fortaleza.ns.porkbun.com、maceio.ns.porkbun.com、salvador.ns.porkbun.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Aa50ec0938559130bb.awsglobalaccelerator.com75.2.117.16300—
Aa50ec0938559130bb.awsglobalaccelerator.com99.83.165.185300—
MXmediasurvey.commx1.mailchannels.net6000
MXmediasurvey.commx2.mailchannels.net6000
NSmediasurvey.comcuritiba.ns.porkbun.com86400—
NSmediasurvey.comfortaleza.ns.porkbun.com86400—
NSmediasurvey.commaceio.ns.porkbun.com86400—
NSmediasurvey.comsalvador.ns.porkbun.com86400—
TXTmediasurvey.comgoogle-site-verification=oMeobvK2AVwNo8QBbif3iTkg4Vqum2Sh0EJnv2csxjA600—
TXTmediasurvey.comv=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all600—
CNAMEwww.mediasurvey.comsites.branchcms.com600—
DMARC_dmarc.mediasurvey.comv=DMARC1; p=none;600—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectwww.mediasurvey.com
IssuerDigiCert Inc
Valid until2027-04-03T23:59 · Remaining when checked: 160 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
cache-controlno-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
serverApache
strict-transport-securitymax-age=2592000
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
referrer-policyno-referrer-when-downgrade

Identified technologies

Google AnalyticsApache

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionNot detected
Canonical URLNot detected
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter CardNot detected

Unknown

No rules found

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.