Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

radiocarbon.com

Radiocarbon dating lab SGS Beta provides high-quality AMS dating results in 3-14 business days. The laboratory also provides stable isotope analysis.

No paid content found Multilingual
Visit website
Profile views 0 Outbound visits 0 Normal
SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service, Stable Isotope Analysis Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Business Services
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
1996
Hosting
Amazon.com, Inc.Inferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service used for?

SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service is a laboratory service for determining the age of carbon-bearing materials using radiocarbon (carbon-14) analysis, with AMS dating as its main technique. It is used by archaeologists, geologists, paleontologists, forensic researchers and cultural-heritage specialists who need a calendar-age estimate for an organic or carbonate sample.

Its practical uses follow the sample types the lab lists:

  • Bones and teeth — dating human or animal remains, burial contexts and faunal assemblages.
  • Shell and other carbonates — marine, lacustrine and cave deposits such as shells, speleothems and carbonate sediments.
  • Plants and seeds — agricultural origins, diet, vegetation history and directly dated crop remains.
  • Wood — construction timbers, artifacts, charcoal and tree-ring-related studies.

The service also includes stable isotope analysis, which is used less for dating and more for reconstructing diet, migration, climate and environmental conditions from the same or related materials.

Who it suits

If you are an archaeologist dating a single bone or a museum curator verifying a wooden object, the value is a specialist lab that handles pretreatment, measurement and reporting rather than a general analytical facility. Researchers running multi-sample projects benefit from technical support in choosing which samples are most suitable before submission.

A practical next step

Before contacting the lab, list your sample type, approximate quantity, context and the precision you need. The lab's own guidance emphasizes selecting the most suitable samples with expert technical support, so an initial consultation can prevent wasted time on material that will not produce a reliable date. Turnaround is quoted in business days, so plan fieldwork and publication deadlines around that window, and check the published holiday and lab-closure schedule before shipping samples.

How long does it take to get AMS radiocarbon dating results?

AMS radiocarbon results from SGS Beta are advertised as returning in 3–14 business days, depending on the service level you choose and how straightforward the sample is to prepare. Standard turnaround sits at the slower end of that window; expedited handling moves a result toward the 3-day side, and complex materials such as bone or carbonate can take longer because they need chemical pretreatment before they ever reach the accelerator.

What actually drives the clock

  • Pretreatment, not just measurement. The AMS measurement itself is fast. Most of the elapsed time goes into cleaning, sieving, acid or alkali washes, and converting the sample to graphite.
  • Sample type. The lab groups its work by material — bones and teeth, shell and other carbonates, plants and seeds, wood — and each category has its own preparation protocol.
  • Queue position. A lab's published window assumes normal volume. Holiday closures, which this lab posts publicly, push everything back.
  • Your paperwork. Incomplete provenance or ambiguous context forms stall a job before analysis begins.

Choosing a turnaround

If you are writing a report with a fixed deadline, order the fastest service you can justify and submit the sample well before the deadline, not on it. If you are building a site chronology across dozens of samples, standard turnaround with a batch submission is usually the better trade: you spend less per date and accept a longer wait.

A practical rule: ask the lab to confirm the turnaround in writing for your specific sample type before you ship, because "3–14 business days" is a range, not a promise.

For comparison, other established labs publish their own windows — SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service is the one referenced here, and University of Waikato Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory is a commonly used alternative for Pacific and Southern Hemisphere work, where a local calibration curve matters.

What types of samples can be submitted for radiocarbon dating?

Radiocarbon dating services such as SGS Beta accept a broad range of carbon-bearing materials, with the main categories being bones and teeth, shells and other carbonates, plants and seeds, and wood. The common requirement across all of them is that the sample contains carbon that was once part of a living organism or formed in equilibrium with the atmosphere.

Main sample categories

  • Bones and teeth: Animal and human remains, including collagen extracted from bone. These are common in archaeology and forensics, though preservation strongly affects success.
  • Shell and other carbonates: Marine and freshwater shells, coral, and carbonate deposits such as speleothems. Marine samples require a reservoir correction because ocean carbon ages differ from atmospheric carbon.
  • Plants and seeds: Charred seeds, grain, nutshells, peat, and other plant remains. Single seeds or short-lived plants give the most precise ages because they capture a narrow time window.
  • Wood and charcoal: Timber, charcoal, and wooden artifacts. Wood can be long-lived, so the dated ring may predate the tree's felling or use by decades or centuries.

Practical considerations

The best sample depends on what question you are asking. If you need to date a specific event, choose material with a short lifespan, such as a seed or a twig, rather than a long-lived timber. If you are dating bone, collagen preservation matters more than the bone's size. For shells and carbonates, expect to apply a local reservoir correction, and provide context about where the sample was found.

Contamination is the most common reason for a failed or misleading result. Rootlets, museum consolidants, and carbonate coatings can all introduce younger or older carbon, so clean, well-provenanced samples are worth the extra effort. Where possible, submit a sample with known context and, if budget allows, a second material from the same deposit for cross-checking.

As a next step, decide whether your material is organic (bone, plant, wood, charcoal) or carbonate (shell, coral), then check the lab's sample submission guidance for minimum size and pretreatment. For broader context on radiocarbon methods and standards, see SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service, Stable Isotope Analysis.

How do I prepare and submit a sample for carbon dating?

Start by matching your sample type to the lab's published preparation guidance, then submit only the cleaned, documented material the lab asks for. For the SGS Beta service, the page organizes accepted materials into groups such as bones and teeth, shell and other carbonates, plants and seeds, and wood — a signal that preparation differs by material, so check the specific category before you mail anything.

A practical preparation sequence

  1. Identify the material precisely. "Bone," "charcoal," "shell" and "wood" each carry different contamination risks and different pretreatment needs. Note species, context and whether the sample is burnt, waterlogged or mineralized.
  2. Clean and subsample. Remove obvious soil, roots, and foreign organic matter with tools dedicated to that sample. Avoid touching the dating portion with bare hands; skin oils add modern carbon.
  3. Dry it properly. Air-dry or oven-dry at low temperature according to the lab's instructions. Seal it in a clean, inert container — a labeled plastic bag or foil wrap — and avoid paper or cotton that could transfer carbon.
  4. Label and document. Include a unique sample ID, depth or stratigraphic position, site, collector, date, and any treatment already applied (acid wash, conservation, glue). This matters because pretreatments and consolidants change what the result actually dates.
  5. Complete the submission form. The lab needs your contact details, sample descriptions, and any requested analysis options. Keep a copy for your records.
  6. Package and ship. Use rigid outer packaging, include the paperwork inside, and follow the lab's shipping and customs guidance. For international shipments, declare the contents accurately; archaeological and geological materials can attract border scrutiny.
  7. Track turnaround and closures. This lab advertises AMS results in roughly 3–14 business days, but published holiday closures — such as the November and late-December dates on its site — will shift that window. Plan fieldwork and reporting deadlines around them.

Choosing what to send

Situation Sensible approach
Single charcoal fragment from a hearth Submit the fragment with context notes; ask about acid-base-acid pretreatment
Bone with possible conservation Disclose every treatment; ask whether collagen extraction is viable
Shell or carbonate Flag the mineralogy; marine reservoir effects may need separate consideration
Wood with many rings Identify whether you want a specific ring sequence or bulk date

A concrete reader scenario

Suppose you are a field archaeologist with a charred seed and a piece of antler from the same pit. Send them as two separate, individually labeled submissions rather than one combined bag. If the seed returns a date that conflicts with the stratigraphy, the antler gives you an independent check, and the lab can tell you whether the antler needed collagen extraction. Combining them destroys that option.

For material-specific preparation details, cross-check the lab's own sample guidance at SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service, Stable Isotope Analysis before shipping, and confirm current turnaround and closure dates with the lab directly.

What is the difference between radiocarbon dating and stable isotope analysis?

Radiocarbon dating tells you when a once-living thing died; stable isotope analysis tells you what that organism ate, drank, or how its environment looked. They are different measurements, often run on the same sample, and they answer different questions.

The core difference

Radiocarbon dating Stable isotope analysis
What it measures The decay of radioactive carbon-14 Ratios of stable isotopes such as carbon-13, nitrogen-15, oxygen-18
Main question How old is this material? What was the diet, climate, or environment?
Does the result change over time? Yes—the signal decays with age No—the ratio stays fixed after the tissue forms
Typical output A date range in years before present Ratio values, often compared against reference standards
Typical samples Wood, charcoal, bone, shell, seeds, teeth Bone collagen, teeth enamel, shell carbonate, plant tissue

Radiocarbon dating works only on material that was once alive and is younger than roughly 50,000 years. Stable isotope analysis has no such age limit and can be applied to far older material, including fossils and inorganic carbonates.

How they work together

A researcher might submit a bone to a lab for both. The radiocarbon result places the bone in time; the stable isotope values suggest whether the person or animal ate marine fish, terrestrial meat, or plants. Neither measurement alone gives that combined picture. For a site with mixed material, dating the seeds and analyzing isotopes from bone can build a more reliable reconstruction than either method separately.

Choosing between them

  • Ask "when?" → radiocarbon dating.
  • Ask "what diet, climate, or migration pattern?" → stable isotope analysis.
  • Ask both → request both on suitable material, since sample preparation differs and not every material works for both.

SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service offers both radiocarbon dating and stable isotope analysis, with the page noting AMS results in 3–14 business days. If you have a mixed batch of samples, the practical next step is to contact the lab with your material types and research questions before submitting, because sample suitability and pretreatment requirements vary by material and method. For general background on radiocarbon methods, SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service, Stable Isotope Analysis is the relevant service page.

How much does radiocarbon dating cost and how do I pay?

Radiocarbon dating cost depends mainly on the sample type, the analysis method, and turnaround time. The site itself does not publish a price list or online payment details; its pricing signals point to “subscribe” and “pricing” as keywords but no pricing or payment links. So treat any specific dollar figure you see elsewhere as an estimate, not a confirmed rate from this lab.

What drives the price

  • AMS vs. radiocarbon counting. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) usually costs more per sample because it needs less material and gives faster, more precise results. Conventional radiocarbon dating is often cheaper but slower and needs larger samples.
  • Sample pretreatment. Bones, teeth, shell, carbonates, plants, seeds and wood each need different cleaning and chemical pretreatment. That work is part of the quoted cost.
  • Turnaround time. Standard service is quoted at 3–14 business days. Rush or expedited handling normally adds a fee.
  • Number of samples. A single sample is often charged at a higher per-sample rate; batches can reduce the per-sample cost.
  • Stable isotope analysis. If you add stable isotope analysis alongside dating, expect an additional charge because it is a separate measurement.

How payment usually works

Most radiocarbon labs, including this type of service, issue a quote or invoice after you submit sample details. Payment is typically made by bank transfer, credit card, or institutional purchase order, and many labs require payment before or at the time results are released. Because the site does not list payment platforms or checkout links, the practical route is to request a quote first, then confirm accepted payment methods with the lab directly.

A concrete next step

Before shipping anything, gather the following and ask for a written quote:

  • Sample type and approximate amount (e.g., 2 g of bone, 10 mg of charcoal)
  • Whether you need AMS or standard dating
  • Your required turnaround time
  • Whether you want stable isotope analysis added
  • Your billing details (institution, purchase order, or card)

For comparison, other labs publish pricing more openly: SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service, Stable Isotope Analysis is the lab in question, while Beta Analytic is its related brand. You can also check University of Waikato Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory and University of Arizona AMS Laboratory for published rate examples. Use those only as rough benchmarks, because pretreatment and turnaround vary.

If cost is the deciding factor, ask each lab for a quote using the exact same sample description and turnaround. That comparison is more reliable than any general price range.

Related questions

More questions →
How to Choose a Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory and Submit Samples

Choose a radiocarbon dating laboratory by matching three things to your project: the dating method (AMS vs. radiometric), the turnaround time you can accept, and the sample types the lab will pretreat and run. SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service, for example, states that it provides AMS dating results in 3–14 business days and also offers stable isotope analysis — a useful benchmark when you compare other labs. Before you ship anything, confirm the lab accepts your material, ask what pretreatment is included, and check the published closure schedule, because holiday shutdowns can add weeks to your result date.

Compare labs on the dimensions that change your result

Method, turnaround, and sample size are linked. AMS (accelerator mass spectrometry) counts carbon-14 atoms directly and needs far less material than radiometric dating, which counts decay events over a longer period. If your sample is small, precious, or you need an answer quickly, AMS is usually the deciding factor. If you have a large, robust sample and no deadline pressure, radiometric counting may be offered as an alternative — but confirm the lab still runs it, since many facilities have consolidated onto AMS.

Dimension What to ask Why it matters
Method AMS or radiometric? Determines minimum sample size and typical turnaround
Turnaround Standard vs. rush, in business days SGS Beta advertises 3–14 business days for AMS
Sample size Minimum grams/ milligrams per material Too little material means rejection or a re-run
Pretreatment Included or extra? Removes contaminants that skew the age
Reporting Calibration, error range, delta-13C Needed to interpret and publish the date
Schedule Holiday/lab closures A closure can push your result past your deadline

Check accepted sample types and pretreatment

Labs publish the materials they routinely handle. The SGS Beta page lists technical support for selecting suitable samples and names Bones & Teeth, Shell & other Carbonates, Plants & Seeds, and Wood among its categories. Use that list as a checklist against your own material:

  • Bone and teeth — usually need collagen extraction; ask whether the lab reports collagen yield, since low yield signals a unreliable date.
  • Shell and other carbonates — sensitive to recrystallization; ask about acid pretreatment and whether the lab checks for secondary carbonate.
  • Plants, seeds, and charcoal — often the cleanest material; confirm whether the lab picks out rootlets or other intrusions.
  • Wood — ask whether the lab can date a single growth ring or must run a bulk sample, since that affects precision.

If your material is not on the lab's published list, email a description and photo before shipping. A lab that has not pretreated your sample type before may still accept it, but you want that confirmed in writing.

Understand what drives the price before you request a quote

Pricing is quoted per project, not published as a flat rate on the page reviewed here. The factors that typically move a quote:

  1. Number of samples — per-sample cost usually drops with batch size.
  2. Pretreatment — collagen extraction, carbonate leaching, or specific chemical washes are often billed separately from the measurement.
  3. Rush service — expedited turnaround carries a premium.
  4. Re-runs — if a sample fails or is contaminated, you may pay again; ask about the lab's policy.

Request a written quote that itemizes measurement, pretreatment, and any rush fee, and ask what happens if the sample yields no result.

Prepare and label samples to avoid rejection

Most bad outcomes trace back to contamination or mislabeling, not to the measurement itself.

  • Do not touch the sample with bare hands; skin oils add modern carbon.
  • Use clean packaging — foil, glass, or lab-supplied vials. Avoid paper and cotton, which can transfer carbon.
  • Label inside and outside the container with a unique ID, and keep a matching list of what each ID is, where it came from, and its depth/context.
  • Dry samples if the lab requests it, and note any preservative or treatment already applied.
  • Ship with the lab's required forms so the sample is logged on arrival.

Confirm reporting and schedule before you ship

Ask what the final report includes: the conventional radiocarbon age, the calibrated date range, the delta-13C value, and the error margin. Calibration matters because the raw radiocarbon age must be converted to a calendar date using a calibration curve, and the curve you use depends on the material and region.

Then check the calendar. The SGS Beta page publishes a 2026 closure schedule: November 19, November 26–27 (Thanksgiving), and December 24, 2026 through January 1, 2027 inclusive for Christmas and New Year. If your deadline falls near those dates, either ship well ahead or confirm the lab's cutoff for samples received before the closure. A sample that arrives the day before a shutdown may not be logged until the lab reopens, adding the full closure period to your turnaround.

A practical submission sequence

  1. Identify your sample material and estimate its size.
  2. Shortlist two or three labs that accept that material and offer AMS.
  3. Request quotes with pretreatment and rush options itemized.
  4. Compare turnaround against your deadline, including published closures.
  5. Confirm reporting format and calibration.
  6. Package, label, and ship with the required forms.
  7. Track receipt and confirm the expected result date in writing.

If a lab cannot confirm pretreatment for your material, cannot give a written turnaround, or will not state what the report contains, that is a reason to look elsewhere — regardless of price.

What Is Radiocarbon Dating and How Does It Work?

Radiocarbon dating estimates the age of once-living material by measuring how much carbon-14 remains in a sample. It works because living things constantly absorb carbon from the atmosphere, and that intake stops at death, after which carbon-14 decays at a known rate. It applies to organic remains and some carbonates up to roughly 50,000 years old, and the practical accuracy depends heavily on sample type, sample size, and freedom from contamination. If your material is organic or carbonate-based and falls within that age range, radiocarbon dating is likely applicable; if it is older, inorganic (non-carbonate), or heavily contaminated, it is not.

The core mechanism: carbon-14 formation, uptake, and decay

Carbon-14 is produced in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays interact with nitrogen. The resulting carbon-14 combines with oxygen to form carbon dioxide, which mixes into the atmosphere and enters the food chain through photosynthesis and feeding.

While an organism is alive, its carbon-14 level stays roughly in equilibrium with the atmosphere. When it dies, uptake stops and the carbon-14 already present begins to decay into nitrogen-14 at a fixed rate.

Half-life and the dating window

  • Half-life: about 5,730 years. After one half-life, half the original carbon-14 remains; after two, a quarter; and so on.
  • Practical limit: roughly 50,000 years. Beyond about 10 half-lives, too little carbon-14 remains to measure reliably, which is why radiocarbon dating cannot reach into the millions of years that other methods (such as potassium-argon) cover.

Because the decay rate is constant, measuring the remaining carbon-14 relative to stable carbon tells you how long decay has been running — that is, how long ago the organism died.

How the measurement is done: AMS vs. traditional methods

Two broad approaches exist, and they differ mainly in sensitivity and sample size.

Method How it works Sample size Typical use
Radiometric (beta counting) Detects decay events over time Relatively large Older, larger samples
AMS (accelerator mass spectrometry) Counts carbon-14 atoms directly Very small Small or precious samples

AMS is more commonly used today because it can date much smaller samples and generally returns results faster. SGS Beta, for example, describes providing AMS dating results in 3–14 business days, which reflects the speed advantage of direct atom counting over waiting for decay events.

What samples can be dated

Radiocarbon dating applies to material that once exchanged carbon with the environment. Based on the laboratory's listed sample categories, common types include:

  • Bones & teeth — datable via the organic (collagen) fraction
  • Shell & other carbonates — datable because carbonate incorporates environmental carbon
  • Plants & seeds — direct products of photosynthesis
  • Wood — a classic and often reliable sample type

The key requirement is that the carbon in the sample is original to the organism and has not been replaced or contaminated since death.

Limits, calibration, and common pitfalls

Radiocarbon dating is not a simple "read the number" process. Several factors affect the result:

  • Calibration: Atmospheric carbon-14 levels have varied over time, so raw "radiocarbon years" must be converted to calendar years using a calibration curve. An uncalibrated date is not a calendar date.
  • Contamination: Even small amounts of younger or older carbon can shift results. Handling, storage, and pretreatment matter, which is why laboratories apply sample-specific preparation.
  • Sample size: Traditional methods need larger samples; AMS reduces this requirement but does not eliminate it.
  • Age ceiling: Samples near or beyond ~50,000 years yield "beyond limit" results rather than a precise age.
  • Material suitability: Non-carbonate inorganic materials and samples with no original carbon cannot be dated by this method.

Deciding whether it fits your sample

Use these conditions to judge applicability:

  • Yes, likely suitable: organic material (bone, tooth, shell, plant, seed, wood) with intact original carbon, within ~50,000 years, and enough material for the chosen method.
  • No, not suitable: material older than the dating limit, non-carbonate inorganic material, or samples so contaminated that original carbon cannot be isolated.

If your sample is small or valuable, AMS is generally the better fit. If you are unsure, a laboratory's technical support can help match the sample to the right preparation and method — SGS Beta explicitly offers expert technical support for selecting the most suitable samples.

What Is Carbon Dating and How Does Radiocarbon Dating Work?

Carbon dating, also called radiocarbon dating, estimates the age of once-living material by measuring how much carbon-14 remains in a sample. It works because living things continually take in carbon from their environment, including a small amount of radioactive carbon-14, and that intake stops when they die. From that point, the carbon-14 decays at a known rate, so the remaining amount acts as a clock. The method is most useful for organic materials and carbonates up to roughly 50,000 years old, and modern labs typically measure the carbon-14 using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS).

The Principle Behind Carbon Dating

Carbon-14 is created in the upper atmosphere and cycles into plants through photosynthesis and into animals through the food chain. While an organism is alive, its carbon-14 level stays roughly in balance with the atmosphere. When it dies, no new carbon-14 is added, and the existing carbon-14 begins to decay into nitrogen-14.

The decay is steady and measurable: carbon-14 has a half-life of about 5,730 years. That means after one half-life, half of the original carbon-14 remains; after two, a quarter remains, and so on. A lab measures the ratio of remaining carbon-14 to stable carbon and calculates an estimated age from that ratio.

From Measurement to Age Estimate

The calculation is not a simple raw count. Labs calibrate radiocarbon results against known reference records, such as tree rings and other independently dated materials, to convert the measured carbon-14 into a calendar-age estimate. This is why a reported radiocarbon age and a calibrated calendar age can differ.

What Samples Can Be Dated

Radiocarbon dating applies to materials that once exchanged carbon with the environment. According to the SGS Beta Carbon Dating Service, common sample categories include:

Sample type Examples
Bones & teeth Animal and human remains
Shell & other carbonates Shell, coral, and similar carbonate materials
Plants & seeds Plant remains, seeds, and other botanical material
Wood Charcoal, timber, and wooden artifacts

The lab notes that expert technical support helps clients analyze the most suitable samples, which matters because sample type, preservation, and contamination all affect whether a reliable date can be produced.

How AMS Dating Fits In

Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is a common modern technique for measuring radiocarbon. Instead of waiting for radioactive decay events to accumulate, AMS counts carbon-14 atoms directly. This generally allows smaller samples to be dated than older decay-counting methods, and it is the approach many radiocarbon laboratories use for routine work.

SGS Beta states that it provides AMS dating results in 3–14 business days, which gives a sense of the turnaround a client can expect from a commercial lab.

Practical Age Range and Limitations

Carbon dating has boundaries worth knowing before submitting a sample:

  • Upper limit: Because carbon-14 decays away, samples older than roughly 50,000 years generally retain too little for a reliable measurement.
  • Contamination: Added or removed carbon from the environment can shift results, so sample selection and pretreatment matter.
  • Material type: Only materials that once took in carbon can be dated this way; rocks and minerals that never incorporated carbon-14 are not suitable.
  • Calibration: Raw radiocarbon measurements are converted to calendar ages using calibration curves, so the reported age depends on that step.

Planning Around Lab Schedules

If you are preparing to submit samples, it helps to check a lab's operating calendar. SGS Beta publishes a 2026 holiday and lab closure schedule, including closures around November 19, November 26–27 (Thanksgiving), and December 24, 2026 through January 1, 2027 for Christmas and New Year. Factoring these dates in can prevent unexpected delays in turnaround.

For anyone trying to understand an archaeological, geological, or forensic timeline, carbon dating remains a core tool: it turns the steady decay of carbon-14 into a measurable estimate of age for bones, teeth, shells, plants, seeds, and wood.

What Is AMS Dating and How Does It Differ from Standard Radiocarbon Dating?

AMS dating (accelerator mass spectrometry dating) is a radiocarbon method that counts individual carbon-14 atoms rather than waiting for them to decay. The practical result: it needs milligrams of sample instead of grams, which makes it the default choice for small, rare, or valuable materials. It suits bone, teeth, shell, plant, seed, wood, and charcoal — but only when the sample still contains enough original carbon and hasn't been contaminated. SGS Beta, the lab behind radiocarbon.com, reports AMS results in 3–14 business days.

How AMS dating measures carbon-14

Both AMS and conventional radiocarbon dating rely on the same principle: living things absorb carbon-14 while alive, and that carbon-14 decays at a known rate after death. The difference is how the remaining carbon-14 is measured.

  • Conventional radiocarbon dating detects the radiation released as carbon-14 atoms decay. Because decays are infrequent, the method needs a relatively large sample and long counting times to get a statistically usable signal.
  • AMS dating uses an accelerator mass spectrometer to separate and count carbon-14 atoms directly. It measures atoms, not decay events, so far fewer atoms are needed for a result.

That single change — counting atoms instead of waiting for decays — is what drives nearly every practical advantage of AMS.

Why AMS needs far smaller samples

Because AMS counts atoms directly, the sample size drops from grams to milligrams. This matters in three common situations:

  1. The sample is small or precious. A single seed, a fragment of bone, a sliver of wood, or a few shell fragments may be all that survives. Conventional dating could consume or require more material than exists.
  2. The sample is rare or museum-held. When you cannot sacrifice a large piece, AMS lets you date a small subsample.
  3. You need to isolate a specific fraction. Small samples make it feasible to target a particular component (for example, a specific organic fraction) rather than dating bulk material.

The trade-off is that smaller samples are more sensitive to contamination. A tiny amount of modern carbon — from handling, storage, or the burial environment — can shift an AMS result more than it would a large conventional sample. Clean collection and honest disclosure of how a sample was stored are part of getting a reliable date.

Sample types commonly dated by AMS

SGS Beta lists technical support for selecting the most suitable samples and names several categories:

Sample type Notes for AMS suitability
Bones & teeth Often dated via a specific extracted fraction; small fragments can be viable
Shell & other carbonates Carbonate material; needs care because of environmental exchange
Plants & seeds Single seeds or small plant fragments are typical AMS targets
Wood Small wood fragments or individual growth features can be dated
Charcoal Frequently submitted; small pieces are well suited to AMS

The lab's guidance is to analyze the most suitable samples with expert technical support — meaning the right pretreatment and fraction choice depends on the material, not just its size.

Turnaround time and precision expectations

SGS Beta states AMS dating results are delivered in 3–14 business days. Precision depends on the sample, its carbon content, and how clean it is; AMS itself does not guarantee a tighter date than conventional dating — it mainly reduces the sample size required. Plan around the lab's closure schedule if your deadline is tight: the posted 2026 closures include November 19, November 26–27 (Thanksgiving), and December 24, 2026 through January 1, 2027 (all dates inclusive) for Christmas and New Year.

Key limits and pitfalls

  • Contamination. Small AMS samples are more vulnerable to introduced modern or old carbon. How a sample was collected, handled, and stored affects the result.
  • Calibration. A measured radiocarbon age is not a calendar date. It must be calibrated, and the calibration you use affects the final range.
  • Material-dependent pretreatment. Bone, shell, plant, wood, and charcoal each need different treatment; the wrong fraction can produce a misleading date.
  • Not everything can be dated. Material without sufficient original carbon, or that has exchanged carbon with the environment, may not yield a meaningful result.

Choosing between AMS and conventional dating

Choose AMS when the sample is small, rare, valuable, or when you need to isolate a specific fraction. Choose conventional radiocarbon dating when you have ample material and the larger sample size is not a constraint — it can be the more economical route for bulk material. If you are unsure, the deciding questions are: how much material can you spare, and how confident are you that it is uncontaminated? Those two answers usually settle the method.

Website Overview

Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 1996, this domain has about 30 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The registrar is GoDaddy.com, LLC, a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by Amazon Route 53, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Microsoft 365 email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate issuer is Sectigo Limited, a commercial certificate authority. The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate is valid for about 198 days in total, with 158 days remaining.

HTTP and Browser Security

The Server header exposes the software version: Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu). This makes version-targeted checks easier, but is not proof of an exploitable vulnerability. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. All six checked browser-security headers are present. Their effectiveness still depends on the policy values and application behavior. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies All in One SEO Pro (AIOSEO) 5.0.3, WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Apache 2.4.52, with exact versions exposed for 2 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

The Generator tag identifies All in One SEO Pro (AIOSEO) 5.0.3, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. Twitter Card metadata is configured. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity. The page declares 10 language or regional alternatives using hreflang. The title has 55 characters, within a common display range.

Hosting and Email

DNSAmazon Route 53
HostingAmazon.com, Inc.
EmailMicrosoft 365
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagUnited States Inferred 13.59.0.80

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarGoDaddy.com, LLC
Registered1996-03-26
Expires2029-03-27
Domain statusclient delete prohibited、client renew prohibited、client transfer prohibited、client update prohibited
Nameserversns-1483.awsdns-57.org、ns-1932.awsdns-49.co.uk、ns-506.awsdns-63.com、ns-528.awsdns-02.net
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Awww.radiocarbon.com13.59.0.80300—
MXradiocarbon.comradiocarbon-com.mail.protection.outlook.com360010
NSradiocarbon.comns-1483.awsdns-57.org172800—
NSradiocarbon.comns-1932.awsdns-49.co.uk172800—
NSradiocarbon.comns-506.awsdns-63.com172800—
NSradiocarbon.comns-528.awsdns-02.net172800—
TXTradiocarbon.com0ed1fe018a0a106f51409044aa8e8fe2a767f92af9300—
TXTradiocarbon.comv=spf1 ip4:3.214.204.181 ip4:44.211.178.112/28 ip4:3.101.216.144/28 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:spfa.cpmails.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all300—
DMARC_dmarc.radiocarbon.comv=DMARC1; p=none;300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectradiocarbon.com
IssuerSectigo Limited
Valid until2027-03-16T23:59 · Remaining when checked: 158 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
serverApache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu)
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
content-security-policyupgrade-insecure-requests;
x-frame-optionsSAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
referrer-policystrict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policycamera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=()

Identified technologies

All in One SEO Pro (AIOSEO) 5.0.3WordPressjQueryBootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerApache 2.4.52

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionRadiocarbon dating lab SGS Beta provides high-quality AMS dating results in 3-14 business days. The laboratory also provides stable isotope analysis.
Canonical URLhttps://www.radiocarbon.com/
LanguageEnglish (default) · Multilingual
Twitter Cardsummary
All bots 1 allowed · 23 disallowed
  • Allow/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php
  • Disallow/wp-admin/
  • Disallow/liability-limitation.htm
  • Disallow/beta-analytic-confidentiality-policy.htm
  • Disallow/tc.pdf
  • Disallow/jp/archaeology-contamination.htm
  • Disallow/deutsch/haftungsbeschrankungen.htm
  • Disallow/espanol/limitacion-responsibilidad.htm
  • Disallow/italiano/laboratorio-limitazione.htm
  • Disallow/portugues/limitacao-responsabilidade.htm
  • Disallow/korean/liability-limitation.htm
  • Disallow/jp/liability-limitation.htm
  • Disallow/zh-hant/liability-limitation.htm
  • Disallow/deutsch/beta-analytic-vertraulichkeits.htm
  • Disallow/espanol/confidencialidad.htm
  • Disallow/portugues/arqueologia-confidencialidade.htm
  • Disallow/korean/beta-analytic-confidentiality-policy.htm
  • Disallow/jp/beta-analytic-confidentiality-policy.htm
  • Disallow/zh-hant/beta-analytic-confidentiality-policy.htm
  • Disallow/miami-lab-teeth-bones/
  • Disallow/miami-lab-online-form/
  • Disallow/miami-lab-marine-reservoir/
  • Disallow/italiano/beta-archeologia.htm
  • Disallow/wp-content/plugins/

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.