Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Raptor?
Raptor is a customer data platform (CDP) that unifies customer data from multiple touchpoints and uses it to personalise marketing across email and websites. Its stated focus is threefold: collecting customer data in one place, building audiences from it, and automating personalised product recommendations.
What it does
According to the site, Raptor brings together data generated when customers browse a website, open an email, or shop in-store, then shapes that data into audiences. On top of those audiences, it offers:
- Website recommendations — personalised homepages, category pages and product pages based on each visitor's browsing and shopping behaviour.
- Email recommendations — product recommendations for individual subscribers, delivered through an existing email platform.
- Email triggers — automated sends tied to behaviour such as an abandoned cart or a price drop.
- Merchandising — boosting chosen products or building curated product feeds for specific audiences across sites and emails.
Who it suits
The clearest fit is a retailer or ecommerce team with a large product catalogue and customer data spread across channels. The site's own examples point that way: XL-BYG reportedly moved from staff manually choosing recommendations across 200,000+ products to automated ones, and Imerco combines purchase data from 165+ physical stores with its online shop to build audiences and behavioural email triggers. If you sell a small, stable range to a mostly anonymous audience, the audience-building and recommendation machinery has less to work with.
A practical first step
Before booking a demo, write down the touchpoints your customer data currently sits in — web analytics, email platform, POS, ecommerce backend — and check which of them Raptor's CDP can actually ingest, since the value depends on that coverage. Then pick one measurable use case, such as website recommendations on category pages, and agree the metric you would judge it by. Raptor publishes a pricing page at Raptor, which is the sensible place to check commercial fit before a sales conversation.
How does Raptor unify customer data from online and offline sources?
Raptor positions itself as a customer data platform (CDP) that pulls together data customers generate at every touchpoint—website browsing, email engagement, and in-store shopping—into one platform, then shapes that unified data into audiences. From there, the same audiences feed personalisation: website recommendations, email recommendations, behavioural email triggers, and merchandising controls.
Raptor
How the pieces fit together
- Collection across channels: The platform's stated scope includes online behaviour (browsing, email opens) and offline activity (in-store shopping), so a customer's history isn't split across separate systems.
- Unification into one home: Rather than leaving data in channel-specific tools, Raptor describes bringing it into a single platform where it becomes the basis for audience building.
- Audience building: Audiences are meant to "reflect who your customers really are" rather than being defined by one channel's view of them.
- Activation: Those audiences then drive recommendations on homepages, category and product pages, personalised product recommendations inside existing email platforms, automated triggers (abandoned cart, price drop), and curated product feeds for merchandising.
A concrete example from the page
Imerco is described as using Raptor's CDP to unify purchase data from 165+ physical stores and its online shop, then building audiences from both. Those audiences are combined with behavioural email triggers, so email becomes a sales channel delivering a personalised message per customer instead of a generic newsletter. XL-BYG is described as replacing manual recommendation selection across 200,000+ products with automated, real-time recommendations, using customer audiences to sharpen targeting.
What to check before assuming it fits
Unifying offline store data usually depends on how that data reaches the platform—POS exports, loyalty systems, or integrations—and how identities are matched across channels. The page states the outcome (one platform, unified audiences) but not the specific connectors or identity-resolution method, so ask about those directly if in-store data is central to your case.
A practical next step: list your actual data sources (e-commerce platform, ESP, POS, loyalty programme) and ask which are supported natively versus via custom work, then test whether a single customer's online and in-store history resolves into one profile before committing.
What types of personalized recommendations can Raptor generate for websites and emails?
Raptor generates four main recommendation types, split by channel and by whether the trigger is the visitor's own behaviour or your merchandising choice.
On websites
- Website recommendations — personalised homepage, category and product page modules built from each visitor's browsing and shopping behaviour.
- Merchandising placements — products you explicitly choose to boost, or fully curated product feeds, shown on-site to selected audiences.
In email
- Email recommendations — per-subscriber product recommendations inserted into sends from your existing email platform, so you keep your current sending tool.
- Email triggers — automated messages fired by behaviour, such as an abandoned cart or a price drop.
How the four differ
| Type | Channel | What decides the products | Typical use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website recommendations | On-site | Visitor behaviour | Homepage, category and product pages |
| Merchandising | On-site and email | Your commercial choice | Campaign pushes, curated feeds |
| Email recommendations | Subscriber behaviour | Regular newsletters and campaigns | |
| Email triggers | A specific behavioural event | Cart recovery, price-drop alerts |
What this means in practice
A mid-size retailer with a large catalogue is the clearest fit. If your team currently picks recommendations by hand across tens of thousands of SKUs, the value is in automating that selection while keeping merchandising control where it matters — for example, letting behavioural recommendations fill most slots but pinning a boosted product during a promotion.
The page cites XL-BYG, which previously relied on product managers to choose recommendations manually across 200,000+ products, and Imerco, which unifies purchase data from 165+ physical stores with its online shop to build audiences for behavioural triggers. Those are the vendors' own customer accounts; the practical read is that both cases depend on getting transaction and browsing data into one place first.
Next step
Decide which of the four you need before evaluating anything else. If your email platform already handles personalisation blocks, start with triggers, since they usually show measurable lift fastest. If your catalogue is too large to merchandise by hand, prioritise website recommendations and check how much manual override the merchandising tools allow. Raptor publishes a pricing page at Raptor if budget is the deciding factor.
How does Raptor automate email triggers based on customer behavior?
Raptor's email triggers watch for a defined customer action and send the matching email automatically, using the customer data already unified in its CDP. The trigger is the behaviour; the platform supplies the audience, timing and personalised content. Raptor's own examples include an abandoned cart and a price drop, both framed as high-intent moments to convert.
What the automation does
- Listens for behaviour. Actions such as abandoning a cart, browsing products, or a price change on a watched item act as the starting signal.
- Resolves who the customer is. Because browsing, email and in-store data sit in one platform, the trigger can reflect the person's real history rather than a single session.
- Builds the message. Product recommendations are generated from that individual's browsing and shopping behaviour, so each recipient sees relevant items.
- Sends through your existing email platform. Raptor states its email recommendations and triggers are built directly into the email tool you already use, so it is not necessarily a replacement for your sending platform.
Where the data comes from
The CDP unifies touchpoints across website, email and physical stores, then shapes them into audiences. Imerco, cited on the page, combines purchase data from 165+ physical stores with its online shop to build audiences, then layers behavioural email triggers on top — the practical point being that a trigger is only as good as the customer record behind it.
What to weigh
Triggered, personalised emails tend to outperform generic newsletters for time-sensitive intent, and Imerco reports a 74% open rate on triggered emails. The trade-off is setup and maintenance: you need to decide which behaviours justify a send, avoid over-messaging the same customer, and keep product feeds and price data accurate, since a price-drop trigger is only useful if the price is current.
A sensible next step is to pick one behaviour with clear intent — abandoned cart is the usual starting point — define the audience and the recommended products, then measure revenue per email before adding more triggers. For teams already running a CDP or considering one, Raptor documents its platform and pricing. If you want a wider comparison of customer data platforms with built-in journey automation, Segment and Bloomreach are established options worth reviewing.
What results have companies achieved using Raptor's customer data platform?
Companies using Raptor's customer data platform report measurable gains in email revenue, conversion rates, and average order value, with several named customers seeing double- or triple-digit improvements after unifying customer data and automating personalisation.
Reported results
Raptor's own results section lists these aggregate figures:
- 102% increase in email revenue
- 52% purchase completion rate
- +273% conversion rate with recommendations
- +37% average order value
- +66% more unique products per order
- −64% lead price on Meta
Two customer stories sit behind those numbers:
| Company | Situation | Reported outcome |
|---|---|---|
| XL-BYG | Product directors manually picked recommendations across 200,000+ products | Real-time recommendations now run automatically, with audiences sharpening range-wide targeting; Helene Birk credits them with a considerable conversion-rate lift |
| Imerco | Purchase data scattered across 165+ physical stores and the online shop | Audiences built from combined store and online data, paired with behavioural email triggers; ~10x increase in click-to-open rate, €1.25 revenue per email, 74% open rate on triggered emails |
How to read these numbers
Treat them as vendor-published customer outcomes, not benchmarks you can expect to copy. The pattern is consistent, though: the gains cluster around email and on-site recommendations, which is exactly where the platform concentrates — website recommendations, email recommendations, behavioural triggers, and merchandising controls.
A practical way to judge fit: if your team currently hand-picks product recommendations or runs one generic newsletter to a mixed list, the XL-BYG and Imerco cases describe your starting point. If you already run sophisticated real-time personalisation, the incremental lift is likely smaller than the headline figures suggest.
The first concrete step is to check whether your data actually supports this. Raptor's premise is unifying web, email, and in-store signals into one customer view; Imerco's results depended on merging 165+ stores with online purchase history. If your store data lives in a separate system you cannot feed into a CDP, that is the constraint to solve before expecting comparable email or recommendation performance. You can review plans at Raptor and compare them against the data sources you can realistically connect.
How much does Raptor cost and what pricing plans are available?
Raptor does not publish its prices or plan tiers on the page supplied here. The site links to a pricing page at Raptor, but the evidence available for this answer does not include any figures, tiers, seat counts, usage limits, or contract terms. So the honest answer to "how much does it cost?" is: that depends on a quote from Raptor, not on a public rate card.
What you can infer about the commercial model
Raptor positions itself as an "agentic customer data platform" that unifies customer data, builds audiences, and automates personalised recommendations across email and websites. Products in this category are typically sold as annual or multi-year subscriptions, with the price driven by factors such as:
- Data volume — how many customer profiles you store and how many events you process per month.
- Traffic and send volume — website visitors receiving recommendations, and email subscribers receiving personalised content.
- Number of channels and use cases — website recommendations, email recommendations, email triggers, and merchandising are presented as separate capabilities, so a narrower start is usually cheaper than a full rollout.
- Integration and services — connecting a CDP to an existing email platform, ecommerce stack, or in-store systems, plus onboarding and support.
Treat those as general patterns for CDP and personalisation vendors, not as confirmed Raptor terms.
How to get an actual number
The practical next step is to request the personalised demo the site offers and ask for a written quote covering your specific volumes. Come prepared with:
- Your number of customer profiles and monthly website sessions.
- Your email list size and monthly send volume.
- Which modules you need first — for example, email triggers alone versus triggers plus website recommendations.
- Your existing stack, so you can ask what integration work is included.
- Contract length, renewal terms, and what happens if your data volume grows mid-term.
A useful decision criterion
Compare vendors on cost per incremental conversion, not on headline licence fee. Raptor's own customer examples point in that direction: XL-BYG reportedly moved from manually curating recommendations across 200,000+ products to automated ones, and Imerco unified purchase data from 165+ physical stores with its online shop to drive triggered emails. If your catalogue or store footprint is that complex, the value case rests on labour saved and revenue lifted, which can justify a higher subscription than a simpler tool. If you only need basic product blocks in email, a lighter and cheaper option may be enough — ask Raptor directly whether a narrower package exists before assuming you must buy the full platform.
User reviews (0)