Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

ssd-tester.com

Find detailed performance tests and benchmarks for the latest SSDs. Speed tests, reviews, and more.

No paid content found Multilingual
Visit website
Profile views 14 Outbound visits 3 Normal
SSD Speed & Benchmark Tests 2026 Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Technology & Electronics
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2023
Hosting
Datacamp LimitedInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is SSD Tester?

SSD Tester is a benchmark and review site focused on storage performance: M.2 NVMe SSDs, SATA SSDs, portable/external drives, and USB flash drives. It publishes speed tests and scores so you can compare models before buying, and it tracks current shop prices alongside the results. It also covers newer PCIe Gen 5.0 drives as well as Gen 4.0 and Gen 3.0.

What you can do there

  • Compare read/write speeds and a numeric score across many drives in one table.
  • Filter by drive type and interface: M.2 SSD, SATA SSD, external drives, USB flash drives.
  • Check whether a drive is worth its price by viewing speed results next to a listed price.
  • See which model is currently ranked as the top performer.

A practical example

If you are choosing a drive for a laptop or desktop, start with the M.2 SSD test page. Suppose you are deciding between two 1TB PCIe 4.0 drives: one shows roughly 7,200 MB/s read and 6,300 MB/s write, another shows about 7,400 MB/s read and 6,700 MB/s write. The difference in sequential speed is small, so the more useful comparison is the site's score and the price shown next to each drive. For a gaming or general-use PC, a cheaper drive with a close score is usually the better buy; for frequent large-file transfers, the higher write speed matters more.

For older machines, the SATA SSD section is the relevant one: SATA tops out around 600 MB/s theoretical and roughly 560 MB/s in practice, so any SATA drive near that ceiling is already close to the interface limit. For backups or moving files between devices, the external drives and USB flash drive sections help you avoid a slow portable drive.

Who it suits

  • Buyers comparing specific models before purchase.
  • People upgrading a laptop or desktop who need to know whether SATA or NVMe fits their needs.
  • Anyone checking whether a claimed speed holds up in real tests.

Trade-offs to keep in mind

Benchmark scores reflect the site's test setup, and real-world performance depends on your motherboard, interface version, cooling, and workload. Sequential speeds are less relevant for small random reads and writes, which affect everyday responsiveness. Prices change daily, so treat them as a snapshot rather than a fixed figure.

A useful next step: pick two or three drives in your budget and capacity, then compare their scores and write speeds side by side rather than chasing the single highest number. For broader context on a specific brand or model, check the manufacturer's official page, such as Samsung or Western Digital.

Which SSD is the fastest according to the latest benchmark tests?

According to the benchmark tables on SSD Speed & Benchmark Tests 2026, the fastest drive currently listed is the OWC Envoy Ultra 2TB, an external USB-C model, with measured sequential reads of 6,231 MB/s and writes of 5,196 MB/s. Among internal M.2 NVMe drives, the Taimi Phoenix 2TB leads the listed results at 7,466 MB/s read and 6,761 MB/s write.

Fastest drives by category (as listed)

Category Fastest listed model Read / Write
M.2 NVMe Taimi Phoenix 2TB 7,466 / 6,761 MB/s
External USB-C OWC Envoy Ultra 2TB 6,231 / 5,196 MB/s
SATA 6 Gb/s DIGIERA CAS100 512GB 550 / 447 MB/s

The site also names the Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 1TB as its current overall winner, even though its listed read/write figures (7,299 / 6,364 MB/s) are slightly below the Taimi Phoenix 2TB. That gap is a useful reminder that a single sequential number doesn't settle which drive is "fastest" in practice.

How to use this

Speed only matters relative to your workload and interface:

  • Large file transfers or video editing benefit most from high sequential read/write, where the Taimi Phoenix and WD_BLACK SN8100 sit at the top.
  • Everyday use, games and OS boot depend more on random 4K performance and latency, which these headline figures don't show.
  • Laptops and external use are limited by the connection: an external drive capped at USB 3.2 Gen 2 (~1,000 MB/s) won't reach its rated speed, so choose based on the port you actually have.
  • Older or budget systems with SATA or PCIe 3.0 slots can't use Gen 4/5 bandwidth, so paying for the fastest NVMe drive is wasted.

As a next step, look up the specific model you're considering on SSD Speed & Benchmark Tests 2026 and compare its random-read and sustained-write results, not just the peak sequential numbers, against your actual use case.

How do PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSDs compare to PCIe 4.0 and 3.0 in real-world speed tests?

PCIe 5.0 NVMe drives post the highest sequential numbers, but the gap narrows sharply as you move to everyday tasks. On SSD Speed & Benchmark Tests 2026, the M.2 test section covers PCIe 5.0, 4.0 and 3.0 side by side, and its headline tables show Gen5-class drives reaching roughly 7,200–7,500 MB/s read and 6,200–6,800 MB/s write, while SATA drives listed on the same site top out near 550 MB/s read and 475 MB/s write — a useful reminder that the biggest jump is still SATA to NVMe, not Gen4 to Gen5.

What the tiers mean in practice

  • PCIe 3.0 x4: Around 3,500 MB/s ceiling for sequential reads. Fine for gaming, office work and most general use.
  • PCIe 4.0 x4: Roughly double Gen3 sequential throughput. The current sweet spot for price-to-performance in large-file work.
  • PCIe 5.0 x4: The fastest sequential figures, but the advantage shows up mainly in sustained large transfers, not in small random operations.

Where the difference actually appears

Sequential speed governs copying big video files, moving game installs, and loading large project assets. Random read/write at low queue depths governs boot time, app launches and general snappiness — and there the tiers cluster much more closely. A Gen5 drive rarely feels faster than a good Gen4 drive when opening a browser or a game level.

Heat and power are the trade-off. Gen5 drives typically run hotter and may need a heatsink or good airflow; a Gen4 drive is often the quieter, cooler choice in a laptop or a small case.

A practical decision path

  1. If your board only supports Gen3, buy the best Gen3 or Gen4 drive you can afford — a Gen5 drive will just run at Gen3 speed.
  2. If you routinely move 50 GB+ files, a Gen4 drive is usually the better value; step to Gen5 only if the workload is genuinely sequential-heavy.
  3. If you mostly game, browse and write documents, put the money into capacity instead of generation.

A concrete example: someone editing 4K footage on an external USB-C SSD will see far more benefit from a fast portable drive than from upgrading an internal Gen4 to Gen5. The external drive test section on SSD Speed & Benchmark Tests 2026 shows portable drives ranging from roughly 900 MB/s to over 6,000 MB/s, so the enclosure and interface often matter more than the internal generation.

What should I consider when choosing between an M.2 NVMe SSD and a SATA SSD for my system?

Choose M.2 NVMe when your motherboard has a free M.2 slot and you want the fastest everyday performance; choose SATA when you need a cheap, universally compatible drive for an older machine, a laptop with only a 2.5-inch bay, or bulk storage where speed matters less.

The practical differences

Consideration M.2 NVMe SATA SSD
Interface PCIe 3.0/4.0/5.0 via M.2 slot SATA 6 Gb/s
Realistic ceiling Thousands of MB/s (PCIe 5.0 drives go far higher) ~560 MB/s in practice
Compatibility Needs an M.2 slot of the right key and PCIe generation Works in almost any desktop or laptop from the last 15 years
Cabling None; mounts on the board Data and power cables, plus a bay
Typical role Boot drive, game library, video editing scratch disk Secondary storage, older systems, budget builds
Heat Higher-end drives can throttle without a heatsink Rarely a concern

The site's own test tables show the gap clearly: its M.2 NVMe listings report sequential reads in the 3,600–7,500 MB/s range, while its SATA section tops out around 550 MB/s. Its external-drive tests sit in between, which matters if you are comparing a portable SSD against an internal upgrade.

What to check before buying

  1. Does your board actually have an M.2 slot, and which PCIe generation? A Gen 4 or Gen 5 drive in a Gen 3 slot still works but runs at Gen 3 speed.
  2. Slot length and key. Most are 2280 M-key, but laptops sometimes use 2242 or 2230.
  3. Lane sharing. On some boards, populating the M.2 slot disables a SATA port or drops the GPU to x8. Check the manual.
  4. Sustained performance, not just peak. Large file copies and game installs depend on write speed after the cache fills; benchmark tables usually show both.
  5. DRAM and controller quality. Two drives with identical rated speeds can behave very differently under load.

A concrete scenario

If you are building a mid-range gaming PC, the usual split is a 1–2 TB NVMe drive for Windows and frequently played games, plus a SATA SSD or hard drive for media and archives. If you are reviving a 2013 laptop, SATA is often the only option, and even a modest SATA SSD will feel transformative compared with a mechanical drive.

For a starting point, browse the M.2 and SATA comparison tables at SSD Speed & Benchmark Tests 2026 and sort by the workload closest to yours rather than by the highest sequential number.

Are external USB-C SSDs fast enough for video editing or large file transfers?

Yes—for most video editing and large-file work, a good USB-C external SSD is fast enough, but the answer depends on which USB generation the drive and your port support. A USB 3.2 Gen 2 drive typically moves large files at roughly 1,000 MB/s, while USB4 drives can reach several thousand MB/s. At 1,000 MB/s, copying a 50 GB project takes under a minute; at USB4 speeds, it is well under 20 seconds.

SSD Speed & Benchmark Tests 2026 tests external drives specifically, and its results show the spread clearly: the Verbatim Store 'n' Go Mini Diamond 512GB measured 1,081 MB/s read and 1,018 MB/s write, while the OWC Envoy Ultra 2TB measured 6,231 MB/s read and 5,196 MB/s write. The fanxiang PS2200 2TB and DIGIERA LPS2000M 1TB landed near 2,000 MB/s read, and the LinkMore NR P100 512GB around 914 MB/s. That is a five- to six-fold difference between the slowest and fastest drives in the same test category, so "USB-C SSD" alone tells you very little.

What matters for your workload

  • Sustained write speed, not peak. Editing software writes continuously during capture and export. A drive that starts fast and then throttles will stall long exports.
  • Port generation on both ends. A USB4 drive in a USB 3.2 Gen 2 port runs at the slower port's ceiling. Check your laptop or desktop spec before paying for speed you cannot use.
  • Capacity headroom. Video projects consume space quickly; a drive that is nearly full often writes more slowly.
  • Direct editing vs. transfer. Editing footage directly from the drive demands higher, steadier throughput than simply copying files to internal storage first.

A practical decision rule

If you mostly transfer finished files and edit from internal storage, a ~1,000 MB/s USB-C SSD is a sensible, cheaper choice. If you edit multicam or high-bitrate footage directly from the external drive, aim for a USB4-class model like the ones near the top of the test results, and confirm your machine has a matching port.

As a next step, compare the read and write figures for the specific capacities you are considering rather than the headline number for the product line, since performance often differs between sizes.

How do budget SSD brands like fanxiang and Taimi perform compared to established brands like Samsung and Western Digital?

On the evidence of this site's benchmark tables, the budget brands often post headline sequential read/write figures that look competitive with, or even higher than, the big names — but the model-to-model spread is far wider, so the brand name tells you much less than the specific drive does.

What the listed results show

Drive (as listed) Interface Capacity Read / Write (MB/s) Price shown
fanxiang S880E M.2 NVMe 1 TB 7229 / 6208 $127
KingBank KP260 Plus M.2 NVMe 1 TB 7423 / 6715 n/a
Taimi Vulcan M.2 NVMe 1 TB 3642 / 2967 $73
Taimi Phoenix M.2 NVMe 2 TB 7466 / 6761 $270
WD_BLACK SN850P M.2 NVMe 1 TB 7299 / 6364 $240
Samsung 990 M.2 NVMe 1 TB 7221 / 5651 $230

Two things stand out. First, the fanxiang S880E and the Taimi Phoenix sit in the same sequential range as the WD_BLACK SN850P and Samsung 990 — the site's "current winner" is a WD_BLACK SN8100, so the fastest drive in its own ranking is still a Western Digital. Second, the budget group is not uniform: the Taimi Vulcan lands around half the speed of the Taimi Phoenix for roughly a third of the price. That is a bigger gap than the gap between the best budget drive and the best mainstream one.

Where the money actually goes

The tables on SSD Speed & Benchmark Tests 2026 report sequential throughput and a composite score, not sustained-write behaviour, cache exhaustion, controller thermals or firmware consistency. Sequential numbers are the easiest thing for any brand to optimise and the least predictive of what you feel day to day. Established brands generally earn their premium on consistency across capacity points, predictable firmware updates, warranty handling and long-term support — not on peak MB/s. Budget brands earn their discount by varying controllers and NAND between production runs, which is why two drives with the same name can measure differently months apart.

A practical way to choose

  • If you are filling a secondary slot for game libraries, media scratch space or a NAS cache, and you can replace the drive cheaply, a budget NVMe with strong listed sequential numbers is a reasonable buy.
  • If the drive holds your only copy of active work, your OS, or anything you cannot re-download, pay for the established brand — you are buying predictability and support, not speed.
  • Ignore brand-level generalisations and compare the exact model, capacity and firmware revision. Within both camps, a cheap model from a good brand can underperform an expensive model from a budget one.
  • Treat the price column as the real differentiator. When a budget drive is only slightly cheaper than a Samsung or WD_BLACK at the same capacity, the case for it largely disappears.
  • Before buying, check whether the specific capacity you want has been tested. Smaller capacities of the same model are frequently much slower than the 1 TB and 2 TB versions shown in these tables.

Next step: pick two or three candidate models at your target capacity, open their individual test pages on the site, and compare the score column and the write figures rather than the read figures — writes are where budget drives diverge first.

Related questions

More questions →
How to Find the Fastest or Best SSD on SSD Tester

SSD Tester (ssd-tester.com) publishes benchmark results for M.2 NVMe, SATA, portable, and USB flash drives, and it names a "Current winner" for overall performance — as of the site's 2026 data, the Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 1TB. To find the fastest or best SSD for your situation, start with that winner if you want the top performer, then use the category tables (M.2, SATA, external, USB) to compare read/write speeds, capacity, price, and score within the interface type you actually need.

What SSD Tester provides

The site is a benchmark and review database rather than a shop. Its stated purpose is to help you make an informed purchase decision using detailed performance, speed, and benchmark reviews. Key features visible on the homepage:

  • Current winner — a highlighted top pick (Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 1TB, listed at 1409 in the score column).
  • Category test sections — M.2 SSD Test, SATA SSD Test, External Drives Test, and USB Flash Drive Test.
  • Comparison tables — each row lists product name, capacity, read speed, write speed, price, and score.
  • Regular updates — new models are tested regularly, and Gen5 SSDs are now included.
  • Daily updated shop prices — price fields are refreshed daily, though the site does not sell drives itself.

Step-by-step: finding the fastest or best SSD

  1. Decide which category matches your hardware. M.2 covers PCIe 5.0, 4.0, and 3.0 NVMe drives; SATA covers 6 Gb/s drives; External covers USB-C portable drives; USB covers USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 flash drives. A drive from the wrong category won't fit or won't reach its rated speed in your system.
  2. Check the Current winner first if raw speed is your priority. It represents the site's top-scoring drive across its testing.
  3. Open the relevant category table and sort your attention by the score column, then cross-check read/write speeds. Higher score generally means better overall measured performance in that category.
  4. Filter by capacity and price. The tables show capacity in GB and a price figure, so you can weigh speed against cost per drive.
  5. Confirm the interface ceiling. A SATA SSD tops out around 600 MB/s theoretical (~560 MB/s practical), so don't expect M.2-level speeds there. USB 4.0 external drives can theoretically reach 40 Gbit/s (~3,700 MB/s practical).

How to read the comparison tables

Each category table uses the same columns, which makes cross-model comparison straightforward:

Column What it tells you
Product name The exact model tested
Capacity Drive size in GB
Read / Write Measured sequential speeds in MB/s
Price Daily-updated shop price indicator
Score The site's aggregate benchmark score

Example rows from the M.2 table show how to compare: the fanxiang S880E 1TB lists 7229 MB/s read and 6208 MB/s write with a score of 12755, while the Taimi Phoenix 2TB shows 7466 MB/s read and 6761 MB/s write with a score of 15048 — higher capacity and higher score, but also a higher price figure.

Category-specific notes

M.2 SSD Test

Covers PCIe 5.0 (Gen5), PCIe 4.0, and PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe drives. This is where the fastest consumer drives appear, and where the Current winner sits.

SATA SSD Test

SATA 6 Gb/s drives, theoretical maximum 600 MB/s (practically ~560 MB/s). Useful if your board or laptop only has SATA ports.

External Drives Test

USB-C portable drives. USB 4.0 allows a theoretical 40 Gbit/s (~3,700 MB/s practical). Note that real-world results depend heavily on the host port and cable.

USB Flash Drive Test

USB 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2 drives. USB 2.0 drives are excluded because the site considers them outdated.

Choosing between drives

  • If you want the single fastest drive: go with the Current winner, then verify it fits your slot type (M.2 NVMe) and that your motherboard supports its PCIe generation.
  • If you're limited to SATA: pick the highest score in the SATA table; expect roughly 550 MB/s read at best.
  • If you need portability: compare External Drives results, but match the drive to your port — a USB 4.0 drive won't hit its ceiling on an older USB port.
  • If budget matters more than peak speed: use the price column alongside score to find the best score per price within your category, rather than defaulting to the top of the list.

Practical caveats

  • Benchmark scores reflect the site's test setup; your real-world speed depends on your CPU, motherboard, port, cable, and how full the drive is.
  • The price column is a daily-updated shop price indicator, not a checkout price — confirm the actual price at the retailer.
  • The site tests and reviews drives; it does not appear to sell them, so treat it as a research tool before buying elsewhere.
What types of SSDs and drives does SSD Tester benchmark?

SSD Tester (ssd-tester.com) benchmarks four categories of storage devices: M.2 NVMe SSDs (PCIe 5.0, 4.0, and 3.0 x4), SATA SSDs (SATA 6 Gb/s), external USB-C drives, and USB flash drives (USB 3.0/3.1/3.2 only — USB 2.0 drives are excluded as outdated). Each category has its own test section with read/write speeds, capacity, price, and a composite score, so you can compare devices within the same interface class rather than across incomparable ones.

M.2 NVMe SSDs (PCIe 5.0 / 4.0 / 3.0 x4)

This is the fastest category on the site, covering the newer PCIe 5.0 fifth-generation NVMe drives as well as PCIe 4.0 and the slower PCIe 3.0 x4 models. Listed results include sequential read/write speeds, capacity, current price, and score.

Examples from the current listing:

Product Capacity Read Write Price Score
fanxiang S880E 1024 GB 7229 MB/s 6208 MB/s 170 $ 12755
KingBank KP260 Plus 1024 GB 7423 MB/s 6715 MB/s n/a 13510
Taimi Vulcan 1024 GB 3642 MB/s 2967 MB/s 146 $ 7364
Taimi Phoenix 2048 GB 7466 MB/s 6761 MB/s 270 $ 15048
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850P 1024 GB 7299 MB/s 6364 MB/s 240 $ 15035
Samsung 990 1024 GB 7221 MB/s 5651 MB/s 230 $ 12560
Apacer AS2280Q4U 1024 GB 7243 MB/s 6072 MB/s 263 $ 12487

The site's current overall winner is the Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 1TB, listed with a score of 1409. New models are tested regularly, and the site states that Gen5 SSDs are now included in testing.

SATA SSDs (SATA 6 Gb/s)

SATA drives are tested in a separate section. The interface's theoretical maximum is 600 MB/s, with a practical ceiling of roughly 560 MB/s — so any SATA SSD you see here will cluster near that limit regardless of brand.

Product Capacity Read Write Price Score
DIGIERA CAS100 512 GB 550 MB/s 447 MB/s 62 $ 1232
Taimi Aurora 1024 GB 535 MB/s 450 MB/s 120 $ 1231
TeamGroup QX 1024 GB 527 MB/s 445 MB/s 134 $ 1224
Acer SA100 1920 GB 549 MB/s 475 MB/s n/a 1368
Western Digital WD Red SA500 2048 GB 547 MB/s 460 MB/s n/a 1237

Because the interface caps performance, differences between SATA models show up more in capacity, price, and score than in raw throughput.

External drives (USB-C)

Portable drives connected over USB-C are tested here. With USB 4.0, the theoretical maximum is 40 Gbit/s, practically around 3,700 MB/s — though most listed drives fall well below that.

Product Capacity Read Write Price Score
fanxiang PS2200 2048 GB 2045 MB/s 1886 MB/s n/a 1523
DIGIERA LPS2000M 1024 GB 2073 MB/s 1881 MB/s 160 $ 1747
Verbatim Store 'n' Go Mini Diamond 512 GB 1081 MB/s 1018 MB/s 82 $ 1426
OWC Envoy Ultra 2048 GB 6231 MB/s 5196 MB/s 800 $ 6170
LinkMore NR P100 512 GB 914 MB/s 855 MB/s 120 $ 1653

The spread here is wide — from roughly 900 MB/s to over 6,000 MB/s — so the USB generation and enclosure matter as much as the drive itself.

USB flash drives (USB 3.0 / 3.1 / 3.2)

USB flash drives get their own section covering USB 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2 drives. USB 2.0 drives are deliberately not tested because the site considers them no longer up to date. If you're shopping for a thumb drive, this is the section to check — but note that flash drives generally sit far below both NVMe and external SSD performance.

How to use these categories

  • Match the category to your interface. A SATA SSD will never approach an M.2 NVMe drive, so compare within a section, not across sections.
  • Check the interface generation. For M.2, PCIe 5.0 vs 4.0 vs 3.0 x4 changes the ceiling; for external drives, USB 4.0 vs earlier USB matters.
  • Use the score for quick ranking, then verify with read/write and price. The score is a composite; the raw speeds and price tell you whether the trade-off fits your use case.
  • Prices are listed as daily-updated shop prices, and some entries show "n/a" where no price is available — treat those as unconfirmed rather than free.
What Information Is Shown in SSD Tester's Benchmark Results?

SSD Tester (ssd-tester.com) publishes benchmark tables for four drive categories, and each row gives you the same core fields: product name, image, capacity, sequential read speed, sequential write speed, price in USD, and a numeric score. You can use these fields to compare drives within a category, but the score is only meaningful against other drives tested on the same site — it is not a cross-site standard.

The four benchmark categories

The site splits its testing by interface and form factor, and each category has its own practical speed ceiling that explains why the numbers look so different between tables.

Category Interface tested Practical speed ceiling noted on site
M.2 SSD Test PCIe 5.0, 4.0, and 3.0 x4 NVMe Not stated as a single figure; Gen5 drives are included
SATA SSD Test SATA 6 Gb/s ~560 MB/s (theoretical 600 MB/s)
External Drives Test USB-C, including USB 4.0 ~3,700 MB/s (theoretical 40 Gbit/s)
USB Flash Drive Test USB 3.0, 3.1, 3.2 USB 2.0 drives are excluded as outdated

Because the ceilings differ, a 550 MB/s SATA result and a 7,400 MB/s M.2 result are both "fast" within their own table. Compare within a category, not across categories.

What each field tells you

Product name, image, capacity

The name identifies the exact model, and capacity is listed both in marketing terms and in actual GB — for example, "1TB" alongside "1024 GB," or "1.87TB" alongside "1920 GB." Watch this column: the same model line often appears at several capacities with different scores, so a score belongs to a specific capacity, not to the product family.

Read and write speed (MB/s)

These are sequential read and write figures in MB/s. They are the headline numbers most buyers scan first, and they map directly onto the interface ceiling for that category. A SATA drive showing 550 MB/s read is at the practical limit; an M.2 drive showing 7,229 MB/s read is a Gen4-class result.

Price (USD) and score

Price is shown in US dollars with a "$" marker. Some rows show "n/a" instead of a price — that means no price was recorded for that entry, not that the drive is free. The score is a single number that rises with performance; in the M.2 table, for instance, entries range from 7,364 up to 15,048, while SATA entries sit in the 1,224–1,368 range. Treat the score as a within-category ranking aid.

"Show all" links

Each category table shows a handful of rows followed by a link to the full list — "Show all M.2 SSD tests," "Show all SATA SSD tests," "Show all portable SSD/HDD tests." Use these when the drive you are considering is not in the preview rows.

How to read a results table in practice

  1. Pick the category that matches the drive you are buying (M.2, SATA, external, or USB flash).
  2. Scan read and write speeds first, but check them against the category ceiling so you know whether a number is near the limit or mid-range.
  3. Check the capacity column — confirm the score and price you are looking at belong to the capacity you want.
  4. Compare scores only among rows in the same table.
  5. Follow the "Show all" link if your candidate model is missing from the preview.

Worked example

Suppose you are choosing between two 1TB M.2 drives. One row shows 7,229 MB/s read, 6,208 MB/s write, a price of 170 $, and a score of 12,755. Another shows 7,423 MB/s read, 6,715 MB/s write, no listed price, and a score of 13,510. The second is faster and scores higher, but with price marked "n/a" you cannot judge value from this table alone — you would need the price from another source before deciding.

Common points of confusion

  • "n/a" price is not zero. It means the field was not populated for that row.
  • Score is site-specific. It reflects SSD Tester's own testing and weighting, so do not compare it to scores from other review sites.
  • Capacity changes the result. A 2TB entry and a 1TB entry from the same product line can carry different speeds and scores.
  • USB 2.0 drives are not covered. If your drive is USB 2.0, it will not appear in the flash drive table.

The site also notes that new models are tested regularly and that shop prices are updated daily, so a table you read today may gain rows or change prices later.

How to Navigate SSD Tester to Find a Specific SSD Test

To find a specific SSD test on ssd-tester.com, start from the top navigation bar and pick the drive category that matches your hardware: M.2 SSDs, SATA SSDs, Portable SSDs, USB flash drives, or Enclosures. Each category page lists tested models with capacity, sequential read/write speeds, price, and a score, so you can scan the table for the exact model you're considering. If you don't have a model in mind yet, use the Top SSDs or Compare pages first to narrow down candidates, then jump back into the category list for the full test entry.

Step 1: Choose the right category from the top navigation

The site organizes all tests by drive type, not by brand or capacity. Matching your use case to the category is the fastest way to avoid scrolling through irrelevant results.

Category What it covers Typical interface
M.2 SSD Test PCIe 5.0, 4.0, and 3.0 x4 NVMe drives M.2 NVMe
SATA SSD Test SATA 6 Gb/s drives (theoretical max 600 MB/s, practical ~560 MB/s) 2.5" SATA
External Drives Test USB-C portable drives, including USB 4.0 (theoretical max 40 Gbit/s, practical ~3,700 MB/s) USB-C
USB Flash Drive Test USB 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2 drives (USB 2.0 drives are not tested) USB-A/C
Enclosures Drive enclosure tests Varies

If you already know your drive is an M.2 NVMe model, go straight to M.2 SSDs. If it's a 2.5-inch drive, use SATA SSDs. For a portable drive you plug in via USB-C, use Portable SSDs.

Step 2: Scan the category table for your model

Each category page presents a table with the same columns, so you can compare at a glance:

  • Product name — the exact model string used in the test
  • Capacity — listed in both GB and the marketing capacity (e.g., 1024 GB / 1TB)
  • Read / Write — sequential speeds in MB/s
  • Price — current shop price where available (some entries show "n/a")
  • Score — the site's aggregate benchmark score

For example, on the M.2 page you'll see entries like the Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850P 1TB (7299 MB/s read, 6364 MB/s write, score 15035) alongside the Samsung 990 1TB (7221 MB/s read, 5651 MB/s write, score 12560). On the SATA page, drives cluster around the interface limit — the Acer SA100 1.87TB shows 549 MB/s read and 475 MB/s write.

If your model isn't in the short list shown on the landing page, click Show all M.2 SSD tests (or the equivalent link for that category) to see the full set.

Step 3: Use Top SSDs and Compare when you don't have a model yet

If you're starting from "which SSD should I buy" rather than "I want to check this specific drive," the Top SSDs page gives you the current winner and ranked picks. The homepage highlights the current winner — at the time of the site's data, the Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 1TB with a score of 1409.

The Compare page lets you put multiple drives side by side, which is useful when two models are close in price but differ in write speed or score.

Step 4: Switch language if needed

The site supports English, German, French, Italian, Spanish, Polish, Swedish, and Dutch. The language selector sits in the top area of the page. Switching language changes the interface text; the benchmark numbers and model names stay the same.

What you'll see on a test entry

Each model's test entry gives you the data needed to make a purchase decision:

  • Sequential read and write speeds (MB/s)
  • Capacity as tested
  • Current price where the site has it
  • A composite score for ranking

The site notes that new models are tested regularly and that prices are updated daily, so a model's price and score can change between visits. If a price shows "n/a," the site doesn't have a current listing for that drive — check the retailer directly rather than assuming it's unavailable.

Common navigation issues

  • Model not appearing in the short list — use the "Show all" link at the bottom of the category table.
  • Looking for a USB 2.0 drive — these are not tested, so they won't appear in the USB flash drive section.
  • Confusing M.2 and SATA — check your drive's interface first; an M.2 SATA drive belongs in the SATA category by interface, not the M.2 category by form factor.
  • Price shows n/a — the site couldn't pull a current shop price; the benchmark data is still valid.
What is SSD Tester (ssd-tester.com)?

SSD Tester is a benchmark and review site that publishes measured read/write speeds and scores for M.2 NVMe SSDs, SATA SSDs, portable drives, and USB flash drives. It is useful if you are comparing specific drive models before buying and want independent speed numbers rather than manufacturer claims. The site also tracks daily shop prices and names a "current winner" among tested drives.

What the site covers

The homepage organizes tests into four categories, each with its own table of results:

Category What is tested Notes from the site
M.2 SSD Test PCIe 5.0, 4.0, and 3.0 x4 NVMe drives Includes Gen 5.0 models
SATA SSD Test SATA 6 Gb/s drives Theoretical max 600 MB/s, practically ~560 MB/s
External Drives Test USB-C portable drives USB 4.0 theoretical max 40 Gbit/s, practically ~3,700 MB/s
USB Flash Drive Test USB 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2 drives USB 2.0 drives are not tested

Each listing shows product name, capacity, measured read speed, measured write speed, price, and a score. For example, the M.2 table lists the Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850P 1TB at 7,299 MB/s read and 6,364 MB/s write with a score of 15,035, while the SATA table lists the TeamGroup QX 1TB at 527 MB/s read and 445 MB/s write with a score of 1,224.

What you can get from it

  • Speed comparisons across models. You can see how drives in the same category perform against each other, which is the main reason to visit rather than reading a single review.
  • A stated best/fastest pick. The site highlights a current winner — at the time of the source material, the Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 1TB — and frames its purpose as answering "which is the best SSD and which is the fastest SSD."
  • Price context. Prices are described as daily updated shop prices, so listings pair performance with a rough cost figure.
  • Regular new-model coverage. The site states that new models are tested regularly, and Gen5 SSDs are now included.

How to use it for a purchase decision

  1. Pick the category matching your hardware — M.2 for NVMe slots, SATA for older laptops/desktops, External for portable use, USB Flash Drive for thumb drives.
  2. Sort or scan by read/write speed and score within that category.
  3. Check the capacity column, since the same model line can perform differently at different capacities.
  4. Compare the listed price against your local retailer, since shop prices vary by region and the site's figures are a snapshot.

Limits to keep in mind

  • The site publishes benchmark results and scores; it does not document its full test methodology on the pages shown, so treat scores as comparative within the site rather than absolute.
  • USB 2.0 drives are explicitly excluded, so you will not find results for older or budget thumb drives.
  • Price and score fields are sometimes marked "n/a," meaning not every listing is complete.
  • The site is available in multiple languages (English, German, French, Italian, Spanish, Polish, Swedish, Dutch).

Website Overview

The available information shows a mix of normal operation and configuration gaps. Depending on how the website is used, these gaps may affect secure access or the consistency of its public presentation.

Domain and Registration

Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain has about 3 years of registration history; its current configuration provides more context than age alone. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

The lowest TTL is 35 seconds, supporting rapid record changes at the cost of more frequent lookups. Nameservers are provided by bunny.net, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Hostinger Email email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

X-Powered-By exposes backend information: PHP/8.5.10. The response lacks these common security headers: HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header contains the custom value BunnyCDN-ASB1-1503. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Bootstrap, Google Analytics, PHP without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

No Open Graph metadata was detected, so social previews may depend on platform inference. The page declares 12 language or regional alternatives using hreflang. The title has 32 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 99 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.

Hosting and Email

DNSbunny.net
HostingDatacamp Limited
EmailHostinger Email
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagAshburn, Virginia, United States Inferred 152.233.50.2

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarHOSTINGER operations, UAB
Registered2023-01-11
Expires2027-01-11
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserverscoco.bunny.net、kiki.bunny.net
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Assd-tester.com152.233.50.235—
AAAAssd-tester.com2400:52e0:1a04::925:135—
MXssd-tester.commx1.hostinger.com3005
MXssd-tester.commx2.hostinger.com30010
NSssd-tester.comcoco.bunny.net172800—
NSssd-tester.comkiki.bunny.net172800—
TXTssd-tester.comgoogle-site-verification=aL9Fw9e4IDvB0pncNrWHMiNEyP8MTUSB79LkqZdhDaA300—
TXTssd-tester.comv=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all900—
DMARC_dmarc.ssd-tester.comv=DMARC1; p=none900—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectssd-tester.com
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2027-01-01T00:04 · Remaining when checked: 89 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
content-languageen-US
cache-controlno-cache
serverBunnyCDN-ASB1-1503
content-security-policyupgrade-insecure-requests

Identified technologies

BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsPHP

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionFind detailed performance tests and benchmarks for the latest SSDs. Speed tests, reviews, and more.
Canonical URLhttps://ssd-tester.com/
LanguageEnglish (default) · Multilingual
Twitter CardNot detected

Unknown

All bots 0 allowed · 0 disallowed

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.