whois.ipip.net No paid content found

Brazil ranks second in the IPIP.NET country-level table for both allocated ASNs (9,157) and announced ASNs (8,783), behind only the United States. The same row shows 77,606,656 IPv4 addresses and 31,373,490,721,038 IPv6 /64 blocks. If you are reading that row to judge how large, how concentrated, or how IPv6-ready Brazil's internet is, the four numbers answer different questions and should not be mixed.

What the Brazil row actually contains

The IPIP.NET table "Autonomous Systems and IP Address Allocations by Country / Region" lists, for each country or region:

• Allocated ASNs — autonomous system numbers assigned to that country/region in the registry records.
• Announced ASNs — ASNs actually visible in BGP announcements.
• ASN IPv4 Number — the count of IPv4 addresses associated with those ASNs.
• ASN IPv6 Number (/64) — the count of IPv6 address space expressed in /64 units.

For Brazil the values are:

Allocated vs. announced ASNs: what the gap means

Brazil's gap is 374 ASNs (9,157 − 8,783), or about 4.1% of allocated numbers. That is small. It means the overwhelming majority of ASNs assigned to Brazil are actually in use and visible in routing — not dormant allocations sitting in a registry.

For comparison, using the same table:

A large gap usually points to one of a few things: historical allocations that were never deployed, numbers held by organizations that stopped announcing, or registry assignments that never reached the routing table. Brazil's low gap suggests its ASN space is comparatively "live." India's high gap suggests a large share of allocated ASNs are not currently announced.

This is a routing-activity signal, not a measure of network quality or market maturity.

IPv4 addresses relative to ASN count

Brazil has 77,606,656 IPv4 addresses spread across roughly 8,783 announced ASNs — about 8,836 IPv4 addresses per announced ASN on average. That average is a rough density indicator, not a per-network figure; a handful of large carriers hold most of the space.

Two cautions when reading this number:

• The table reports addresses associated with ASNs attributed to Brazil, which is not the same as addresses geographically located in Brazil. A Brazilian-registered ASN can announce address space used elsewhere, and foreign ASNs can announce space used inside Brazil.
• IPv4 exhaustion means the number reflects historical allocation, not current demand. A country's IPv4 count says more about when it received space than about how much it needs now.

Why the IPv6 number looks enormous

The IPv6 figure — 31,373,490,721,038 — is counted in /64 blocks, not addresses. A single /64 contains 2^64 addresses, so the unit is deliberately coarse. The number is large because IPv6 space is allocated in vastly bigger chunks than IPv4.

Do not compare the IPv4 count (77,606,656) directly against the IPv6 count (31,373,490,721,038) and conclude Brazil has hundreds of thousands of times more IPv6 than IPv4. The units differ. The IPv6 column tells you how much /64-sized space is associated with Brazilian ASNs; the IPv4 column tells you how many individual IPv4 addresses. They are not the same kind of quantity.

What the IPv6 column is useful for is relative comparison between countries in the same table, since every row uses the same /64 unit.

Comparing Brazil with the United States and China

Using the same four columns:

Reading across:

• The United States leads on every column, with roughly 3.5× Brazil's allocated ASNs and about 19× its IPv4 addresses.
• Brazil has more allocated and announced ASNs than China, but far fewer IPv4 addresses (77.6M vs. 356.4M) and far less IPv6 /64 space.
• China has fewer ASNs but much larger address blocks per ASN, consistent with a more concentrated carrier structure.

So ASN count and address count measure different things: ASN count reflects how many distinct routing entities exist, while address count reflects how much space is held. A country can rank high on one and lower on the other, and Brazil is an example of that.

Common misreadings to avoid

• Treating ASN count as network size. Many small ASNs can outnumber a few large ones while holding less address space.
• Treating the IPv4 count as population-adjusted. The table gives absolute counts only; without population data you cannot derive per-capita figures from it.
• Comparing IPv4 and IPv6 columns directly. Different units, as explained above.
• Assuming country attribution equals geography. ASN-to-country mapping is registry-based and does not guarantee where traffic or infrastructure physically sits.
• Reading the gap as a quality score. A small allocated-to-announced gap shows routing activity, not performance, coverage, or reliability.

How to use the Brazil row in practice

If you need a quick, defensible statement about Brazil's internet from this table, the safe ones are:

• Brazil has the second-highest allocated and announced ASN counts in the table, after the United States.
• Its allocated-to-announced gap is small relative to peers like the United States and India, indicating most allocated ASNs are announced.
• Its IPv4 holdings are far smaller than China's despite having more ASNs, and its IPv6 /64 space is likewise smaller than China's.

Anything beyond that — market concentration, per-capita availability, IPv6 adoption rate — requires additional data the table does not provide.

The South China Morning Post (scmp.com) covers China through several distinct desks — China, Economy, Tech, and Opinion — and the most efficient way to follow it is to pick two or three of those sections rather than reading the homepage top to bottom. This works if your goal is staying current on geopolitics, diplomacy, business, or technology without spending an hour a day on it. It assumes you can reach scmp.com and are willing to scan headlines before committing to full articles.

What SCMP actually covers on China

The site describes its China coverage as spanning geopolitics, diplomacy, the economy, technology, and lifestyle. In practice that means the China desk handles mainland politics and society, while Economy and Tech carry the business and industry angles, and Opinion runs columns and commentary. Hong Kong, Asia, the US, and World sections sit alongside these, so China stories also surface outside the China section when the angle is regional or global.

That overlap matters: a story about US–China trade could appear under China, Economy, or World depending on how the editors frame it. If you only watch one section, you will miss related coverage filed elsewhere.

Telling reporting apart from opinion

This is the single most useful habit for reading any news site, including SCMP. News reporting aims to relay what happened and attribute it to sources. Opinion pieces argue a position, and they are usually labeled as such — look for "Opinion," a columnist byline, or a first-person framing. Analysis sits in between: it explains why something happened and often carries more interpretation than a straight news report.

Practical check before you read:

• Headline voice — a claim stated as a conclusion ("X is losing the tech race") usually signals opinion or analysis; a factual frame ("X announced Y") signals reporting.
• Section tag — if it sits in Opinion, treat it as an argument, not a record.
• Byline type — staff correspondents vs. named columnists vs. contributors.

Mixing these up is the most common way readers come away with a distorted picture of a fast-moving story like China–US relations.

Building a scanning routine

You do not need to read everything. A workable routine:

1. Pick your lanes. Choose two or three sections that match your interest — for example China + Economy, or China + Tech.
2. Scan headlines first. Read only the headline and standfirst (the line under it) to decide if a story is worth opening.
3. Check the section and label. Confirm whether you are about to read reporting, analysis, or opinion.
4. Open selectively. Two or three full reads a day beats skimming twenty.
5. Use topic and region filters. SCMP groups content by topic and region, so you can track a specific thread — say, semiconductor policy or Hong Kong politics — instead of re-scanning the whole site.

If you want a lighter load, follow the China section headline feed only and dip into Economy or Tech when a headline signals a development you already track.

Free vs. paywalled content

SCMP operates a subscription model, so some articles sit behind a paywall while others are readable without one. The site does not publish a simple free/paid split you can rely on in advance, so the practical approach is:

• Judge before you click. Paywalled pieces often show a preview or a subscription prompt; if you hit a wall, decide whether the topic is important enough to you to subscribe.
• Do not assume access. A headline being visible does not mean the full article is free.
• Check current terms on the site. Pricing and what is included change, so verify on scmp.com rather than relying on secondhand descriptions.

Common pitfalls

• Treating opinion as news. The biggest one. A column arguing a position is not the same as a report of events.
• Watching one section only. China stories are filed across China, Economy, Tech, World, and Opinion — a single-section habit creates blind spots.
• Reading volume instead of relevance. Following China news efficiently means filtering hard, not reading more.
• Assuming all content is free. Budget for a subscription if you want consistent full access.

The short version

Use the China section as your base, add Economy or Tech depending on your interest, always check whether you are reading reporting or opinion, scan headlines before opening articles, and confirm current access terms on the site itself. That combination lets you follow China coverage on SCMP in a few minutes a day without losing the thread.

The United States leads the IPIP.NET country-level table with 32,219 allocated ASNs, 18,855 announced ASNs, 1,497,299,200 IPv4 addresses, and 975,910,303,763,789 IPv6 /64 blocks. That makes it the largest single country/region in the dataset on both ASN count and IPv4 volume. The figures describe allocation and routing visibility, not active device counts or population-adjusted usage—so read them as registry and routing signals rather than a census of the internet.

What the two ASN columns actually mean

An Autonomous System Number (ASN) identifies a network that presents a single routing policy to the internet. The table splits ASNs into two states:

• Allocated ASNs — the number of ASNs assigned to organizations in that country/region by a registry. This is an administrative count: an ASN can be allocated and sit unused.
• Announced ASNs — the number of ASNs actually visible in global routing (their prefixes appear in BGP). This is the operational count.

The gap between them is the useful signal. For the United States, 32,219 allocated versus 18,855 announced means roughly 41% of allocated ASNs are not visible in routing. A large gap usually points to reserved capacity, dormant allocations, or organizations that hold an ASN but announce through a parent or upstream network instead.

Reading the IP columns

The IPv4 figure is a straight address count, so 1,497,299,200 for the United States is about 1.5 billion addresses. The IPv6 figure is expressed in /64s because a single /64 is the standard subnet size—one /48 contains 65,536 /64s, and one /32 contains about 4.3 billion /64s. That is why the IPv6 column reaches into the hundreds of trillions: the unit is tiny, not the allocation enormous in human terms. Do not compare the IPv4 and IPv6 columns directly; they use different units.

How the United States compares

Using the same four columns across the top countries in the table:

Three patterns stand out:

1. ASN scale is not proportional to IPv4 scale. The United States holds about 3.5× Brazil's allocated ASNs but roughly 19× its IPv4 addresses. China has fewer allocated ASNs than Brazil yet about 4.6× the IPv4 addresses.
2. Announced-to-allocated ratios vary widely. Brazil announces 96% of its allocated ASNs; India announces only about 47%. The United States sits near 59%. A high ratio suggests allocations are actively routed; a low ratio suggests many holders are dormant or route through others.
3. The United States leads both ASN columns and the IPv4 column by a wide margin. No other country/region in the table is close on allocated ASNs, and the IPv4 total is roughly 4× China's, the next largest shown.

What the data does not tell you

• Allocation ≠ usage. An allocated IPv4 address may be unused, parked, or held for future deployment. The table counts registry allocations, not hosts online.
• Announced ≠ allocated. An ASN can be announced from infrastructure physically outside its registered country/region, and a single organization can announce multiple ASNs.
• IPv6 /64 counts are not comparable to IPv4 counts. They measure a different unit of address space.
• No per-capita or per-network normalization. The table gives absolute totals, so larger or more network-dense countries naturally rank higher.

When this data is the right reference

Use the IPIP.NET country/region table when you need to:

• Compare how many independent networks (ASNs) operate in a country/region versus how many are actually routed.
• Gauge the relative size of IPv4 and IPv6 allocations across countries.
• Identify countries with a large allocated-but-unannounced ASN pool, which can indicate dormant registry capacity.

It is not a source for active user counts, traffic volumes, or internet penetration. For those, allocation and routing data are inputs, not answers.

The Russian Federation has 5,752 allocated ASNs and 5,003 announced ASNs, with 47,281,664 IPv4 addresses and roughly 11.49 trillion IPv6 /64 blocks, according to the country-level allocation table published by IPIP.NET. That places it fifth among the listed countries by allocated ASNs, behind the United States, Brazil, China, and India, and ahead of Indonesia and Germany. The figures describe registry-level allocation and routing-level announcement, not how many addresses are actively serving traffic.

What the numbers mean

Two different counts appear for each country, and they answer different questions.

• Allocated ASNs — autonomous system numbers that a regional internet registry has assigned to organizations in that country. This is a measure of how many independent network operators exist on paper.
• Announced ASNs — ASNs actually visible in the global routing table. This is a measure of how many of those operators are running and advertising routes.

For the Russian Federation, 5,003 of 5,752 allocated ASNs are announced, an announcement rate of about 87%. The gap of 749 represents ASNs that are allocated but not currently visible in routing — typically dormant registrations, organizations that stopped operating, or networks that have not yet been deployed.

The same table gives address totals:

The IPv4 figure is the count of addresses associated with announced ASNs, so it reflects routable space rather than the full registry allocation. The IPv6 number is expressed in /64 units, which is the standard way to compare IPv6 holdings because a single /32 allocation already contains 4.3 billion /64s.

How the Russian Federation compares

The table ranks countries by allocated ASNs. The top of that ranking looks like this:

A few observations follow directly from these columns:

• The Russian Federation sits in the middle of the top group by ASN count but has a comparatively high announcement rate. Brazil is the only large country in this set with a higher share of announced ASNs.
• India has a similar allocated ASN count but a much lower announced share, which means a large portion of its registered ASNs are not visible in routing.
• The United States has by far the most ASNs and IPv4 addresses, but its announced share is the lowest in this group — consistent with a large number of legacy or inactive registrations.
• Germany holds more than twice the Russian IPv4 space with roughly half the ASNs, which indicates a different structure: fewer, larger network operators rather than many smaller ones.

Reading the announcement rate

The ratio of announced to allocated ASNs is the most useful single indicator in this table, because it separates registry activity from operational activity.

A high ratio, as in the Russian Federation or Brazil, suggests that most registered network operators are actually running and advertising routes. A low ratio, as in India or the United States, suggests a long tail of registrations that are not currently in use.

This matters for two practical tasks:

1. Judging IP ownership. If an address falls inside an announced ASN, it is reachable and its operator is identifiable through routing data. If it belongs to an allocated but unannounced ASN, ownership records may exist without any live network behind them.
2. Network planning and peering research. The announced ASN count is a rough proxy for how many distinct networks you might need to peer with or route around in a given country. The allocated count is a proxy for how many organizations hold numbering resources there.

Neither number tells you traffic volume, subscriber counts, or market share. A country can have many small ASNs and relatively little traffic, or few large ASNs carrying most of the traffic.

Caveats when using this data

• The table is a snapshot. ASN allocations and announcements change continuously as registries assign new numbers and operators start or stop advertising routes.
• IPv4 counts are tied to announced ASNs, so they exclude space held by organizations whose ASNs are not currently visible.
• IPv6 is counted in /64 blocks, which makes the numbers look enormous but does not mean those blocks are in use. A single allocated /32 produces over four billion /64s.
• Country attribution follows registry records, which reflect where an organization registered, not necessarily where its infrastructure or users are located.

For a quick reference on the Russian Federation's position in global ASN and IP allocation, the figures above are the relevant ones: fifth by allocated ASNs, with a high announcement rate and a mid-sized IPv4 footprint relative to the largest holders.

Amazon.com.au is Amazon's Australian storefront, and it's built for exactly one thing: selling to Australian addresses in Australian dollars. If you're in Australia and want to know whether it's worth using instead of a local retailer or Amazon's US site, the short answer is that it's strongest for electronics, books (including Kindle titles), and everyday household categories, and weakest when you need something fast, bulky, or highly specialised. The rest of this guide covers what it actually stocks, how delivery and Prime work, and how to order and return without surprises.

What Amazon.com.au actually sells

The storefront describes itself as covering electronics, computers, clothing, shoes, toys, books, DVDs, sporting goods, and beauty, among other categories. In practice, the range splits into two very different halves:

• Amazon-retailed and Prime-eligible stock — items Amazon holds or fulfils itself, which behave like a normal local online order.
• Marketplace seller stock — third-party sellers listing on the same site. Selection is wider, but delivery time, shipping cost, and returns are set by each seller, not by Amazon.

Where the range is genuinely competitive:

The practical rule: if the listing is Prime-eligible and sold by Amazon, treat it like any Australian online order. If it's a marketplace listing, read the seller's delivery estimate and return policy before buying.

Pricing, delivery, and shipping for Australian addresses

Prices are shown in Australian dollars, so there's no currency conversion guesswork and no import-duty maths on your side for domestic orders. That's the main structural advantage over ordering from Amazon's US or global sites, where you're converting currency and often paying international shipping.

Delivery works in tiers:

1. Standard delivery — the default, free or low-cost on eligible orders, with a longer window.
2. Expedited/priority delivery — faster, paid, and only available where the fulfilment centre can reach you in time.
3. Marketplace seller delivery — set by the seller; can be slower and may carry its own shipping fee.

Two things to check before you commit:

• The delivery estimate on the product page, not the category page — it reflects your actual postcode.
• Whether the item is Prime-eligible, because that's the single biggest predictor of fast, predictable delivery.

Remote and regional postcodes generally see longer windows and sometimes restricted eligibility. If you're outside a metro area, treat the estimate as a floor, not a promise.

How Amazon Prime changes the maths

Prime is the membership that bundles faster delivery with access to Amazon's digital services. For an Australian shopper, the decision comes down to order frequency:

• If you order several times a month, the delivery speed and included shipping usually justify the fee.
• If you order a few times a year, paying per-order shipping is typically cheaper.

Prime also unlocks the digital side of the store — Kindle Books and eBooks, and the Amazon Appstore — which matters if you already read on a Kindle device such as a Kindle Paperwhite or use a Kindle Fire tablet. If you're only buying physical goods occasionally, evaluate Prime purely on delivery, not on the digital extras you may never open.

Check the current fee and trial terms on the site itself before signing up; membership pricing and benefits change, and the storefront is the only authoritative source.

Setting up an account and placing an order

The flow is standard Amazon:

1. Create an account with your email and a password, or sign in if you already have an Amazon account from another region.
2. Add an Australian delivery address and set it as default — this is what drives the delivery estimates you see.
3. Add a payment method. Amazon.com.au accepts major cards; the exact options are shown at checkout.
4. Search or browse, then filter by Prime eligibility if speed matters.
5. Check the seller name on the listing — "sold by Amazon" versus a third-party name.
6. Review the delivery estimate and total at checkout, including any shipping, before confirming.

Expected result: an order confirmation email with a delivery window. If the window looks wrong for your postcode, stop and re-check the address before paying.

Returns and handling problems

Returns are the part most people get wrong, because the policy depends on who sold the item:

• Amazon-fulfilled items follow Amazon's standard returns window and process — you start the return from your order history and get a label or drop-off instruction.
• Marketplace items follow the individual seller's policy, which can be shorter or require you to cover return postage.

Common sticking points:

• Change-of-mind returns may exclude certain categories (personal care, opened electronics, digital content).
• Digital purchases like Kindle Books are generally not returnable once accessed.
• Damaged or wrong item — report it promptly through the order page rather than contacting the seller off-platform, so there's a record.

Amazon.com.au vs Amazon's US and global sites

For an Australian buyer, the trade-off is straightforward:

Choose the Australian site when you want speed, predictable pricing, and easy returns. Choose a global site only when the item simply isn't available locally and you've confirmed it ships to Australia.

Quick decision guide

• Buying electronics, books, toys, or everyday items? Amazon.com.au is a reasonable default, especially on Prime-eligible listings.
• Need it urgently or it's bulky? Compare against a local retailer first.
• Buying from a marketplace seller? Check their delivery and return terms before paying.
• Ordering frequently? Price out Prime against your shipping spend.
• Want something not stocked locally? Check whether a global Amazon site ships to your address, and factor in conversion and import costs.