Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

winejudging.com

The Largest Competition of American Wines in the World! Award-winning Wines Selected by the Professional Wine Judges of SFCWC.

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 7 Outbound visits 1 Normal
Winejudging.com Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Food & Recipes
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2000
Hosting
CloudflareInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Winejudging.com?

Winejudging.com is the home of the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition (SFCWC), which it describes as the largest competition of American wines. The site serves two main audiences: wineries that enter the competition and consumers or trade buyers looking for award results.

What you'll find on the site

  • Medal winner listings going back many years, including "Best of Class" results and current winners. These are the practical core of the site: if you want to know which wines took medals in a given year, this is where you look.
  • Information for wineries, including entry details and competition categories, plus badge materials for 2026.
  • Judge information: profiles of current judges, former judges, and related event details.
  • News and commentary, such as Mike Dunne's Best of Class tasting notes and coverage of the North American Collegiate Wine Bowl.
  • Event history and background, including ties to the Cloverdale Citrus Fair in Cloverdale, California.

How to use it

If you're a wine buyer or curious shopper, start with the medal winners section for the year you care about, then read the Best of Class notes to understand why particular wines stood out. If you make wine and are considering entering, the winery information pages outline categories and the entry process, and the judge profiles give a sense of who evaluates the wines.

A reasonable next step: browse the most recent Best of Class list and compare it with a prior year to see which producers appear repeatedly, since consistency across vintages is often more telling than a single medal. For broader context on the competition and its results, the San Francisco Chronicle is the publication behind it.

How do I enter my wine in the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition?

Enter through the competition's winery portal. On Winejudging.com, the entry path runs through Wineries → Information for Wineries, where you'll find the current competition's registration materials, badges and directors' contact address. Registration happens before judging; the 2026 competition is already decided (results and Best-of-Class tasting notes are posted), so a new entrant should be working toward the 2027 cycle.

What the entry process involves

  • Register as a winery — you'll create or update a winery account and submit your contact and license details.
  • Choose categories — wines are entered into specific varietal and style categories, listed under "Wine Judging Categories." Getting this right matters, because a wine judged in the wrong class competes against the wrong peers.
  • Submit labels and paperwork — expect to supply label images or copies and the required compliance information for each wine entered.
  • Pay per entry and ship samples — fees are charged per wine, and you send the required number of bottles to the judging site by the published deadline.
  • Watch the deadlines — entry closing dates, sample delivery windows and label submission dates are separate and unforgiving. Missing the delivery window means the wine isn't judged, regardless of payment.

Deciding whether it's worth entering

The San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition is positioned as the largest competition of American wines, which shapes the trade-off:

Consideration What it means for you
Scale and recognition A medal carries broad consumer recognition; retailers and distributors often use it in shelf talkers and marketing
Competition density Large entry pools mean strong wines still miss medals; a single vintage's result says little about your overall quality
Cost and logistics Entry fees, bottles and shipping add up quickly across multiple wines — enter selectively rather than everything you make
Feedback value Judges' scores and comments, where provided, are more useful for improving a wine than the medal itself

A practical next step

If you're planning for 2027, open the Information for Wineries page now and note the fee schedule, category list and shipping address, then build a calendar around those dates. Enter your two or three most commercially important wines first rather than your whole portfolio, and check the previous year's Best of Class results in your category — that tells you what the judges rewarded and whether your style fits. If you want independent context on how medals are used in the market, WineBusiness.com covers competition results and winery marketing practice.

Where can I find the list of medal winners from the current competition?

The current medal winners are listed under Medal Winners → Current Medal Winners on Winejudging.com. That section is the live home for the latest San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition results, and it sits alongside a separate Best of Class page for the top tier of that same year.

Winejudging.com

The site also keeps year-by-year archives, so if you are looking for a specific vintage of results rather than the newest ones, you can jump straight to the year you need:

  • Current Medal Winners — the most recent competition's full medal list
  • Best of Class — the highest-scoring selections from the current competition
  • 2025, 2024, 2023 … back to 2014 Medal Winners — archived results by year

How to use this depending on who you are

If you are… Start here Why
A shopper looking for award-winning bottles now Current Medal Winners Gives you the full field of recognized wines from the latest judging
Someone wanting only the standouts Best of Class Narrower, higher-signal list than the full medal roster
Comparing a wine's track record over time The year-specific archive pages Lets you check whether a winery or label has appeared repeatedly
A winery or trade visitor Information for Wineries and the judges pages Context on categories, judges and entry details rather than shopping

One practical note: medal lists tell you a wine was recognized in a given year, not that the same bottle is still on shelves. Vintages move fast, so match the year on the medal page to the vintage printed on the label before you buy.

How are the Best of Class wines selected and what makes them stand out?

Best of Class is the top tier within the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition, chosen from among the gold-medal winners in each category rather than from the full entry pool. According to the competition's own materials, veteran wine writer Mike Dunne tastes every Best-of-Class selection and provides expert commentary, narrowing the field to a final set of standouts.

How the selection works, step by step

  1. Wines are entered and sorted into judging categories.
  2. Professional judges award medals, with gold as the highest standard medal.
  3. Within each category, the strongest gold-medal wines are advanced to a Best of Class designation.
  4. Best-of-Class winners are then re-tasted and evaluated for the competition's broader honors, such as sweepstakes recognition.

What makes them stand out

  • They are category leaders, not just medalists — the best expression of a specific varietal, style or price tier.
  • They reflect consensus among multiple professional judges rather than a single critic's opinion.
  • They are documented publicly, with results organized by year and by class, which makes them easy to verify and compare.

A practical way to use this If you are choosing a bottle for a dinner or a gift, start with the current Best of Class list and look for a category that matches what you already enjoy. Then read the tasting notes for that wine to see whether the described style — fruit-forward, structured, off-dry — fits your taste. A medal tells you the wine performed well in a blind comparison; the notes tell you whether it suits your palate.

For wineries Entering puts a wine in front of a large panel of professional judges and, if it advances, into a publicly posted result that retailers and consumers can find. The trade-off is that judging is comparative: a strong wine in a crowded category may not advance, while the same wine in a smaller category might. Category choice and vintage timing matter as much as quality.

For the full current and historical results, see Winejudging.com.

Who are the judges for the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition?

The judges are working wine professionals assembled by the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition, and the official site lists them in two groups: current judges and former judges. You can browse both rosters through the competition's own pages at Winejudging.com, which also notes that its judges appear in video commentary about why wineries enter.

What the site makes clear is that judging is done by "professional wine judges," and that the competition publishes a separate annual Best-of-Class commentary written by veteran wine writer Mike Dunne. That is a useful distinction: the panel decides the medals, while Dunne's notes are a journalistic layer on top of the results.

H3 Practical way to use the judge list

  • Before entering: check the current roster to see whether the panel's palate profile matches your wine style and region.
  • After winning: read the Best-of-Class notes to understand how a medal was framed, which helps in shelf talkers and press releases.
  • For consumers: use past medal winners by year to spot producers whose wines consistently place well.

If you want to know who judged a specific year, start with the current judges page, then check the former judges list for names that rotated off. The competition's own medal-winner archives by vintage let you connect a judge era to the results it produced.

What are the key dates and deadlines for the next competition?

The site does not publish a single consolidated calendar of entry deadlines, judging dates and results dates. What it does show is a competition cycle organized around named years, with 2026 and 2027 pages already present alongside an archive of past results.

H3 What the site makes visible

  • A 2026 competition year, including 2026 judging content, a 2026 judges' dinner page and 2026 SFCWC badges.
  • A 2027 competition year, with "Directors' Address 2027" and "2027 Wine Judging Categories" listed.
  • Medal-winner results going back year by year, from current and Best of Class winners through the 2014 archive.
  • Winery-facing information under "Information for Wineries," which is where entry timing would normally live.
  • No explicit deadline dates in the supplied page content, so treat any specific cut-off as something to confirm directly with the organizers.

H3 How to use this

If you are a winery planning an entry, start on the "Information for Wineries" page and the 2027 categories page, then contact the competition directly to confirm the entry window, shipping deadlines and judging week. If you are a buyer, the practical sequence is: judging happens, Best of Class winners are announced, tasting notes follow, and medal lists are posted by year. Watching the current medal-winner page is the fastest way to see results as they land.

For broader context on how American wine competitions and their results are reported, the San Francisco Chronicle's wine coverage at San Francisco Chronicle is a reasonable companion read, and the Cloverdale Citrus Fair at Cloverdale Citrus Fair is the affiliated event the site describes.

H3 Decision criterion

Use the year labels, not a generic "next competition" assumption. The presence of both 2026 and 2027 material means the cycle overlaps: 2026 judging has happened, while 2027 categories and planning pages are already up. Check which year you actually want before relying on any date.

Related questions

More questions →
Who Judges the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition?

The San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition (SFCWC) is evaluated by a panel of professional wine judges, and Winejudging.com publishes who they are. The site maintains a Meet the Judges section for the current roster and a separate Former Judges page for past participants, so you can check both the people scoring this year's entries and the history of the panel. If you want to know the judging lineup before entering wines or before trusting a medal, those two pages are the starting point.

Where the judge information lives on Winejudging.com

The site organizes judging-related content under its Judges area, alongside the competition's other reference pages:

  • Meet the Judges — the current panel for the competition.
  • Former Judges — judges who have served in earlier years.
  • 2026 Judges' Dinner — a related event tied to the competition and its judges.
  • Wine Judging Categories — the categories judges evaluate entries within.
  • Medal Winners — results by year, including a Best of Class designation and an archive going back through 2014.

The site describes the competition as "The Largest Competition of American Wines in the World," with award-winning wines "Selected by the Professional Wine Judges of SFCWC." That framing tells you the panel is positioned as professional rather than consumer or crowd-sourced.

What "professional wine judges" means here

The site's own description identifies the selectors as professional wine judges, but it does not publish individual credentials, certifications, or biographical detail in the material available. So the reliable, checkable facts are:

Question What the site supports
Who judges? A panel of professional wine judges
Can I see the current panel? Yes — Meet the Judges
Can I see past panels? Yes — Former Judges
Are individual credentials listed? Not in the available page content
Is there a judges' event? Yes — the 2026 Judges' Dinner

If you need to verify a specific judge's background, treat the Meet the Judges page as the entry point and look for linked bios or press material rather than assuming credentials that aren't shown.

How judging connects to results you can check

Judging output shows up in the competition's medal structure. The site publishes Current Medal Winners plus year-by-year archives (2025 back to 2014), and it distinguishes Best of Class selections within those results. Veteran wine writer Mike Dunne provides expert commentary on the Best-of-Class winners each year; for 2026, the site notes he evaluated every Best-of-Class selection before narrowing the field. That gives you a way to cross-check a judge panel's decisions against an independent taster's notes.

Practical steps to confirm the judging panel

  1. Go to Winejudging.com and open the Judges section.
  2. Select Meet the Judges for the current competition panel.
  3. Select Former Judges if you need historical participation.
  4. Cross-reference with Wine Judging Categories to see what those judges are scoring.
  5. Check Medal Winners and Best of Class for the outcomes, and read Mike Dunne's tasting notes for context on top selections.

Common sticking points

  • Roster changes year to year. A judge listed under Former Judges may not be on the current panel — check the current page for this year's lineup.
  • Limited public credentials. The available site content names the panel as professional judges but doesn't itemize certifications, so don't infer specific qualifications that aren't published.
  • Judges vs. results are separate pages. The judging roster and the medal results live in different sections; you'll need both to connect a panel to an outcome.

For wineries deciding whether to enter, the judges' page is worth reviewing first — it tells you who is evaluating your wine and lets you judge whether the panel's profile matches your target market.

What Is Winejudging.com and What Does It Cover?

Winejudging.com is the official website of the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition (SFCWC), which the site describes as the largest competition of American wines in the world. It is a reference and information hub rather than a shop: the main things you can do there are look up competition results (medal winners and Best of Class selections by year), read judging-related news and tasting commentary, and — if you are a winery — find entry information for upcoming competitions.

What the site actually provides

Competition results and medal winners

The site organizes results by year, with a "Current Medal Winners" section plus archived results going back through 2015 (2015–2025 are listed in the navigation, alongside a Best of Class category). If you want to check whether a specific wine medaled in a given year, this archive is the core reason to visit.

Best of Class commentary

For each competition, veteran wine writer Mike Dunne tastes the Best-of-Class winners and writes expert tasting notes. The site notes that for the 2026 competition he evaluated every Best-of-Class selection before narrowing the field. This is useful if you want context on top-scoring wines rather than just a medal list.

Information for wineries

There is a dedicated "Information for Wineries" section, along with pages for wine judging categories, badges for the 2026 SFCWC, and a directors' address. Wineries considering entry should start here to understand categories and logistics.

Judges and event background

You can browse "Meet the Judges," a "Former Judges" list, and a "2026 Judges' Dinner" page, plus an Event History section. The site also hosts a video in which judges discuss the benefits of entering the competition.

News, media, and related events

The PR & Media section includes news and articles and an "SFCWC In the News" page. The site also links to the Cloverdale Citrus Fair in Cloverdale, California, held each year over Presidents Day weekend in February.

Quick reference

Section What you'll find
Medal Winners Current and archived results, 2015–2025, plus Best of Class
Judges Current judges, former judges, judges' dinner
Wineries Entry information, judging categories, badges
PR & Media News, articles, press mentions
Event History Background on the competition

Things to know before you use it

  • The site is informational. It does not present itself as a place to buy wine; it notes it may earn affiliate commission from qualifying purchases made through its links, so some outbound links may be commercial.
  • Results are split between "Current" and year-by-year archives, so if you are looking for an older vintage's result, go straight to the specific year rather than the current list.
  • Entry deadlines, fees, and eligibility rules are not stated in the material available here — check the "Information for Wineries" page directly if you plan to enter.
San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition: History and Background

The San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition (SFCWC) is presented on winejudging.com as "the largest competition of American wines in the world," with award-winning wines selected by professional wine judges. The site documents the competition's past through a dedicated Event History section and links it to the Cloverdale Citrus Fair in Cloverdale, California, which is held each year over Presidents Day weekend in February and described as California's earliest annual fair. The competition has also expanded to include newer events such as the North American Collegiate Wine Bowl.

What the Competition Is

Winejudging.com is the online home of the SFCWC. Its stated purpose is to showcase a competition in which professional wine judges evaluate American wines and select award-winning entries. The site organizes results and related content around that core function.

Key points from the site:

  • The competition is described as the largest of its kind for American wines.
  • Judging is carried out by professional wine judges.
  • Results are published as medal winners, including a "Best of Class" designation.

The Cloverdale Citrus Fair Connection

The site ties the competition to the Cloverdale Citrus Fair in Cloverdale, California. According to the site, the fair is steeped in small-town charm, tradition, and family fun, and takes place each year over Presidents Day weekend in February as California's earliest annual fair.

This association places the competition within a long-running regional event rather than presenting it as a standalone tasting.

Event History on the Site

Winejudging.com maintains an Event History section covering the competition's past. This is the primary place to look for background on how the competition has developed over time.

Medal Winners by Year

The site publishes medal results organized by year, which lets visitors trace the competition's recent record. The years listed on the site include:

Category Years Listed
Current Medal Winners Current competition
Best of Class 2025
Medal Winners 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014

This year-by-year archive is the most direct way to see how the competition's outcomes have been recorded over the past decade.

Newer Additions: The Collegiate Wine Bowl

The competition has expanded beyond its original format. At the 2026 SFCWC, the first North American Collegiate Wine Bowl was held, and College Cellars of Walla Walla Community College in southeastern Washington state was the sweepstakes winner.

The site also notes that veteran wine writer Mike Dunne provides expert commentary on Best-of-Class winners. For the 2026 competition, Mike evaluated every Best-of-Class selection before narrowing the field.

Where to Go Next

If you want to explore the competition's background, the Event History section and the year-by-year medal winner pages are the main resources on winejudging.com. For current results, start with the Current Medal Winners and Best of Class listings; for historical context, work backward through the annual medal winner archives.

What Wineries Should Know About Entering the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition

Wineries enter the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition (SFCWC) by submitting wines for evaluation under the competition's published judging categories, where they are assessed by a panel of professional wine judges. Winejudging.com is the competition's own site, and it maintains a dedicated "Information for Wineries" section, a published list of judging categories, judge profiles, and contact details for the competition directors. If you are deciding whether and how to enter, the site is the authoritative starting point for categories, judges, and results — but you should confirm current deadlines, fees, and shipping logistics directly with the competition, since those operational details are not fully spelled out in the site's public pages.

What the competition is

The SFCWC describes itself as the largest competition of American wines, with award-winning wines selected by professional wine judges. Its results are published on Winejudging.com, including:

  • Current medal winners
  • Best of Class selections
  • Archived medal winners by year (2014 through 2025 are listed on the site)

The competition also has a public-facing media presence, with news and articles, an "SFCWC In the News" section, and tasting notes from veteran wine writer Mike Dunne, who evaluates each year's Best-of-Class selections.

The winery-facing parts of the site

If you are considering entering, these are the sections built for you:

Section What it gives you
Information for Wineries The entry-oriented hub for producers
Wine Judging Categories How entries are classified for judging
Judges / Meet the Judges / Former Judges Who evaluates the wines
Directors' Address Contact point for the competition
2026 SFCWC Badges Entry-related badge materials
Medal Winners (current and by year) How results are published after judging

The presence of a winery information section, defined categories, named judges, and a directors' contact address tells you the competition is structured for producer participation rather than being only a results archive.

How judging is organized

Entries are sorted into wine judging categories, which is the mechanism that makes results comparable — wines are evaluated against others of the same type rather than against the entire field. Judging is performed by professional wine judges whose profiles are published on the site, so you can see who is evaluating your category before you enter. The competition also runs adjacent programs, including the 2026 SFCWC North American Collegiate Wine Bowl, whose first sweepstakes winner was College Cellars of Walla Walla Community College.

Practical steps before you enter

  1. Read the Information for Wineries section to understand what the competition expects of entrants.
  2. Check the wine judging categories and confirm your wine fits a category — category fit determines what your wine is judged against.
  3. Review the judge list for your category if knowing the panel matters to your decision.
  4. Contact the directors using the published Directors' Address for anything the site does not answer, such as current deadlines, fees, and shipping instructions.
  5. Plan around results publication — the site publishes current medal winners and Best of Class, plus year-by-year archives, so you know where your results will appear.

Common sticking points

  • Operational details are not all on the public pages. Deadlines, entry fees, and logistics are not spelled out in the site content available here — treat the directors' contact as the source for these rather than assuming.
  • Category choice matters. Because judging is category-based, entering the wrong category changes your competitive set.
  • Badges and results are separate from entry. The 2026 SFCWC Badges and the medal winner archives are post-judging materials; they tell you what you get if you place, not how to enter.

Bottom line

Winejudging.com gives wineries the structural information needed to evaluate the SFCWC: a winery information section, defined judging categories, published judge profiles, a directors' contact, and a clear record of how results are published. Use those to decide whether the competition fits your goals, then confirm current entry terms with the directors before submitting.

How to Find San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition Medal Winners on Winejudging.com

Winejudging.com is the official site of the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition (SFCWC), and it publishes results under a Medal Winners section. To find a specific winner, start there and choose either the Current Medal Winners page or the individual year you need — past years are listed separately from 2014 through 2025. If you want the competition's top selections rather than the full medal list, use the Best of Class page instead.

Where the results live

The site groups results by competition year, so the first decision is which year you want. The navigation includes:

  • Current Medal Winners — the most recent competition's results
  • Best of Class — the top selections, highlighted separately from the full medal list
  • Year-by-year medal winner pages — 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025

Because each year has its own page, results are not searchable across all years from a single list. Pick the year first, then look for the category or winery you have in mind.

Step by step

  1. Go to winejudging.com.
  2. Open the Medal Winners section in the navigation.
  3. Choose Current Medal Winners for the latest results, or select a specific year (2014–2025) for an earlier competition.
  4. Browse the list for the category, winery, or wine you're looking for.
  5. If you want the competition's highest honors rather than every medal, open the Best of Class page.

Expected result: you land on a year-specific list of awarded wines, or on the Best of Class selections for the year you chose.

Best of Class and tasting notes

The Best of Class page is a separate entry point from the full medal lists. For each competition, veteran wine writer Mike Dunne tastes the Best-of-Class winners and provides expert commentary, narrowing the field to his top picks. The 2026 competition notes follow this pattern. If your goal is "what were the standout wines this year" rather than "did this specific wine medal," Best of Class is the faster route.

Common snags

  • Wrong year. Medal winner pages are year-specific. If a wine isn't showing up, confirm you're on the correct competition year's page.
  • Looking for a medal in the wrong section. A wine can appear in the full medal list without being a Best of Class selection; the two are different pages.
  • Assuming one search covers everything. Results are organized by year, so there's no single cross-year list to scan.

Related pages worth knowing

  • Wineries → Information for Wineries — entry and participation details for producers.
  • Judges → Meet the Judges / Former Judges — who evaluates the wines.
  • Event History and Cloverdale Citrus Fair — background on the competition and its host event.
  • News & Articles and SFCWC In the News — press coverage and write-ups.

If you already know the year and the wine, the fastest path is: Medal Winners → that year → scan the list. If you want the headline results, go straight to Best of Class.

Website Overview

Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2000, this domain has about 25 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by Cloudflare, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown. TXT records include verification markers for Google. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued within the Google Trust Services cloud or CDN ecosystem. The certificate's total validity is about 90 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The response lacks these common security headers: Permissions-Policy. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The cf-ray response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies cloudflare without an exact version.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.2, WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

The Generator tag identifies All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.2, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. Open Graph is partially configured; og:image is missing. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity. The title has 57 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 126 characters.

Hosting and Email

DNSCloudflare
HostingCloudflare
EmailGoogle Workspace
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) Location unknown Inferred 104.21.52.81

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarNetwork Solutions, LLC
Registered2000-11-15
Expires2028-11-15
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserverslucy.ns.cloudflare.com、piotr.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Awww.winejudging.com104.21.52.81300—
Awww.winejudging.com172.67.196.236300—
AAAAwww.winejudging.com2606:4700:3032::6815:3451300—
AAAAwww.winejudging.com2606:4700:3032::ac43:c4ec300—
MXwinejudging.comaspmx.l.google.com36001
MXwinejudging.comalt1.aspmx.l.google.com36005
MXwinejudging.comalt2.aspmx.l.google.com36005
MXwinejudging.comalt3.aspmx.l.google.com360010
MXwinejudging.comalt4.aspmx.l.google.com360010
NSwinejudging.comlucy.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
NSwinejudging.compiotr.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
TXTwinejudging.comgoogle-site-verification=WPz2BadVNo8Vg8UFpzceGdjxBpNuTP9tf1eO8-orJLU3600—
TXTwinejudging.comv=spf1 include:secureserver.net include:_spf.google.com ~all3600—
DMARC_dmarc.winejudging.comv=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectwinejudging.com
IssuerGoogle Trust Services
Valid until2026-12-22T16:45 · Remaining when checked: 86 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-controlprivate, must-revalidate
servercloudflare
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000
content-security-policyupgrade-insecure-requests
x-frame-optionsSAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
referrer-policyno-referrer-when-downgrade
permissions-policy

Identified technologies

All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.2WordPressjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionThe Largest Competition of American Wines in the World! Award-winning Wines Selected by the Professional Wine Judges of SFCWC.
Canonical URLhttps://www.winejudging.com/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter CardNot detected
All bots 1 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Allow/wp/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php
  • Disallow/wp/wp-admin/

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.