Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

theagi.company

AGI, Inc. builds AGI-0, a small action model, and an agent that sees the screen and acts across any app on Android. No APIs or integrations, private by design.

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 1 Outbound visits 11 Normal
AGI, Inc. | Private action AI for phones and devices Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Artificial Intelligence
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2023
Hosting
Amazon.com, Inc.Inferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is AGI, Inc.?

AGI, Inc. is a company building on-device “action AI” for phones and computers. Its main product, AGI-0, is described as a small action model paired with an agent that sees the screen and acts across apps on Android—handling tasks through the interface rather than through APIs or integrations. The emphasis is on privacy (processing on the device), speed, and hands-free operation. The site also mentions a platform for developers to build action agents.

What it appears to do

  • Act across apps by reading the screen and performing actions, rather than relying on app APIs.
  • Run locally on the device, which supports offline use and privacy-sensitive tasks.
  • Learn user preferences over time and act as a “proactive collaborator.”
  • Support examples such as ordering groceries, booking a ride based on travel conditions, scheduling lessons, and finding and playing a playlist from a message.

Who it is for

  • Everyday Android users who want to offload repetitive multi-app tasks and reduce screen time.
  • Privacy-conscious users who prefer on-device processing to cloud-based agents.
  • Developers interested in shipping an action agent using the company’s platform.

Trade-offs to weigh

The screen-based approach can work with apps that lack APIs, but it may be more fragile than direct integrations when interfaces change. On-device processing helps privacy and offline use, though the site’s claim of 100% on AndroidWorld (116/116 tasks) is a benchmark result, not a guarantee for arbitrary real-world tasks.

Next step: If you use Android and have a repetitive multi-app workflow, identify one concrete task—such as reordering a standard grocery list—and check whether AGI-0 supports your device and apps before relying on it for anything time-sensitive.

How does AGI-0 control apps on my Android phone without APIs or integrations?

AGI-0 works by seeing the screen and acting on it the way a person would, rather than connecting to apps through their APIs. According to the product's page, it is an on-device action model that "sees the screen and acts across any app on Android," and the company describes it as needing "no APIs or integrations."

In practice, that means the agent interprets what is displayed—buttons, menus, text fields, lists—and then performs the taps, typing, and navigation that complete a task. Because it operates through the visible interface, it can reach apps that never offered an integration path. The page's own examples show this pattern: ordering ingredients in Instacart, comparing a train against a ride and booking one, finding tennis lessons that fit a schedule, and pulling a playlist from Messages to play in Spotify.

What this design buys you

  • Coverage: Any app with a usable screen is potentially in scope, including ones with no public API.
  • Privacy: The model lives on the device, so the page states it works offline and on wearables, which suits privacy-sensitive tasks.
  • Personalization: It learns your preferences over time, so repeated tasks can get smoother.

The trade-offs to weigh

  • Interface dependence: Screen-based control is only as reliable as the screen itself. Layout changes, pop-ups, or unusual states can trip up any agent working this way, so expect occasional supervision on multi-step tasks.
  • Platform scope: The page frames this around Android phones and computers; check current device support before assuming your hardware is covered.
  • Verification: The page cites a 100% result on AndroidWorld (116/116 tasks), a benchmark of scripted Android tasks. Treat that as evidence of capability on standardized tests, not a guarantee for your particular banking app or a messy real-world flow.

A useful next step: pick one recurring chore—say, a weekly grocery order—and run it with the agent while watching the first few times. If it completes the flow cleanly, expand to tasks with more steps, like the travel example where it checks the train before booking a ride. For background on the Android ecosystem the agent operates within, see Android.

Is AGI-0 private enough for sensitive tasks like banking or messaging?

AGI-0 is designed for privacy-sensitive use: the model runs on the device, and the agent works by seeing the screen and acting across apps without APIs or integrations. That architecture is the main reason it can plausibly handle messaging and other sensitive tasks—your data doesn't need to leave the phone to drive the automation. AGI, Inc. also explicitly positions offline use and privacy-sensitive tasks as supported scenarios.

For banking specifically, treat that as a judgment call rather than a settled yes. On-device processing reduces exposure, but an agent that reads your screen and taps through apps still sees whatever is displayed, including balances and one-time codes. Whether that's acceptable depends on your own risk tolerance and on controls the product may or may not offer (confirmations before actions, app exclusions, logging). The site's evidence covers the privacy model, not a banking-specific guarantee.

A practical way to decide:

  • Messaging: a good fit for drafting, finding a playlist a contact sent, or scheduling—low-stakes actions where an on-device agent saves real time.
  • Banking and payments: start with read-only or low-value tasks and keep human confirmation on anything that moves money.
  • Anything regulated or irreversible: verify what confirmation and audit features exist before relying on it.

As a next step, test one contained task in each category—ask it to find a message and summarize it, then watch exactly what it does before letting it act on a financial app. For comparison on how other assistant approaches handle on-device versus cloud processing, Apple describes its own on-device privacy approach for Apple Intelligence.

How do I get access to AGI-0 or try a demo on my own device?

The site presents AGI-0 as an on-device action model for Android, and its access path is a request rather than a public download: the page offers "Get access" alongside "Book a call," so the practical route is to request access for your device and, if you want to see it first, watch the demo linked from the homepage. There is no indication of a self-serve install or a public trial build, so treat access as something granted after contact rather than something you can set up yourself today.

What to expect from the request

  • Device fit: AGI-0 is described as working on Android by seeing the screen and acting across apps, without APIs or integrations. If your target device isn't Android, ask directly whether anything is available for it.
  • Privacy claims: the page says the model lives on the device and works offline. Ask how that holds for the specific tasks you care about, since any action that reaches a live service still depends on that app.
  • Evaluation evidence: the site cites 100% on AndroidWorld (116/116 tasks). That's a benchmark result, not a guarantee for your own apps and accounts, so plan a small set of real tasks to test.

A useful next step

Before you book a call, write down three tasks you'd want it to complete on your own phone—for example, ordering a specific grocery list, booking a ride conditionally on a delay, or finding something in your messages and playing it. Bring those to the conversation and ask whether they can be demonstrated on your device or a comparable one. If a hands-on trial isn't offered, ask what the demo shows and which apps it covers, so you can judge the gap between the demo and your daily use.

For broader context on on-device assistant approaches, Android covers platform-level automation features, though they differ from a screen-reading action agent.

Can developers build their own action agent using AGI, Inc.'s platform?

Yes. AGI, Inc. presents a platform aimed at developers, and its page states that you can "ship a working action agent in less than a day" by dropping the platform in. The company's own product, AGI-0, is described as a small on-device action model that sees the screen and acts across apps on Android without APIs or integrations, so the platform is positioned around that same screen-based approach rather than app-by-app connectors.

What that means in practice

  • Screen-level control: An agent built on this approach would interpret what is on screen and act, rather than relying on each app's API. That suits Android apps that have no public API or where integrations are impractical.
  • On-device emphasis: The page stresses that AGI-0 runs locally, works offline, and is "private by design." Developers building privacy-sensitive or offline tools should treat that as the intended design direction.
  • Fast prototyping: The "less than a day" claim is a vendor statement about time to a working agent. Treat it as an aspiration to test, not a guarantee; a realistic first milestone is a single, well-scoped task on one app.

A concrete reader scenario

A developer wants an agent that reads a message containing a playlist link and opens it in a music app. With a screen-based agent, the flow is: observe the messaging screen, identify the relevant message, then act in the music app. That is the kind of cross-app task the page highlights, and it is a sensible first project to validate the platform before expanding to shopping or travel workflows.

Decision criteria

If your priority is… Consider
Apps without APIs, Android-only Screen-based action fits well
Strict data locality or offline use On-device design is the main draw
Deep, reliable integrations in many services API-based agent frameworks may be more predictable
A quick proof of concept Start with one task, one app, and measure success

Next step: Define a single test task with a clear pass/fail (for example, "find the playlist message and start playback"), then check the platform's documentation and access terms at AGI, Inc. to confirm device requirements and how to get access before committing engineering time.

How does AGI-0 compare to other phone AI assistants in real-world task performance?

AGI-0's own benchmark claim is unusually specific: the site says it scores 100% on AndroidWorld (116/116 tasks). Treat that as a figure published by AGI, Inc. on its own site, not an independent comparison. The site's pitch is that AGI-0 works by seeing the screen and acting across any app on Android, with no APIs or integrations, and runs on the device. That approach is what would let it handle apps that other assistants can't reach, and it's also where its limits would show.

What the claim does and doesn't tell you

AndroidWorld is a set of scripted Android tasks, so a perfect score speaks to completing those defined flows reliably. It says little about the messier conditions of daily use: apps that change layout, logins and two-factor prompts, payment confirmations, or tasks that need a judgment call. A real-world comparison would look at:

  • Coverage: whether the assistant can act in the apps you actually use, rather than only in apps with official integrations.
  • Reliability under change: how it behaves when a screen looks different from what it was trained on.
  • Privacy: whether actions and screen contents stay on the device. AGI, Inc. says AGI-0 lives on the device and works offline, which matters for banking, health and messaging.
  • Recovery: what happens when a step fails halfway through a booking or order.

How to judge it against alternatives

Criterion Why it decides the comparison
Integration model Screen-reading agents can reach more apps but are more fragile; API-based assistants are steadier but limited to supported services
Where processing happens On-device favors privacy and offline use; cloud assistants often handle heavier reasoning
Task type Ordering groceries or booking rides suits an action agent; open-ended questions may suit a conversational assistant
Failure handling Ask what it does when a confirmation screen or CAPTCHA appears

A practical next step: pick three tasks you do weekly, such as reordering groceries, booking a ride when your train is late, and finding a playlist a friend sent. Run each on AGI-0 and on whatever assistant your phone ships with, and note where each one stalls. That tells you more about real-world fit than any single benchmark. For background on the broader assistant landscape, OpenAI and Google DeepMind publish material on their own agent work.

Related questions

More questions →
What Is AGI, Inc. and What Does the Company Build?

AGI, Inc. is a company building private, on-device action AI for phones and computers. Its core products are AGI-0, a small "action model," and an agent that sees the screen and acts across apps on Android — without APIs or integrations. The company positions this as a privacy-first alternative to cloud-dependent assistants, and it serves two audiences: individuals who want hands-free control of their devices, and developers who want to build action agents on its platform.

What AGI-0 actually is

AGI-0 is described as a small action model that lives on the device rather than in the cloud. Two properties follow from that design:

  • It learns locally. The site states AGI-0 learns your preferences and improves over time, and that it remembers what you like.
  • It works without app integrations. Instead of connecting to services through APIs, the agent sees the screen and acts across any app on Android — the same way a person would tap through an interface.

The company reports AGI-0 scoring 100% on AndroidWorld (116/116 tasks), a benchmark for Android task automation. That figure comes from AGI, Inc. itself and reflects a specific benchmark, not general real-world reliability.

What the agent can do

The site frames the product around hands-free task completion across everyday app categories. Its own examples show the intended scope:

Category Example prompt from the site
Groceries & shopping Order all the ingredients I need to make gluten-free spaghetti on Instacart
Travel & rideshare Find the fastest route to the airport and book a ride if the train is delayed
Messaging & scheduling Find the most suitable place for tennis lessons in my schedule for the next 6 months
Media & entertainment Find the playlist Jake sent me in Messages and play it on Spotify

These examples share a pattern: a natural-language goal that spans multiple apps and requires reading context (messages, schedules, routes) before acting. That is the capability the "action model" label refers to — not conversation, but execution.

The site also states the agent works offline, on wearables, and for privacy-sensitive tasks. Those claims are the company's own; no independent testing is provided on the page.

Who it's for

Individuals who want to offload busywork on their phone — the pitch is explicitly about reclaiming time ("Focus on your life, not your screen"). The privacy angle matters most for people uncomfortable with a cloud assistant reading their screen.

Developers who want to ship an action agent quickly. The company says you can "ship a working action agent in less than a day" using its platform, and references MCP (Model Context Protocol) in its site navigation, suggesting a protocol-based integration path for builders.

What to verify before committing

The page does not list pricing, subscription terms, or login requirements, so cost and access conditions are unknown from this source alone. Before signing up, check:

  1. Device support — Android is named explicitly; the site mentions phones and computers, but confirm your specific hardware, including wearables.
  2. Access model — the site has "Get access" and "Book a call" calls to action, which suggests gated or waitlist-based onboarding rather than open sign-up.
  3. Benchmark context — the 116/116 AndroidWorld result is a controlled benchmark; ask how the agent handles apps and flows outside that set.
  4. Data handling — "private by design" and on-device processing are stated, but the specifics of what leaves the device (if anything) are not detailed on the page.

If your goal is hands-free Android automation with local processing, AGI, Inc. is directly relevant. If you need cross-platform support beyond Android, documented pricing, or third-party validation of the benchmark claims, those answers aren't on the site and are worth requesting directly.

Can Developers Build on AGI, Inc.'s Platform, and What Should They Evaluate?

Yes—AGI, Inc. explicitly invites developers to build on its platform, and its site claims you can "ship a working action agent in less than a day." That claim is worth testing against your own use case, because the platform's design choices (an on-device action model, no API integrations, screen-level control) shape both what you can build and what you need to verify before committing.

What the platform is built on

AGI, Inc. builds AGI-0, described as a small action model that lives on the device, plus an agent that sees the screen and acts across any app on Android. Two properties follow from that architecture and matter most to developers:

  • No APIs or integrations required. The agent operates through the screen rather than through app APIs, so in principle it can act inside apps that expose no developer interface.
  • Private by design and on-device. The model runs locally, learns user preferences over time, and the company states it works offline, on wearables, and for privacy-sensitive tasks.

The site also reports that AGI-0 scores 100% on AndroidWorld (116/116 tasks). Treat that as a vendor-reported benchmark: it tells you the model handles a defined task suite, not that it will handle your specific workflows.

Evaluate these dimensions before you build

Dimension What the site says What to verify with AGI, Inc.
Time to first agent "Ship a working action agent in less than a day" What "working" means in the platform's terms—scope of a minimal agent, and what setup precedes it
Device and OS coverage Android; also mentions wearables and computer Exact supported devices and OS versions for your target users
App coverage Acts across any app via screen understanding Behavior in your specific apps, including ones with unusual UI or login flows
Integration model No APIs or integrations How your backend or data connects, if at all, given the screen-level approach
Privacy handling On-device model, works offline, private by design Data flows during setup, updates, and any cloud-assisted steps
Access "Get access" and "Book a call" on the site Access conditions, onboarding steps, and any commercial terms

The access row deserves emphasis: the site offers "Get access" and "Book a call" rather than self-serve signup details, and it publishes no pricing. Do not assume free or open access—confirm eligibility and terms directly.

A practical evaluation path

  1. Define one narrow task you would want an agent to complete—for example, ordering a specific set of grocery items in a shopping app, or booking a ride conditionally when a train is delayed (both are task types the site itself illustrates).
  2. Request access and book a call through the site's "Get access" and "Book a call" entry points, and ask specifically about supported devices, app coverage, and privacy handling during onboarding.
  3. Build the smallest agent the platform allows and time it, to test the "less than a day" claim against your team's actual setup effort.
  4. Test on your real apps and devices, not just demo scenarios—screen-based agents are sensitive to UI variation, so check the apps your users rely on.
  5. Confirm the privacy story end to end, since on-device operation is the platform's central selling point and the main reason to choose it over API-based automation.

When this platform fits—and when it doesn't

It is a reasonable fit if you need an agent that operates inside third-party Android apps you don't control, and if keeping action data on the device is a priority for your users or your compliance posture. It is a weaker fit if your workflows already have clean APIs (direct integration will be more predictable), if you need platforms beyond those AGI, Inc. supports, or if you require published pricing and self-serve onboarding before you can start.

The decisive step is the call: the site's claims about speed, coverage, and privacy are specific enough to test, but the access and commercial details you need for a build decision are not on the page.

What Everyday Tasks Can AGI, Inc.'s Hands-Free Agent Handle?

AGI, Inc.'s hands-free agent can handle multi-step tasks that normally require you to open several apps and tap through them yourself — ordering groceries on Instacart, comparing routes and booking a rideshare, finding a long-term activity that fits your schedule, and locating a playlist in your messages and playing it on Spotify. The key condition is that the agent works by seeing the screen and acting across apps on Android, rather than through app APIs or integrations, so it operates the same apps you already use.

How the agent approaches a task

AGI, Inc. builds AGI-0, described on its site as a small action model, plus an agent that "sees the screen and acts across any app on Android." The company says AGI-0 lives on the device, learns your preferences over time, and works offline, on wearables, and for privacy-sensitive tasks. That on-device design is also why the site frames the product as "private by design."

Practically, this means you state a goal in natural language and the agent carries out the steps inside your apps. The examples below come from the prompts shown on the company's site.

Task examples the site demonstrates

Everyday need What you'd ask What the agent does
Groceries & shopping "Order all the ingredients I need to make gluten-free spaghetti on Instacart" Opens Instacart and places the order for the needed ingredients
Travel & rideshare "Find the fastest route to the airport and book a ride if the train is delayed" Checks routes, evaluates the train status, and books a ride when the condition is met
Scheduling an activity "Find the most suitable place for tennis lessons in my schedule for the next 6 months" Searches options and matches them against your calendar over a six-month window
Messaging & media "Find the playlist Jake sent me in Messages and play it on Spotify" Locates the playlist in your messages and starts playback in Spotify

Two things stand out in these examples. First, several tasks are conditional or long-running — "if the train is delayed" and "for the next 6 months" — so the agent is meant to handle decisions and time windows, not just single taps. Second, the tasks cross app boundaries: Messages to Spotify, calendar to a booking site.

What to check before relying on it

  • Platform: The action agent is described for Android phones and devices. If you use another mobile platform, the cross-app screen control described here may not apply.
  • App coverage: The site's claim is "any app," with the examples above as illustrations. For a task you care about, confirm the specific app is one the agent can operate in your setup.
  • Access: The site shows "Get access" and "Book a call" entry points rather than a self-serve download, so availability may be limited or gated. The page evidence does not state pricing or whether access is free.
  • Benchmark context: The site reports AGI-0 at "100% on AndroidWorld (116/116 tasks)." That is the company's own reported figure on a benchmark of Android tasks, not a guarantee for your particular apps or account state.

Who this fits

This kind of agent suits people who want to delegate routine, multi-app chores — restocking groceries, coordinating a trip, scheduling recurring activities, or digging up something a friend sent — without switching between apps manually. If your work stays inside one app or you need guaranteed behavior on a specific service, test that exact task first; the value of a screen-acting agent depends on the apps and conditions you actually use.

How AGI, Inc. Keeps Its Action AI Private by Design

AGI, Inc.'s privacy model rests on one architectural choice: AGI-0, its action model, lives on the device rather than in the cloud. Because the agent sees the screen and acts across apps directly on the phone, it doesn't need APIs or third-party integrations to reach your data — and the company frames the result as "private by design." This matters most if you want an agent that can operate across sensitive apps without shipping your screen contents to a remote service.

What "on-device" actually changes

The company describes AGI-0 as a "small action model" that "lives on the device." That single fact drives the rest of the privacy story:

  • No API layer to expose. The agent works by seeing the screen and acting across any app on Android, rather than by connecting to services through APIs or integrations. Fewer integration endpoints means fewer places where credentials or data are handed to a third party.
  • Screen content stays local. Since the model runs where the screen is, the observation-and-action loop happens on the phone itself. The site's own framing is that data stays on the user's device.
  • It works offline. AGI, Inc. states AGI-0 "works offline, on wearables, and privacy-sensitive tasks" — an offline capability is only possible if the core action loop doesn't depend on a remote server.

A concrete example

Take the site's own demo prompt: "Find the playlist Jake sent me in Messages and play it on Spotify." A cloud-integrated agent would typically need read access to your messaging app and a Spotify connection. AGI-0 instead reads the screen, finds the message, and drives the Spotify app the way you would. The message content and your account aren't passed through an integration — the action happens on the device.

Where privacy and capability meet

The design isn't only about withholding data; it's also what enables certain tasks. The company positions AGI-0 for "privacy-sensitive tasks" and for wearables, where a cloud round-trip would be impractical. It also says the model "learns your preferences and gets better over time" while living on the device — so personalization is described as happening locally rather than by training on a server-side profile.

Claim on the site What it implies for privacy
AGI-0 lives on the device The action loop runs locally, not in the cloud
No APIs or integrations No third-party connection layer holding your credentials
Works offline Core actions don't require sending screen data out
Suited to privacy-sensitive tasks The company targets exactly the use cases cloud agents handle poorly

What the page does not establish

The site is a product and marketing page, so treat the privacy claims as the company's stated design intent, not an audited guarantee. It does not publish a technical whitepaper on the page, detail what telemetry (if any) leaves the device, or describe encryption or data-retention practices. If your decision depends on those specifics — for example, deploying it in a regulated environment — ask AGI, Inc. directly through the "Book a call" or "Get access" routes on the site before relying on the on-device claim.

Who this design suits

Choose this approach if your priority is keeping screen-level activity on the phone and you want an agent that reaches apps without you wiring up integrations. Look elsewhere — or get answers in writing first — if you need documented compliance controls, third-party security audits, or clarity on any data that may still leave the device. The privacy-by-design pitch is coherent and specific about mechanism; the open questions are about verification, not architecture.

What Is AGI-0 and What Can It Do on an Android Device?

AGI-0 is a small action model built by AGI, Inc. that runs on the device and operates Android apps by seeing the screen and acting on it, rather than connecting through APIs or integrations. It is designed for hands-free task completion across the apps already on your phone, and because it lives on the device it can work offline and learn your preferences over time. It suits users who want an agent to handle multi-step phone tasks privately, without setting up app integrations.

How AGI-0 works

AGI-0 takes a spoken or written instruction, reads what is on the screen, and performs the taps and actions needed to complete the task inside whatever app is relevant. The company describes it as an agent that "sees the screen and acts across any app on Android," with no APIs or integrations required. Two consequences follow from that design:

  • No setup per app. Because it works from the screen rather than an API, it is not limited to apps that offer integrations.
  • On-device processing. AGI-0 lives on the phone, which is the basis for its privacy and offline claims.

AGI, Inc. also reports that AGI-0 scored 100% on AndroidWorld, completing 116 of 116 tasks. That figure comes from the company itself and refers to a benchmark, not a guarantee for every real-world task.

What it can do

The site groups example tasks into four areas, each showing the kind of multi-step request the agent is meant to handle:

Area Example prompt from the site
Groceries & Shopping "Order all the ingredients I need to make gluten-free spaghetti on Instacart"
Travel & Rideshare "Find the fastest route to the airport and book a ride if the train is delayed"
Messaging & Scheduling "Find the most suitable place for tennis lessons in my schedule for the next 6 months"
Media & Entertainment "Find the playlist Jake sent me in Messages and play it on Spotify"

These examples share a pattern: the task spans more than one app or requires a decision (compare routes, check a schedule, locate a message), and the agent is expected to carry it through rather than just open an app.

Privacy, offline use, and learning

AGI, Inc. states that AGI-0 runs on the device, learns your preferences and improves over time, and works offline, on wearables, and for privacy-sensitive tasks. In practice this means tasks that don't need a network connection can still be attempted, and the agent's behavior is meant to adapt to how you like things done. The site does not publish details on exactly what data stays on the device versus what is shared, so treat the privacy framing as the company's stated design goal rather than a fully documented specification.

Who it is for

AGI-0 is aimed at Android users who want an agent to take over routine phone work — ordering, booking, scheduling, finding and playing media — so they spend less time tapping through screens. It is also relevant to developers: AGI, Inc. offers a platform for building action agents, which the company says can get a working agent shipped in less than a day. If your priority is an agent that works inside apps without integration work and keeps processing on the device, AGI-0 is built around that; if you need documented enterprise data-handling guarantees, the public materials don't yet provide them.

Access is handled through the company's "Get access" and "Book a call" routes on its site; pricing and availability details are not specified in the available materials.

Website Overview

Page metadata, canonical configuration and social previews work together to provide more consistent search and sharing presentation.

Domain and Registration

Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain has about 3 years of registration history; its current configuration provides more context than age alone. The registrar is NameCheap, Inc., a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .company extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by Cloudflare, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown. TXT records include verification markers for Google, Apple. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The response lacks these common security headers: CSP, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header contains the custom value Framer/24ab00f. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Framer 2f17f47 without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

The Generator tag identifies Framer 2f17f47, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. Twitter Card metadata is configured. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity. The title has 52 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 159 characters.

Hosting and Email

DNSCloudflare
HostingAmazon.com, Inc.
EmailGoogle Workspace
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) The Netherlands flagAmsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands Inferred 31.43.160.6

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarNameCheap, Inc.
Registered2023-04-11
Expires2027-04-11
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserversalexandra.ns.cloudflare.com、margo.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Atheagi.company31.43.160.6300—
Atheagi.company31.43.161.6300—
MXtheagi.companyaspmx.l.google.com3001
MXtheagi.companyalt1.aspmx.l.google.com3005
MXtheagi.companyalt2.aspmx.l.google.com3005
MXtheagi.companyaspmx2.googlemail.com30010
MXtheagi.companyaspmx3.googlemail.com30010
NStheagi.companyalexandra.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
NStheagi.companymargo.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
TXTtheagi.companyTAILSCALE-pnmurdSt63p938WkUnlw300—
TXTtheagi.companyapple-domain-verification=xE2Wq6le5bTob50O300—
TXTtheagi.companyapple-domain-verification=y8Y6nNZRYlObyqbk300—
TXTtheagi.companygoogle-site-verification=BucpqDT2nX3aWHyHTplFa6mzBUpP2bGGqP4HLx9DnwQ300—
TXTtheagi.companyv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all300—
DMARC_dmarc.theagi.companyv=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:[email protected];300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjecttheagi.company
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2027-01-12T18:08 · Remaining when checked: 79 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html
cache-controlpublic, max-age=0, must-revalidate
serverFramer/24ab00f
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000
x-content-type-optionsnosniff

Identified technologies

Framer 2f17f47

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionAGI, Inc. builds AGI-0, a small action model, and an agent that sees the screen and acts across any app on Android. No APIs or integrations, private by design.
Canonical URLhttps://theagi.company/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image
oai-searchbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
chatgpt-user 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
claude-searchbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
claude-user 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
perplexitybot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
perplexity-user 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
googlebot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
bingbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
applebot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
duckassistbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
gptbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
claudebot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
google-extended 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
ccbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
All bots 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.